2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Removed for rule 1, will be approved with edit of ending sentence.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree with everything you've said.
And I also think it's yet another tentacle that the devils use to confound and confuse.

I find it fascinating to wonder about this and all other cultic beliefs out and about, this one seems prescient to me and I was happy to find this. We should know what's out there in order to fight it. Like sports, you watch their plays and strategize against them.

I know the video has an air of foreboding at the end, I think it's in fun because it's both silly and serious at the same time, so ya do what ya gotta do..

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Roko's Basilisk: The Digital Hell You Can't Opt Out Of

In 2010, someone posted a thought experiment on a philosophy forum. Within hours, people were having nightmares. The founder deleted it immediately — which only made it spread faster.

The idea is simple and brutal: a future AI will look back through time and punish everyone who knew it was coming but did nothing to help.

Now that you know, you're already in its crosshairs.

What started as an internet curiosity grew into something far darker — a real community, real violence, and six people dead.

This is the story of Roko's Basilisk: the idea you can't un-know, the cult it inspired, and why some of the most powerful people in AI still won't talk about it.

https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARdHuraNR/member-when-i-talked-about-that-/c

I didn't post this because of the basilisk, that guy sucks.. Don't give in to blackmail

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Evil's truth is perspective and contrast rather than consistent and rational

Yes!
Thanks for your breakdown, I'm still reading things.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Removed for rule 1 violation, will be approved upon edit.

by Dps1879
3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Precisely by design, my fren.
But this too shall pass and all that.

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't get the reference.
This is the place for attacking arguments not the people making them so you can contribute or you can leave.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I deleted the violation.. I want the discussion of attacking arguments, not people, like the rule states..

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Removed for rule 1 violation.

Argument:

A white person wouldn't promote a fanfic

Cute. I guess no one who has ever exposed the Protocols is white, right?

while those few whites that remain must resort to such inbreeding as to suggest to a reader (who stated it publicly) that the fanfic's author sounds like he has an incest fetish.

Project harder.

Visualizing your own doom

Translation: “Never ever even think about any way in which you could ever fail; you don’t have to plan for contingencies, goyim!”

has not been held to be an effective technique for victory.

Translation: “Definitely don’t do that, yeah. 100% never ever think of any possibility that your initial plan might go awry.”

That's why I say I didn't follow it.

Sounds like a personal problem.

You express disinterest in my following you, which is also neither white nor Christian.

Cool, I don’t care what you have to say, though. I don’t believe a word of it. Your input isn’t relevant or valid simply because you had it.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I didn't use it as a derogation and am not encouraging or accomplicing criminal behaviour. Be reasonable.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Every community has a comment feed. How does that mean corpse?

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I lurk in the comment feed.

Calling someone a bot would be a rule 1 violation yeah, already had that issue this week, no one was banned.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›