Well, some are.
What difference does it even make? If the Earth is flat, and someone has manipulated us into thinking it is round (why?), despite all observable reality, that can only mean that there is a level of control in place that is insurmountable. At that point everything you do is pointless; it's just a black pill for people who have already given up.
Flat. Earth. Is. Retarded.
The sun rises in the East and sets in the West, everywhere on the planet, year round.
Get a frisbee and a tennis ball and try to figure out that could possibly happen on a flat Earth.
It's just well poison. A few hundred people are paid to "question" the "consensus" and then act like everyone is persecuting them or i denial. This then smears anyone who questions the concensus as a retard.
It's not that complicated...
She's not calling for government censorship, though. She's calling for an "international alliance", which means NGO, which means no oversight.
We should push for communication monopolies to be nationalized; it's they only way they'll be held to honor free speech.
Are you a flat earth fuckwit?
The sun rises in the East. Don't even need to quote wikipedia for that one.
Not only does it rise in the East, it does so year round, everywhere on Earth (somewhat North East or South East depending on which hemisphere you live on). The only way that could work on a flat Earth is if the world looked like the map you see in a school class room: north pole on top, south pole at the bottom, random cut-off somewhere in the Pacific, with the sun moving around the middle, which is obviously retarded. You would not be able to start from, say, New York and travel in one direction until you returned to the same place. You would not be able to cross either pole. You would have to have an edge of the world somewhere in the ocean (or on land), and at each pole, which is retarded.
If one of the poles was actually the circumference, and the other the center of a disc (which would allow us to cross the Pacific and go over at least one pole), then the sun would come up due north for some, due south for others, and every direction in between for everyone else. And that would change as the orbit of the sun rotated around the disc such that everyone would, at some point every year, see the sun rise due North and due South. But at least you would get seasons, except there would be eight of them as the places near the rising and setting sun would get summer while the places furthest would get winter. One full cycle (or year) would have two summers, two winters etc., one where the sun rises due North, one where the sun rises due South.
Oh, and everyone would experience the sunrise at the exact same time, so no time zones (unless light physics are a conspiracy theory as well).
If the sun's orbit stayed constant, you would have a permanent hot zone along it's route and permanent winter elsewhere, no change in seasons.
None of this requires any math or physics. You can replicate it with a frisbee and a tennis ball.
Unless the FE crowd can show somewhere on Earth where the sun rises due North or South, the Earth cannot be flat and, in fact, must be the surface of a three dimensional shape, probably a sphere. Fucking chuds...
Wtf is "8 inches per miles squared"? Miles squared is an area, not a distance; you can't measure the drop over an area because it would be different in different places within the area.
Do you actually just vehemently believe FE because you don't understand how units work?
And yes, that stuff about Polaris is exactly how it works. It doesn't matter that we wobble because Polaris is so far away that it makes no difference.
Look out your window when you can see the sun (or any other star) and put a sticker on the window. Now move your head close to the window, then move it back and forth. The sticker moves all over the place, relative to you, but the angle of the sun stays the same, because it's far away.
Everything you say to "prove" FE is just questioning the heliocentric model. FE explains nothing, and so you explain nothing, just question and doubt.
At what point do you, and people hearing you, start to suppose that the reason you "question everything" is because you know nothing?
"Kikepedia" says white people exist, is that a lie too? Do you just assume everything is a lie, because of the source? Doesn't that basically make you as stupid as a person beleiving everything on "kikepedia" is true?
Hey, that's not entirely true.
They also make up some other bullshit claim and forget they ever claimed the first one.
Still waiting to hear how time zones work on FE. Not to mention why the sun doesn't come up in completely different directions depending on the time of year. Or even seasons, come to think of it.
It either a retarded larp or these people have simply decided to stop thinking and just assume literally everything the government says is a lie.
Both the ancient greeks and arabs independently proved the Earth was a globe.
The chosen few now paralyzed by doubt.
You know nothing and you can't tell the difference between lies and truth.
There he is, the guy from the meme :D
I'm definitely not an expert but for EM waves to interact with something, the period (distance from peak to peak of the wave) needs to be smaller than the subject (ideally the length of the subject is an exact multiple of the period).
The higher the frequency, the shorter the period. My understanding is that high frequency 5g carrier waves are in fact at the scale that would be necessary to interact with these things we're finding.
I don't know if they do anything, only that it's probably possible to activate them with 5g if they do.
What complicates things further is that, since the WEF etc control so much, even if he did oppose them he would have a hard time doing it overtly. He'd have to pick his battles or even hide his intentions until a critical moment which could make him look like he's onside.
Or he could be acting the part of Eurasian against Oceana.
Either way, it doesn't seem to be in his interest to be anything other than an oligarch.
They aren't, and humans have known this for centuries.
They look like they don't move because they're VERY FAR AWAY.
Take a ride on the bus. Look out the window. The grass beside you zips by. The barn across the field takes 5 minutes to pass by. The Sun doesn't appear to move at all (although it actually does). All of these things are moving at the exact same speed relative to you (the speed of the bus), but look like they move at different speeds because of distance.
I find it incredible that FE believers think they're so perceptive because they watched some Youtube videos but have never taken the time to observe reality.
I've debunked it multiple times using simple geometry, you keep going back to "muh curves".
As for thinking, you actually posted something about how the light on the moon didn't line up with the sun, it was futher back, so how could it "curve"?
Well, that got me thinking but I figured it out with a tennis ball and a soccer ball.
If you were standing directly between the sun and moon, the crescent would be thicker closer to the sun. However, if you are to either side, you don't actually see the whole crescent and so the thickest point no longer lines up with the sun.
I didn't see this in some video on Youtube like where you get all your info, I just did the experiment for myself.
Who gives a shit about the curve? Light does all kinds of crazy crap, not to mention how optical illusions can mess with your eyes.
Let's talk basic geometry regaeding FE.
Explain time zones.
Explain how the sun rises in the East and sets in the West everywhere and everyday.
If the Earth was a disc, with the North Pole in the center and the South Pole a ring around the outside, the sun would rise in a different direction, and travel in a different direction, for everyone, depending on their location.
But no, the sun is a psyop...
Exactly. Flat Earthers have no idea what is true or not, only that they've been LIED to by SOMEONE.
The existence of time zones completely debunks FE, period. Not to mention the fact that the sun always rises in the East and sets in the West, everywhere on Earth. Get yourself a frisbee and a tennis ball and figure that one out.
I find FE makes me think more.
Every piece of evidence they throw at you supporting FE can be debunked by learning a bit more physics or geometry. It's been a good exercise for the old head muscles.
Unless those stars were ridiculously far away...
Chair of the ACIP, calls the police to make it seem she is being stalked instead of answering honestly.
Doesn't make a good argument for women in the workplace, tbh...
There is no longer any “work,” or energy output, required, which is why the ESG and climate hoax crowd has hailed the project as a revolutionary achievement. They seem to miss the fact that ETH now represents a digital fiat currency, as there is no longer a legitimate case for a value proposition attached to it.
Aren't they all fiat currencies? Proof of stake just means that transactions and block creation are centralized, but none of them are staked to anything of actual value. The work in proof-of-work is only valuable so long as people value the coin, otherwise it's worthless. Is that not the definition of fiat: the currency is worth what people will pay for it?
Cloudflare delivers this HTML, they rewrite the HTML in realtime to simply remove your article.
So the solution is horrific spaghetti code that you update frequently in ways that break the site if not imitated perfectly?
I remember hearing a guy doing a TedTalk (?) about African ecology. They were trying to restore forests and figured: since elephants eat trees, that must be the reason the trees are gone and, if we cull elephants, the trees would come back.
So they did, and the trees didn't come back. Turns out the ecology was more complicated than they thought and the migratory elephants' dung was actually what the trees needed to grow. Killing the elephants only made things worse.
This is a metaphore for every God damn thing done by "environmentalists".
403 request forbidden?
Shut it down?