1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

I guess since there's no point to anything there's no point to you continuing to walk the earth then right?

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

See? You continue to completely misrepresent what this conversation was so you can "win". Good luck with your book

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Actually, you did, by asking how porn could be banned without the framework to ban it (informational control) when I said it should be made illegal, you implied porn could not "just" be made illegal WITHOUT it. The stance you're adopting now (that it should be illegal WITHOUT information and technological control) is a retroactive modification of your statements and agreeing with me but you continue thinking that your spastic attitude gives you some kind of win and moral high ground.

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Porn would still exist for people who really wanted to find it, just like all illegal goods do. Accepting (or even advocating for) complete and total informational control by the very people who were pushing the porn to begin with in order to eliminate those edge cases is absolutely irrational and what outs you as an overly emotional pearl clutcher

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm cool with banning porn, banning porn would actually be a solution. The locking down of the Internet is not a good thing and they're using porn to get emotional pearl clutchers like you on board instead of just banning porn overall

2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

The personal preferences of OP, dubious though they may be, do not negate the overall point that this is about control

6
VeilOfReality 6 points ago +6 / -0

If you know their names, if they're promoted by all the media no matter where you look, if they're talking about each other, they're a character

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's all part of the show man. She's not going to do anything except maybe help advance the next phase of the narrative

2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes they're on the same team

2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

I see, I've also seen it as a tool for measurement, but a lagging indicator as I believe they already know who they want to be in power and that the voting numbers we see are probably fake anyway (Trump supporters believe this but somehow ONLY for 2020)

2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just make a tiktok video, apparently those are 100% legit

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

But doesn't that seem incongruous with your previous assertion that the alternative was worse?

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

It seems like we are. I just so frequently see people with that same sentiment of "yeah they're both bad but one is less bad", but the reality as it seems to me is both sides are serving the same master and the same agenda so it really doesn't matter. The difference is in the perception. I think it's important to keep in mind and avoid the same cognitive dissonance of people who would at one moment say "Biden is unable to run our country look at him" and the next moment blame Biden, specifically, for whatever was happening. It's like a semi awakening followed by going back to sleep

3
VeilOfReality 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Appears to be" is doing the heavy lifting here. Technofeudalism is pushed to the extreme under Trump but that's less ragebaity than woke stuff

4
VeilOfReality 4 points ago +4 / -0

greatawakening.win would not agree with you

2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

The hand puppet on the right side is so much better than the hand puppet on the left

3
VeilOfReality 3 points ago +3 / -0

Try telling that to the Qtards

6
VeilOfReality 6 points ago +6 / -0

Troost the plan, the government taking over by force is good when Trump does it!

3
VeilOfReality 3 points ago +3 / -0

Even the phrasing here is weasely. Nothing that was "concerning" to her? What kind of behavior WOULD cause concern for a child sex trafficker?

3
VeilOfReality 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not enough people will care. They were desensitized to all their info being stolen by government agencies and private companies, and the rollout for this is targeted to go after things the majority of people agree with first. Look, most people agree kids shouldn't have access to porn, and most people do not give a shit about porn games. I happen to fall into the majority on these. But that's why those represented the initial phase of the rollout because it would be non-controversial in subject matter - and even here at this conspiracy board you have people celebrating these actions - your average person will not care to impugn deeper motive.

Keep spreading the word, as that's our moral obligation

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›