All elections are probably rigged. The pendulum always "swings", keeping both sides invested, highlighting the differences in smaller things (gay marriage, trans shit, millions of brown illegals vs millions of brown legals) while the politicians at both ends slow walk us to the same larger overall conclusions (same wars, same infinitely inflating currency, same technocratic control, global homogenization, etc).
If you weren't so overly emotional, you'd see that I actually agreed with you that there are reasons to believe the majority of people (who were motivated to vote) supported the outcome. However, that doesn't change my overall belief that all elections of any consequence are rigged one way or another.
Wouldn't be true without natalism. Bailing out irresponsible parents is a huge amount of the budget, and extra funding for parents who work is ridiculous.
Those in power don't seem to understand basic economics and are just using tariffs as a crutch to raise taxes in stealth.
They cut barely anything, except spite fueled targeting of single men to lose their Medicaid, the very people who need it, because they don't have any support from society, unlike femroaches.
GOP is too Christian to be fiscally conservative, more willing to enable parasitism for "muh birth rates" and target people they already didn't like as a weak attempt to pretend the economic failure isn't their fault.
technocratic control
Who kicked that hornets nest other than the Christian anti-porn lobby?
Christian influence, objectively, has been a disaster for freedom, economic progress and budget reform. If it wasn't for Sam Altman and the tech sector spending money like it's worthless to one up each other on AI, we'd be in a substantial global recession thanks to Trump's pandering to Christianity.
All elections are probably rigged. The pendulum always "swings", keeping both sides invested, highlighting the differences in smaller things (gay marriage, trans shit, millions of brown illegals vs millions of brown legals) while the politicians at both ends slow walk us to the same larger overall conclusions (same wars, same infinitely inflating currency, same technocratic control, global homogenization, etc).
If you weren't so overly emotional, you'd see that I actually agreed with you that there are reasons to believe the majority of people (who were motivated to vote) supported the outcome. However, that doesn't change my overall belief that all elections of any consequence are rigged one way or another.
Wouldn't be true without natalism. Bailing out irresponsible parents is a huge amount of the budget, and extra funding for parents who work is ridiculous.
Those in power don't seem to understand basic economics and are just using tariffs as a crutch to raise taxes in stealth.
They cut barely anything, except spite fueled targeting of single men to lose their Medicaid, the very people who need it, because they don't have any support from society, unlike femroaches.
GOP is too Christian to be fiscally conservative, more willing to enable parasitism for "muh birth rates" and target people they already didn't like as a weak attempt to pretend the economic failure isn't their fault.
Who kicked that hornets nest other than the Christian anti-porn lobby?
Christian influence, objectively, has been a disaster for freedom, economic progress and budget reform. If it wasn't for Sam Altman and the tech sector spending money like it's worthless to one up each other on AI, we'd be in a substantial global recession thanks to Trump's pandering to Christianity.
Were you going to explain at some point how humanity can reproduce without reproduction?