2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nice! I'm prone to the directed energy weapon theory, myself. Judy Woods has great coverage on it.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

If it was up to Jesus there would never have been any of this death but freewill was the risk of real free love.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think Jesus has and will kill babies, (death doesn't mean condemnation), we aren't talking the same thing. It will be as in the times of Noah but He promised to not wipe us all out this time.. Jesus is the Most High God's form, He is the same yesterday, today and tomorrow.

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

God Himself will be killing and it's not murder. Babies and many others will be saved even thru death. Almost one gets out of here alive. Elijah and Enoch did tho. Edit: if they are the 2 witnesses tho, they'll die too and then be resurrected.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

We hit the thread limit:

https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/16ZqiBusID/petition-to-make-cconspiracies-i/c

"Stay on Q."

Lmao, thanks for getting me to dig that shit up.

Me: Consider your petition granted, even if it was started in jest..

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for explaining. This is now a free for all thread per Graphenium and he wishes all his content to be a free for all.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

There are plenty of other places to slap fight and name call, this place is trying to be better than that. Haven't you also suggested this place was for elite research?

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

How does rule 1 not include name calling? It is included in attack no way around it for my brain.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Does that mean you want this thread to be a free for all? It's your content here even tho I posted it.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I did, it's still funny to me, I've used that many times myself. We can disagree and I can still laugh about stuff.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Name calling does nothing for healthy discussion and I think it's a lazy cop out that makes people look out of rebuttals. In other words it makes one look poorly and I'm hoping to build people up and we should all be able to admit when we are wrong or out of defenses, honorable type stuff.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

He said if he'd banned one he would have to ban the other and he had decided to ignore things and then went missing. I'm not going to ignore things and I don't plan to go missing..

1
Thisisnotanexit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Clem removed comments of name calling and death wishing. Should I gather receipts for you?

I read the interaction differently and have a comment out to SwampRangers to clarify for us.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Mod logs are public.
I see no way of understanding name calling not being an attack in the person and not the argument.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your comment ' You're literally a Hollow Earther according to HH on 10-24 21:53 and you're literally defending that as the most accurate explanation of any in the world.'

Is being understood as a slur and then you were slurred against and me and Graph are at an impasse about this.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is name calling an attack? (Yes) And can you prove your point in mod logs before me? I actually studied it.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›