Ever forwards implies ongoing motion...being implies temporal matter .... That implies transformation of partials within whole aka chemistry of all (alchemy) .... transformation implies a flowing process aka male (motion) through female (momentum) transformation (matter) ... form struggles to sustain self within flow by resisting temptation
Responsible.
origin (God)
Origin implies an outpouring from, God implies a label upon...held within
Then, Origin.
Can you show an example where ones denial of breathing let to ones death?
Jesus Christ.
Without differentiation through female (momentum) into trans-form (matter)...male (motion) couldn't be discerned by each different self as same origin. Differences identifying (equalizing; making same) each other implies self denial aka lack of self discernment...out of which one labels all with identities. Self implies perpetuation of one through intercourse with another one into off-spring...a setting apart by giving away. Not something to hold onto and identify with. It's ones claim of possession as "me; myself or I" which corrupts ones line of thought and thereby ones line of perpetuation through another. In short: all doesn't require self, since there's no other "all"...one requires self, since there are other ones within all to perpetuate self.
Then, All shows All (Him). What is "each different self"?
Does an outcome respond (re) to presented origin? What if a response (choice) can only operate in-between origin and outcome, hence from within a balance?
Then, how could one perceive death coming out?
If there's only needed origin, then why would one require a choice to balance within wanted outcomes? Where's temptation without outcomes to tempt choice to fall for? Does living represent (respond to presented) process of dying?
Who requires or wants? Does resistance process life?
So that there can be growth (partial ones) during loss (whole oneness)...an internal balance of external energy.
Does each one cease? Then, all would be lost.
chasing after death
What else?
Dying (loss/action) implies living (growth; reaction)...a simultaneous process of differentiation (matter) within origin (motion)
Then, the dying process represents transformation. How could a dying outcome represent or perceptibly come out?
Few suggest freedom (free and dom put together) to distract many from the ongoing differentiation of dominance (balance) into free (choice), and more importantly each ones discernment of self as wielding FREE will of choice.
Then, flow and resist, free and dominated.
form to flow transformation (life to death)
death makes each partial whole again
What if loss of form is partial? One could die forever.
to inspire adaptation. You may call this Gods' breath of life
"you may call" contradicts inspiring adaption to God's breath of life, because it tempts ones consent to another one .... A "call" shapes suggested information, which tempts others to ignore perceivable inspiration.
Thinking that one can "not choose" implies ones choice to consent to "nothing"
The issue is "thinking", hence revolving suggested information within ones consenting mind/memory.
Not death (noun)...
Getting "not" out of the vocabulary could help tremendously to prevent spell-craft to flourish, yet who is gonna give up denial?
dying (adjective), which implies to live (verb). b) One struggles/resists/suffers origin
Perceptive. Dying forever and ever ....
Ever forwards (for ever) generates odd adaptations, hence adapting "backwards" to incoming origin. If one moves ever forwards, then what would one react to?
Accepting death by the hands of others doesn't quite trigger the "will over respiration" achievement...
All shows All
To show implies to perceive, hence by one within all. All cannot perceive all, because perception implies differentiation of all into ones.
What is "each different self"?
Temporal within ongoing passing through one another aka sprouting/germination/offspring...
how could one perceive death coming out?
What comes out of the process of dying? Each living one coming to be within. All perceivable implies "input" coming out of process of dying; each ones perception implies living within.
Who requires or wants?
a) One who needs wants to ignore it.
b) One who responds to seeking (re-quire) aims at suggested outcomes, while ignoring perceivable FOUNDation, hence "seek an you shall find".
Does resistance process life?
Living implies resisting the process of dying, which tempts one to ignore resisting. Resistance implies ones re-sponding stance within velocity as choice within balance.
Does each one cease? Then, all would be lost.
a) Loss generates growth ; growth re-generates during loss.
b) Motion (all) utilizes momentum to generate matter (one)...only matter coming to be within momentum experiences growth (living) during loss (dying).
c) All implies generation of loss (action) and growth (reactions) internally. Only growth experiences loss.
d) Where would all lose ones to? Only ones can lose themselves within all.
e) All would be contradicts one being will.
"chasing after death" What else?
Utilizing guide to grow life, while others chase after death. To guide implies to direct...nature directs being; being reacts (life) to direction (inception towards death) by resisting the temptation thereof.
Then, the dying process represents transformation...
...of living.
How could a dying outcome represent or perceptibly come out?
a) Because each one comes out alive into the process of dying, before being moved back into it...
b) Having perception implies that one came out of perceivable...circumference (motion) generates center (matter).
Then, flow and resist, free and dominated
Form resisting dominating flow by free will of choice.
What if loss of form is partial?
If loss of form is partial, then WHOLE could grow...which contradicts whole. This line of thinking is based on ones consent to creationism, which suggests the whole creation and then some aka one creator added to all creation.
In reality...ONEs addition (inception); subtraction (death); multiplication (intercourse for off-spring) and division (whole into partials) can only operate within ALL.
One could die forever.
Each temporary one dies within ever forwarding all.
forever and ever
That implies multiplying "ongoing", while ignoring that only temporal can be multiplied within ongoing by division.
In that line of thinking...addition (living) during subtraction (dying).
Perceptive. Dying
Just because perceivable implies dying, doesn't mean that ones living perception has to ignore itself for it.
Then, for ever, and ever (back).
Temporal matter forwards and back (choice) within momentum (balance) of ongoing motion.
Accepting death by the hands of others doesn't quite trigger the "will over respiration" achievement...
Spirit, into your (All) hands.
Temporal within ongoing passing through one another aka sprouting/germination/offspring...
Which self is first (original)?
What comes out of the process of dying? Each living one coming to be within. All perceivable implies "input" coming out of process of dying; each ones perception implies living within.
Then, process of dying, (towards) to death, forever and ever back.
"seek an you shall find" .... Living implies resisting the process of dying .... Loss generates growth ; growth re-generates during loss .... Only growth experiences loss .... one being will .... Utilizing guide to grow life
Then, forever and ever back.
Form resisting dominating flow by free will of choice.
Responsible.
If loss of form is partial, then WHOLE could grow...which contradicts whole.
Reality: Form within flow (parts) represent whole. Loss acts/subtracts (to flow) and growth reacts/adds (from flow) upon parts within whole (all).
Each temporary one dies within ever forwarding all.
If each temporary one within, then each one contemporary (con-tempo): forever and ever back. Suggesting each one dies ignores spirit returning (turning fro and back). Forever and ever back implies multiplying tempo both forward and back (within ongoing by division between forward and back).
Just because perceivable implies dying, doesn't mean that ones living perception has to ignore itself for it.
Then, dying implies living: discerning self ....
Temporal matter forwards and back (choice) within momentum (balance) of ongoing motion.
a) All implies first; each one implies second/seco - "to divide"
b) All implies first (inception) and last (death) for each one (life) within.
forever and ever back
Forever and ever implies multiplying forward; while back implies a division...a contradiction.
In reality...forwards (motion) and backwards (matter) are balanced (momentum). The position of being implies backwards within forwarding origin.
Then, forever and ever back.
If "forever and ever back"; then no forwarding of temporal being.
Responsible
Aka reaction (re) enabled (ible) by sponsoring (spons) action.
If each temporary one within, then each one contemporary...
CON (together) contradicts ONE (apart from one another).
Suggesting each one dies ignores
a) Suggestion tempts one to ignore by consent. Few are suggesting to gain consent by many aka the allegory of the vampire asking for permission to enter.
To ask another implies the temptation to ignore perceivable all for a suggestion by another one...that requires resistance.
b) Inception implies death for ones perceiving life, because all perceivable moves, hence directing input through one, which diminishes ones resistance through velocity.
spirit returning (turning fro and back
Spirit doesn't respond to a turn; ones response implies the turn within directed spirit, and as a reacting choice within an enacting balance, one struggles fro and back to sustain self.
Few are tempting many with suggested spiritualism to consent and hold onto "spirit" as a possession, all while ignoring that breathing implies the need to let go.
implies multiplying tempo
a) Implication (if/then) requires the same velocity so that different resistances within can utilize it to discern self.
b) If all is one in energy, then multiplication can only happen after the division of all (whole) into ones (partials), because only then can intercourse for off-spring multiply being.
c) Tempo/temporal/ten - "to stretch" implies ones free will of choice to balance (increase/reduce) different forms of resistance during the same flow of velocity.
Only within the momentum of motion can matter stretch...stretching partials cannot increase or decrease whole.
Then, dying implies living: discerning self...
...if one chooses to discern self by adapting to perceivable, while resisting consent to suggested.
Forever and ever implies multiplying forward; while back implies a division...a contradiction. In reality...forwards (motion) and backwards (matter) are balanced (momentum). The position of being implies backwards within forwarding origin .... If "forever and ever back"; then no forwarding of temporal being.
For ever implies multiplying forward, back ever implies dividing backward, dividing balances multiplying. "Backwards (father) within forwarding (son)."
CON (together) contradicts ONE (apart from one another).
Con-tra-dicts? "Temporary one ... within" implies "temporary one con-", in:
Each temporary one dies within ever forwarding all.
Inception implies death
Inception implies dying; then, each temporary dying one, and each temporary dying within, balanced.
Spirit doesn't respond to a turn
"Shall the dust return ...: and the spirit shall return." Spirit turns fro, and turns back. Exhale and inhale, enact and react?
Implication (if/then) requires the same velocity
Then, for ever and back ever implies tempos (times) multiply forward, and multiply back (divides). Velocity changes, implication adapts.
stretching partials cannot increase or decrease whole
Stretching partials (contemporaries) increases, and can decrease, partials.
Responsible.
Then, Origin.
Jesus Christ.
Then, All shows All (Him). What is "each different self"?
Then, how could one perceive death coming out?
Who requires or wants? Does resistance process life?
Does each one cease? Then, all would be lost.
What else?
Then, the dying process represents transformation. How could a dying outcome represent or perceptibly come out?
Then, flow and resist, free and dominated.
What if loss of form is partial? One could die forever.
Perceptive. Dying forever and ever ....
Then, for ever, and ever (back).
Accepting death by the hands of others doesn't quite trigger the "will over respiration" achievement...
To show implies to perceive, hence by one within all. All cannot perceive all, because perception implies differentiation of all into ones.
Temporal within ongoing passing through one another aka sprouting/germination/offspring...
What comes out of the process of dying? Each living one coming to be within. All perceivable implies "input" coming out of process of dying; each ones perception implies living within.
a) One who needs wants to ignore it.
b) One who responds to seeking (re-quire) aims at suggested outcomes, while ignoring perceivable FOUNDation, hence "seek an you shall find".
Living implies resisting the process of dying, which tempts one to ignore resisting. Resistance implies ones re-sponding stance within velocity as choice within balance.
a) Loss generates growth ; growth re-generates during loss.
b) Motion (all) utilizes momentum to generate matter (one)...only matter coming to be within momentum experiences growth (living) during loss (dying).
c) All implies generation of loss (action) and growth (reactions) internally. Only growth experiences loss.
d) Where would all lose ones to? Only ones can lose themselves within all.
e) All would be contradicts one being will.
Utilizing guide to grow life, while others chase after death. To guide implies to direct...nature directs being; being reacts (life) to direction (inception towards death) by resisting the temptation thereof.
...of living.
a) Because each one comes out alive into the process of dying, before being moved back into it...
b) Having perception implies that one came out of perceivable...circumference (motion) generates center (matter).
Form resisting dominating flow by free will of choice.
If loss of form is partial, then WHOLE could grow...which contradicts whole. This line of thinking is based on ones consent to creationism, which suggests the whole creation and then some aka one creator added to all creation.
In reality...ONEs addition (inception); subtraction (death); multiplication (intercourse for off-spring) and division (whole into partials) can only operate within ALL.
Each temporary one dies within ever forwarding all.
That implies multiplying "ongoing", while ignoring that only temporal can be multiplied within ongoing by division.
In that line of thinking...addition (living) during subtraction (dying).
Just because perceivable implies dying, doesn't mean that ones living perception has to ignore itself for it.
Temporal matter forwards and back (choice) within momentum (balance) of ongoing motion.
Spirit, into your (All) hands.
Which self is first (original)?
Then, process of dying, (towards) to death, forever and ever back.
Then, forever and ever back.
Responsible.
Reality: Form within flow (parts) represent whole. Loss acts/subtracts (to flow) and growth reacts/adds (from flow) upon parts within whole (all).
If each temporary one within, then each one contemporary (con-tempo): forever and ever back. Suggesting each one dies ignores spirit returning (turning fro and back). Forever and ever back implies multiplying tempo both forward and back (within ongoing by division between forward and back).
Then, dying implies living: discerning self ....
All through spirit into one...
a) All implies first; each one implies second/seco - "to divide"
b) All implies first (inception) and last (death) for each one (life) within.
Forever and ever implies multiplying forward; while back implies a division...a contradiction.
In reality...forwards (motion) and backwards (matter) are balanced (momentum). The position of being implies backwards within forwarding origin.
If "forever and ever back"; then no forwarding of temporal being.
Aka reaction (re) enabled (ible) by sponsoring (spons) action.
CON (together) contradicts ONE (apart from one another).
a) Suggestion tempts one to ignore by consent. Few are suggesting to gain consent by many aka the allegory of the vampire asking for permission to enter.
To ask another implies the temptation to ignore perceivable all for a suggestion by another one...that requires resistance.
b) Inception implies death for ones perceiving life, because all perceivable moves, hence directing input through one, which diminishes ones resistance through velocity.
Spirit doesn't respond to a turn; ones response implies the turn within directed spirit, and as a reacting choice within an enacting balance, one struggles fro and back to sustain self.
Few are tempting many with suggested spiritualism to consent and hold onto "spirit" as a possession, all while ignoring that breathing implies the need to let go.
a) Implication (if/then) requires the same velocity so that different resistances within can utilize it to discern self.
b) If all is one in energy, then multiplication can only happen after the division of all (whole) into ones (partials), because only then can intercourse for off-spring multiply being.
c) Tempo/temporal/ten - "to stretch" implies ones free will of choice to balance (increase/reduce) different forms of resistance during the same flow of velocity.
Only within the momentum of motion can matter stretch...stretching partials cannot increase or decrease whole.
...if one chooses to discern self by adapting to perceivable, while resisting consent to suggested.
For ever implies multiplying forward, back ever implies dividing backward, dividing balances multiplying. "Backwards (father) within forwarding (son)."
Con-tra-dicts? "Temporary one ... within" implies "temporary one con-", in:
Inception implies dying; then, each temporary dying one, and each temporary dying within, balanced.
"Shall the dust return ...: and the spirit shall return." Spirit turns fro, and turns back. Exhale and inhale, enact and react?
Then, for ever and back ever implies tempos (times) multiply forward, and multiply back (divides). Velocity changes, implication adapts.
Stretching partials (contemporaries) increases, and can decrease, partials.