2
Thisisnotanexit [M] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Removed for rule 1.

Argument:

To disprove the "flat earthers" just give us a continuous live feed of video mounted on the outside of the craft, additionally on the inside from take off to Orbit and show us the earth/takeoff process. It's really that easy.

They're supposedly going anyway. Just do it. Show us the ball and the planes flying underneath the ball within the atmosphere.

You guys have the 30 Billion budget, you have to prove what you're telling us, flat earthers don't have the budget, just going off the information given and what's not adding up.

Flat earthers are vilified but havnt done any true space experiments cause we don't have the money, so why such pushback if it's a fringe idea.

You can say "I think we live in a computer simulation" everyone will agree and have no problems

"I think we live on a flat plan" Brooooo what the fuck!! --- You don't really. Believe that.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Did I miss something being said against you?

I haven't removed it yet because I was waiting for the other user to edit themselves, it's the first time I've asked them.

Edit: and I don't hate Tallest edit2: and arguments are being saved

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

hmm, I like it, maybe I should get a badge 🌟

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

That makes a lot of sense. And yeah, editing someone's words as if they said it is illegal and more than that violates the moral law I adhere to. Thanks for helping me learn new stuff.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

It has come to my attention that what I thought was borderline against you is actually a violation, I've asked them to edit and wanted to say I'm sorry.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's come to my attention that the 'are you an idiot?' That I thought was borderline is actually a violation of rule 1. Are you willing to edit please?

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I haven't and have no capabilities to edit your words under your comment. My removing your comment and replying with your argument is not against the law.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Removed for rule 1 violation.

Argument from TallestSkil:

To disprove the "flat earthers" just give us a continuous live feed of video mounted on the outside of the craft

They did this. It’s still live. You can watch it right now. You have been able to watch it 24/7 since the mission began.

additionally on the inside from take off to Orbit and show us the earth/takeoff process.

They have done this with hundreds of flights.

It's really that easy.

Strange that you’re still spamming things only paid shills have ever said in the wake of it, then, isn’t it.

Show us the ball and the planes flying underneath the ball within the atmosphere.

Seek psychiatric help immediately.

flat earthers don't have the budget

Except for the guy who did and gave up his views after it was proved to him.

Flat earthers are vilified but haven't done any true space experiments cause we don't have the money

You don’t have the funding because --- (you) can’t hold down the most basic of jobs.

so why such pushback if it's a fringe idea.

There is no pushback. You’re allowed to exist freely in society, because society is run by psychopathic demons who want you raped and murdered. Anyone who tells the truth about those demons gets pushback. You can say whatever you want because you’re what they want to exist.

You can say "I think we live in a computer simulation" everyone will agree and have no problems

No one agrees.

"I think we live on a flat plan" Brooooo what the fuck!! Are you an idiot?? (This is borderline a violation from u/FallenNephilim)

Link: https://cdn.zmescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/power-lines-1024x536.jpg

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Then I'll edit it. Then I'll remove your comment and add your argument. I was hoping you'd take care of things yourself but I'll go get my broom and dustpan..

I'm not involved in your dispute. I don't think the earth is flat and I don't treat people that do like garbage, now anyway, I'm maturing 🌞

4
Thisisnotanexit 4 points ago +4 / -0

Edit the link to avoid rule 1 please. You can disprove without calling him an idiot. His questioning if you're an idiot is borderline a violation.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

This could also be good for discussion. Thanks!

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nice! I'm prone to the directed energy weapon theory, myself. Judy Woods has great coverage on it.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

If it was up to Jesus there would never have been any of this death but freewill was the risk of real free love.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think Jesus has and will kill babies, (death doesn't mean condemnation), we aren't talking the same thing. It will be as in the times of Noah but He promised to not wipe us all out this time.. Jesus is the Most High God's form, He is the same yesterday, today and tomorrow.

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

God Himself will be killing and it's not murder. Babies and many others will be saved even thru death. Almost one gets out of here alive. Elijah and Enoch did tho. Edit: if they are the 2 witnesses tho, they'll die too and then be resurrected.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

We hit the thread limit:

https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/16ZqiBusID/petition-to-make-cconspiracies-i/c

"Stay on Q."

Lmao, thanks for getting me to dig that shit up.

Me: Consider your petition granted, even if it was started in jest..

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for explaining. This is now a free for all thread per Graphenium and he wishes all his content to be a free for all.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

There are plenty of other places to slap fight and name call, this place is trying to be better than that. Haven't you also suggested this place was for elite research?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›