The term "conspiracy theorist" is a pejorative.
I don't see the part where they're begging for votes.
I don't think she is trying to conceal her opinion.
It depends on where you go, but if you hang out in a small place you get to see that certain narratives are vociferously defended. They tend to coincide with certain things that you see in other places, then you can connect the dots. It's still plausible that they are trolls, I guess. You have to use your own discenrment case-by-case.
One Islamophobic remark and another one pointing out that "from the river to the sea" is used on both sides of the Israel-Palestine issue. That's not much of a pattern if you ask me.
How does any of that indicate that he is cooperating with embedded government agents?
Don't you see how you have set up a situation where you blame all content for and against Jewish issues as being shill posts supporting the Jewish side?
Or they might have nothing to do with Jewish people or Zionism.
What I don't see are posts or comments that support Israeli objectives. The only thing I can think of is content that gets the word out about what's happening in Gaza so as to draw Iran into the conflict.
I think the (vast?) majority of posts and comments on this board are by shills/volunteers and trolls. That is not to say that I think they are working on behalf of Israel. I base my opinion on what they write.
As for me going out and doing the research you demand, I can do this when I have free time. The first time, if I recall, you were trying to get me to read about self-assembling nanotechnology in the COVID-19 shots. I already know about the three things you just told me to research.
I don't have to go on some gish gallop where I do X, Y, and Z, read up on barely relevant topics and watch hours of footage of your choosing before commenting on a topic.
It should be stable, but money has a "time value." What that means is that the present value of some amount of money has more value today than the future value of the same amount to be received at some future date. That's because in capitalism you can use that money today as capital to realize earning potential. This is even ignoring the risk that you won't even receive the promised money due to unforseen factors.
Regarding stability, intrinsic value/commodity backing adds another factor of instability, e.g. it being profitable to melt coins for the metal.
This is absurd. I don't see any reason to doubt that this person exists, and public calls to commit arson should be prosecuted.
One good thing about these posts are that it identifies some of the fake accounts here.
When I was in China, I saw lots of homeless people behind train stations. That was a long time ago.
In China, impoverished farmers line up for kilometers to be sent through a very, very long factory corridor. When there are enough workers to fill all the positions, the door is shut and the people left in line have to come back tomorrow. That was also a long time ago.
This sort of thing is nothing new in China. China's economy is juiced by actual slave labor, often in the form of political prisoners picking and processing cotton and textiles. Other industries are also rife with slavery, like brickworks. When China couldn't turn a blind eye to this any longer, they simply moved operations to places like Myanmar to import the slave-made bricks from there. This reduces the cost of manufactured goods to where it's impossible to beat their prices in places that don't have some slavery contributing to the economy.
Low amounts of money can buy a lot in China and tight government control on the value of Chinese money has made the system sustainable. It lets China pay their workers very low subsistence wages, subject them to unsafe and unhealthy working conditions that would be illegal in the markets they sell to, and cause invironmental damage that would also be illegal if it were to happen where Chinese goods are sold abroad.
Slavery is unconstitutional in the United States of America. Decoupling from China would be very difficult and costly to the US economy. I believe a small tariff that gets a bit higher every year on Chinese goods until they can demonstrably remove slavery from their economic system is the morally correct thing to do.
Fake upvotes.
Arnold Murray Pulls a 9 mm Gun https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UN16pSVbHGM
The claim is that he's somehow working with plainclothes federal agents to infiltrate protests.
Where? Show me their talking points.
You thought they were talking about network segments?
What's been found? I just see this as a setup.
That's a tired argument. I've seen propaganda on game chats, tiny niche forums and even obscure IRC channels.
The whole thing is an operation to discredit Robinson.
Step 1) "Hey, I love what you're doing. Can I get a selfie together?" Step 2) Film the meaningless nod thing along with a police officer. Step 3) Create a video where OMG we caught a fed in the crowd! Step 4) Release the selfie shot to connect the dots you drew yourself.
I don't think trying to bankrupt someone, put them in jail and literally assissinate that person is bulding them up in any way.
This is by design. I have seen a large number of videos that follow this formula or something similar to it.
I went to the Occupy protest in Amsterdam and saw someone pretending to be crazy and drawing attention to themselves. I then saw a video from Occupy Wall Street and there was someone behaving in an identical manner trying to become the focus of what was being filmed.
This is not what they are talking about.
There is a list of characteristics of money. Generally a store of value and a unit of account. Good money is transportable, divisible, durable, limited in supply and accepted by others as a medium of exchange. There are other considerations as well, but having intrinsic value or being backed by some real commodity is not among them
This is a fine example of the conspiracy to prevent truthful information from going viral. The ability for people to share information is so powerful that it cannot go unmolested by the already powerful.
The TikTok watermark in the background was removed, and the end of the video that shows the platform/username were both removed to prevent attribution. The audio was then removed, and the entire video was given a poor-quality, exceedingly boring wrapper that was ten times longer than the original content and misdirected people to Instagram (saying it didn't matter if it was Instagram or TikTok) to prevent people from even getting the message. That was all in a concerted effort to suppress this.
Conspiracies.win post about the original content:
This is the most insane example of how everyone is experiencing completely different social medias at the exact same time. https://conspiracies.win/p/17txfJXF2n/