I am not sure what you mean by that exactly. Parchment reference?
The Constitution is just a piece of parchment. It’s meaningless. It doesn’t grant rights. Not in the text, and not in the physical world. It merely recognizes self-evident rights that are logically derived from the natural order. People defend those natural rights. Or they don’t.
And we won’t. That’s all there is to it. “The Constitution will save us!” is psychopathy created by communists to trick half of their false dichotomy into complacency.
After reviewing a dozen of your comments
Wish there was a way for people to see the best, rather than “the most recent”…
buzzwords only paid shills have ever said
all posted positions are either objective falsehoods or diametrically opposite to everything that everyone on this website supports
Project harder. You’re not fooling anyone, kike.
Pieces of cloth don’t matter.
directly implicating Americans’ rights to sexual privacy
Wrong.
and same-sex marriage.
You don’t have a “right” to be a queer.
Few phrases could so aptly capture Thurgood Marshall’s vision of the court’s work as “protector of the powerless.”
Translation: The nigger had no idea what a court even is, and therefore should not have been on it.
Marshall’s work to advance Black citizenship is well known
They were already citizens. He did nothing.
but he also fought for expanded rights for women
I hate him already.
and the indigent
No, he didn’t. How about declaring the Federal Reserve unconstitutional, since it is? He did fucking nothing.
the accused and convicted
The dindu and the nuffin.
adherents to marginalized religions
Translation: foreigners who don’t belong in the US and whom the founders would have executed or expelled.
and those with unpopular viewpoints.
But not anyone he personally hated, of course.
enforcement of constitutional rights “frequently requires this Court to rein in the forces of democratic politics,” to protect the powerless from the tyranny of the majority.
But he didn’t do that at all.
Marshall’s signature accomplishment as a lawyer in Brown v. Board of Education was to convince the court to overturn the doctrine of separate but equal that had emerged after the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson decision.
So… he did what was possibly the worst thing that has ever happened to race relations in the US, great.
Marshall argued passionately and repeatedly that the death penalty violated the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment
And the Founders explicitly said otherwise, so eat shit.
assault on precedent
Burn in hell, communist.
the lack of modern voting discrimination made the act unnecessary.
Neat, and?
weakening the vitality of the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause, which fortifies the separation between church and state.
WRONG. IT SAYS FUCKING NOTHING ABOUT THAT AT ALL. THAT’S AN ENTIRELY SEPARATE, NON-CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION.
Gideon v. Wainwright, which established a constitutional right to a lawyer for indigent criminal defendants.
Those in need of constitutional protection in Thomas’ view are more likely to be property owners
“The only people who deserve to vote, and therefore the only ones with a stake in the survival of the nation.” What’s the fucking problem?
corporations making campaign contributions
Corporations aren’t people. They can’t make contributions, by law.
or gun owners.
“Every man in the nation.” What’s the fucking problem?
Indeed, Thomas claims his position requiring colorblindness is a better path toward full Black citizenship.
And you, personally, say the same thing. what’s the problem?
Marshall always looked at the issue from a different perspective, arguing that access to opportunities was essential not only for the Black students affected but for the nation at large.
He was wrong.
“If we are ever to become a fully integrated society, one in which the color of a person’s skin will not determine the opportunities available to him or her,” Marshall wrote in 1977, “we must be willing to take steps to open those doors.”
“OY VEY YOU HAVE TO DISCRIMINATE BASED ON SKIN SO THAT YOU DON’T DISCRIMINATE BASED ON SKIN! I CAN’T SEE ANYTHING WRONG WITH THIS!”
That turn would be yet another reversal squandering Marshall’s vision of the court.
Good. Burn it to the ground.
The Conversation, an independent nonprofit news site
Not independent.
It was written by: Daniel Kiel, University of Memphis.
EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.
They only way AI kills humans, is if humans are dumb enough to believe in what AI parses together and shits out for them.
So… it’s a 100% guarantee, then.
this judge says
Who gives a shit. Physically kill the judge. Literally millennia of precedent of ownership law proves him wrong. The current laws on the books, even of digital purchases, prove him wrong. Do not obey.
No one will ever believe you.
No one will ever believe you.
But you’re on the same side.
Putin’s “Third Way”
Oy vey goyim, Hitler bad! Anything outside our false dichotomy bad! Also don’t question whether Russia is actually outside the false dichotomy!
We have to stop them. Or, wait until Jesus comes back.
Oy vey, goyim! Do absolutely nothing whatsoever and just wait for Christ!
Earth not flat. Space real. You insane and paid to post lies.
Enjoy your ban.
Your spam isn’t allowed here.
Five of them flamed out and then the Starship itself doesn’t seem to have disconnected.
How about you ask why you don’t send them to Him instead.
Walk into traffic.
If the war wasn’t just yet another hoax of whites killing whites, Russia would get off its ass and annex the whole of the south (where the ethnic Russians still live) and leave the rump north (of Ukrainians) to itself. Yes, it’s still a land border, but there wouldn’t be millions of fifth column rebels to deal with on either side. This also has the benefit of the Russian annexation of Transnistria, since otherwise they’ll still just be an exclave.
Here’s even a jew media article from 2014 talking about this.
Stop obeying laws. Stop paying taxes. Stop taking on debt. Stop having interest.
Stop paying taxes. Stop obeying laws.
soon
TWO MORE WEEKS, GOYIM!
It literally collapsed decades ago.
Given the Jews tend to be ultra progressive
But why use words the way they want them used?
why do they push for mass immigration
White genocide.
which will inevitably result in demographics
Demographics over there. As in “not in Israel.” Jews are all going to move to Israel, build a wall around it, and be collectively safe from the entire world full of mongrel mystery meat which exists solely to provide for them. That’s what their holy book says.
Oh well. Doesn’t matter. He’ll be punished for recording.
So after literally 20 years of online spam you’re just collating your clinical insanity into a book? It won’t sell. Give up now, pajeet.