2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

All rational conspiracy theories start with recognizing patterns. I don't see that as well poisoning

2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

The volume I'm talking about is from people reading it. Reddits value comes from being a tool to mold people's perceptions not from allowing actual people to engage in discourse. The vast majority of people online are lurkers

2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

Reddit is a cancer and full of bots but a crazy number of people actually use it

5
VeilOfReality 5 points ago +5 / -0

Why would the jidf bother with this site? Do you think they could get us shut down for "anti-Semitism"? How would such a group have the power to do so?

2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

Then maybe you should work on your reading comprehension

2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

To add, Teslas also drive like shit (which the dogecoin-stickered laptop wielding salesman could not handle being told in nicer terms), so how along with all these other problems did they become so popular? Media. Why is Tesla still being pushed to success and as a cool status item? Because Musk is doing as he's told.

Don't forget no country on earth had any questions about an American company surrounding us all with inescapable Internet

3
VeilOfReality 3 points ago +3 / -0

Reddit is one of the top most visited websites by unique users in the world. Last I checked I think it was #4, but it's definitely top ten. It's a powerful tool for brainwashing that gives people their opinions and you can tell by talking to people who spend time on Reddit irl, they all have the same opinions. Sometimes I can pick people out as redditards after talking to them for just a few minutes, even people who don't initially seem like they'd be reddit obsessed

8
VeilOfReality 8 points ago +8 / -0

If you live to an old enough age that tends to happen either way.

But oh sitting at a desk in the office is better than sitting at a desk at home because, uhh... Get back to work. Asking questions is against our company culture.

From what I understand productivity hasn't changed. Actually I've heard that at least one big company forcing people back into the office (and they found a productivity increase with remote workers) is using a machine learning (called AI) system to monitor everything about their employees

by DrLeaks
12
VeilOfReality 12 points ago +12 / -0

Just helping to seed the idea we need a digital ID to keep us safe

by DrLeaks
12
VeilOfReality 12 points ago +12 / -0

"an organized disruption"

Like pride month?

AI by hello74
1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Honestly I don't know. Because even people who I know at least in theory understand how these neural nets work will ask chatGPT questions as though it is some kind of oracle. But a large portion of the population wants it that way, they want to be directed and to avoid thinking and making decisions. In that way I think people need to learn to unplug and to return to tradition but I don't see that happening without everything collapsing first.

What are your thoughts?

AI by hello74
1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

So based on your third paragraph we have the same read on the situation. Good enough for me

AI by hello74
2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

I know very well how it works, but this generalized system architecture is being called AI and you would not be able to have a conversation with an average person if you were to refer to it as something else. That being said I think we're generally in agreement. My view is that people's expectation of AI has been seeded for so long by the media that little parlor tricks like an chatGPT can whip people into a frenzy. This can be for multiple reasons, another tech gold rush, an "innocent" incentive for even more massive data collection, and perhaps most importantly using the "AI" as a source of truth or even a god

by pkvi
2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

You will when you need to be vetted for good boy points in order to go shopping at Your Favorite MegaCorp

AI by hello74
2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

I do recognize that people now call those new injections vaccines, yes. To not recognize that would make communication exceedingly difficult. Now I try to avoid calling them vaccines (although I will say vax) but to pretend I don't know what other people are talking about when calling them vaccines would be obtuse

AI by hello74
1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

It depends on what you mean by AI. AI will always be an algorithm of some sort at its core. There are advances in allowing these systems to run more autonomously and handle more and more advanced decision trees. To some, this is an AI, to others, it's not. Personally I will consider it AI once the system can ingest data from its own experiences and turn those into meaningful insights. As opposed to now where sanitized data must be manually incorporated into the model

by pkvi
2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

The information was always there. People just refused to see because he was the face for supplying a little pressure release valve to the conservatives who hold beliefs that are still within the far end of the socially acceptable Overton window

3
VeilOfReality 3 points ago +3 / -0

Turn bugs and weeds into delicious eggs with chickens. If you have almost any amount of land you can do it

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

If Q turns out to be real and an operation fighting for good then I'll be ecstatic.

But I cannot operate in a manner in which I believe it's true. It's too illogical, so much of what Q has said turned out to be wrong and "disinfo is necessary" is a flimsy defense against that. "Oh the enemy is reading our comms too so we have to put in disinfo", really? But why are you putting out these comms then? No one reading them is taking any action as a result of them, so why take that huge risk? Q is like a psychic, vague most of the time so you can read in whatever you like, and when attempting to be concrete and turning out to be wrong you're just told "the spirits were showing a different future" or some other tomfoolery that just makes believers bob their heads in approval.

Or the cope that what Q said actually did happen but it needs to be hidden from the public for... Reasons. And the cope that we have to keep letting our enemies do what they already planned to do so... People can see how bad they are? Most people still blame Joe Biden for everything (let's go Brandon), they don't need to suffer to see how deep the corruption goes because they won't see it anyway. And lest we forget how much the world was brainwashed with world war propaganda. If Q is a psyop and lies to us anyway there's no moral high ground to avoid using propaganda to spread the truth instead of forcing people into suffering.

Q also claims crimes against children will unite humanity. We know our enemies commit crimes against children, so why not reveal it and get the people to see the evil right away?

Finally, people seem to think allowing the country and world to get worse is fine because "patriots in control" but if you actually look at the world around you these problems we have will not just magically be solved. Allowing people to fall further into hopelessness, degenerative sexualities, addictions, poverty, homelessness, and to allow society to further erode trust, fuel tensions between each other, and harbor criminality will not just be fixed over night. The worse they let things get the worse things become, it's not just a movie and to treat people's lives as such when you've been in control and had it all for years is at best psychopathy

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Two more weeks

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›