Filter is catching some of your comments, going thru for approvals now.
Yes a downvoter, to say a coinclipper (does that even work anymore?), and a non white male implies an attack at that person and not their argument.
I downvoted this comment to remind you about rule 1 even it's not direct. Users are free to upvote or downvote as they please, this is 'Scored', right?
Maybe add this to the other fentcom post and make yourself a mega thread. Cuts down on cluttering the board while getting a bunch of relevant info out. Your help is much appreciated.
sounds lazy to me..
Did a data center really get hit or is this some joke I don't get, I'm not understanding the conspiracy, based on given info, would you be willing to add a submission statement, please?
I find it very helpful!
If you look into word studies the word catholic actually means universal:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_(term)
Now if I were the devils I would work hard to corrupt that, just say'n.
And if/when Jews do that here I'll moderate them same as anyone.
Something about multiple wrongs don't make rights..
Waited a day for edit and then removed.
Argument:
Lol - I have 6907 and 1006. So again...
It's a stitching error
Plenty of theories surrounding this idea and the reverse position. Hope it stirs discussion.
The comic styling gave me dejavu of previous bouts of this style of memes in the before mod time..
Will that pattern I mentioned be repeating?
Confirmed removal from filter because I think we've been here before with the overmemeing and almost no theorizing and facting. Will this pattern be repeating? Or, is this going to be reasonable meme sharing?
You're welcome to criticize the Jews and Americans, Canadians.. Whoever.
I just wanted to have a convo because of the dejavu I'm having.
Thanks, I'm in communication with Tallest about my misunderstanding 2 things today. Hoping everyone can see this as a silver lining to be helping me learn. TEAMWORK
That's a huge hyperinflation. There are good rules and there are bad rules, the first rule here actually adheres to God's rules and therefore is the most good, even if some people can't see that yet.
Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.
If you want anarchy, you'll have to make a free for all thread and I'll mark and flair it.
If I say: me and you often go round and round on technicalities and talk over each other missing eachother's point often that's not an attack on your or a failing on me, it's an observation of our history socializing together.
The rules are good rules, I'm talking with Tallest and I might have been misunderstanding things today. Thanks for your input, I'm learning.
I did think the cowardice part was the attack. It seems I was wrong on the God thing that I took to also be an attack so perhaps I'm just highly misunderstanding things today, I'm sorry. I'll approve and hope you can see this as a silver lining for me to be learning.
The God you deny, you mean
This is an attack on the person, not the argument.
(Edit per user I took to being attacked, this isn't an attack, thanks for helping me learn)
Lotta violations today, my fren, is there something I can do to help you two talk more productively?
Pretty sure the previous comment was observations between the two of yours history, I don't see how it's an attack.
My request stands.
I don't see how persona is an attack and there are others ways to express your observations and arguments besides the way you did it, you made it an attack. No approval.
Another rule 1 violation attack the argument not the person dude. Please be reasonable.
Removed for rule 1 violation, will be approved upon edit of the first sentence.
Well we're not using slurs to attack users here. (Edit: we're attacking arguments)
I don't think IGOexiled is a criminal, I think it was a joke and I'd like you to please remove your attack against him here.
Ah so..