1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes it does. The only problem is that they managed to observe 1) the same pathology, 2) the same particles under a microscope and 3) got the same RNA sequence of the sars, AIDS and flu viruses WITHOUT USING AN ACTUAL SAMPLE OF INFECTED TISSUE. They used yeast RNA instead, which is neutral and doesn't cause pathology. That's why I called it a falsification of the virus theory - this should not be possible if the theory was correct.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's a cool slogan. Can you back it up with any arguments? Do you know what are the actual arguments made by the "virus deniers"?

If you can get the rubes to think "viruses don't exist" then everything people like Geert are saying is null and void. No viruses = no covid = no bioweapons = no shedding = NO CRIMINALS RESPONSIBLE FOR IT ALL. Gee... why would the perpetrators of all want to push out a narrative like that...

That does not follow. No viruses doesn't mean there's no covid disease caused by other mechanisms, neither does it mean there are no bioweapons - on the contrary, it completely demolishes the possibility of covid being of natural origin or an accidental leak. The shots are bioweapons, we can all agree on that.

So in your head, the sars virus not existing leads to zero accountability for the people who made it up and convinced everyone it was a deadly threat, locked down and force vaccinated the whole world causing millions to die? Make that make sense.

That's why conspiracy theorizing ain't for everyone.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Correct but I was asking about the methodology. As shown here (the falsification of the "isolation" of the virus): https://odysee.com/@spacebusters:c9/Final-The-End-of-Germ-Theory:8?t=5666

Only if people cared about science instead of scientism.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's a non-sequiter. Sounds like "I was a big believer in God, but then I saw a bunch of monkeys and realized we were just like them, only slightly evolved". You're presupposing the thing you "caught" is a transmissible disease caused by a virus. How does getting sick negate terrain theory? Does terrain theory deny the existence of flu-like diseases?

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

How would one prove that a given particle is the cause of the disease, that it's self-replicating and it is able to infect other hosts?

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just post the links here dude. I don't need a struggle session 1 on 1.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Heavy metals, industrial chemicals, microplastics, BPA, pesticides, biotoxins, anti-nutrients, hormone disruptors, seed oils, refined sugars and fake foods in general. Anything that doesn't belong in the body and is pathogenetic.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why not post it here? I don't do Jewgle meet.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

I will as soon as you link me those papers.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +3 / -1

Is this "anyone who writes something I disagree with is a shill" logic once again? That's the most shill-like behavior there is. You need to update the info-control protocol at the academy.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

They use those but most missiles get taken out by anti-missile defense.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't know about bacteria. Toxic substances that enter your body. Also forgot to mention nutrient deficiencies and psychological stress as a cause. Electromagnetic radiation is a possible cause too.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's the mirror, dear.

0
SmithW1984 0 points ago +1 / -1

You missed the third option of them being correct, Dunning-Kruger poster boy.

Produce the papers proving the existence of a virus or gtfo with your regurgitated reddit-tier rhetoric (muh Dunning-Kruger).

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

👇 This is gonna summon them: "BuT VIRUSES aReNt ReaL!!!"

I remember being annoyed with those people during the coof. Then, seeing how mainstream medical science is the mostly fake and gay, I decided to give it a chance and looked into it. Once you do, there's no turning back to normieland. If you've seen through the covid hoax, chances are you'll see through the virus hoax too, but you have to be curious enough to hear their case.

https://odysee.com/@spacebusters:c9/Final-The-End-of-Germ-Theory:8

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you consider toxic environment and parasites nothing, then yes.

3
SmithW1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

The irony is most people are already gone in their head. Why even bother depoping the sheeple?

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Koch postulates are arbitrary now? You're hitting new lows.

Watch this or shut up: https://odysee.com/@spacebusters:c9/Final-The-End-of-Germ-Theory:8?t=9269.5073

3
SmithW1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

Here's the guy who spied on Pfizer and handed the tapes to PV and they screwed him over: https://justintegrity.net/

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

It made me realize it's not about rational thought or information - it's about unwillingness to accept truth, rejecting the truth hitting you in the face. It's a moral ailment, not a rational one. I think this is part of what ultimately convinced me God is real and we are presented with a choice.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is a way to isolate/purify the supposed particle they call virus and inoculate it on a healthy subject where it should cause the same symptoms of the disease. Then they should be able to get a sample from that subject and isolate/purify the same particle. If that's done in culture that doesn't contain other genetic material and drugs, then we'll have a proof of a virus according to Koch's postulates. This all follows logically and you don't have to be a medical scientist to see that. It's never been done though. Not a single paper.

Look for yourself: https://odysee.com/@spacebusters:c9/Final-The-End-of-Germ-Theory:8?t=9269.5073

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok, that's good to know.

Still there is a way to isolate/purify the supposed particle they call virus and inoculate it on a healthy subject where it should cause the same symptoms of the disease. Then they should be able to get a sample from that subject and isolate/purify the same particle. If that's done in culture that doesn't contain other genetic material and drugs, then we'll have a proof of a virus according to Koch's postulates. It's never been done though.

Not a single paper.

0
SmithW1984 0 points ago +2 / -2

It's Winston from the Ministry of Truth here to give you the facts.

I don't know what causes it, but a particle, claimed to be a virus, has never been isolated/purified and proven to be the cause of disease according to Koch's postulates and that's a scientific fact.

If you have papers proving the opposite, please share them, but don't talk to me how "we know now", "muh science" or brushing off legitimate skepticism as "flat earth" when we all know this is exactly the reason why flat earth was promoted. This is a conspiracy forum, chud.

https://odysee.com/@spacebusters:c9/Final-The-End-of-Germ-Theory:8?t=9269.5073

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›