The second sentence violates rule 1, which has always been a rule here. Comment can be approved upon edit.
So the science of it is no good?
My worry is less about my problem solving skills and more about humanity's as a whole.
I'm almost certain you and me and most people here will be fine when it goes down.
u/N0rds I tried to add you to the above message but put an O instead of 0 in your name.
First removed comment was from u/N0rds, hopefully not here just to cause trouble but I'm watching, and then u/Dregan_ya went in for defense and they were both removed and notified.
and the sky is gray..
but, of course..
Thanks for the update, i hate it
I can see it a few different ways also, I think that could be by design.
Great reporting!
I want you to be right and me to be wrong, I think it's more lockdowns towards the prison planet.
Facebook, Life Log, DARPA Tech Plans For Tracing.
The restrictions will expand.
Edit: Now in New York, Virginia and Australia.
What we should do is ban all porn and parasitic social media, they are all profiting from misery.
Instead we're gonna get a social credit scoring like China..
Removed for rule 1.
Removed for rule 1
Removed for rule 1:be respectful, attack the argument not the person. (The comment you replied and the next reply are also removed and I recognize that you didn't start the attack.
Removed for rule 1:be respectful, attack the argument not the person.
Removed for rule 1.
Removed for rule 1 violation: be respectful, attack the argument, not the person.
My theory is that the US is the whore of babylon. I'm not running, per se, just preparing for the possibilty that the grid goes down and mass chaos ensues. I can't prep for everything and will be relying on the Lord's provisons as I sleep in a tree, someday.
They'll reactivate the grid and allow those that pledge allegience to re-enter society, if my hunch is correct.
I am saying you had a comment removed for a rule 1 violation, even if you think it's vague and borderline and that comment can be approved upon you editing it to remove what violates the rule. Make sense?
So it wasn't in reply to the person who posted? Comment can be approved upon edit.
Yeah, and it's a rule 1 violation (be respectful, attack the argument not the person) if used in derogation here, which this was.
I'm not so sure, I have a theory about it but either way, better to prepare for the worst and hope for the best, I think.
It can be used as an insult, yeah. Hoping more of them see the light of life that is Jesus Christ.
It's an attack on the person not the argument.