"No virus" theory sets the "proof for viruses" to such level that due to the size of protein aggregates (and as such, "viruses") that no microscopy can EVER IMAGINE and thus no separation method can NEVER separate the claimed protein aggregates to the level that "NO VIRUS" camp requires.
So, as a scientific theory, it is NOT EVEN WRONG.
It may be true, may not be true, but it is NOT falsifiable AND it is not practical in helping us to avoid them poisoning us (we can call the virus protein aggregates, self-replicating peptides, m|mi|si|RNA, DNA or "viruses" - it doesn't matter - they are still poisoning us, as the statistics clearly show).
Or maybe they could inoculate cells containing the supposed virus in culture which doesn't contain other genetic material and proof its existence by following the Koch postulates.
Also, I don't believe there aren't good enough microscopes to see the virions. We have microscopes that magnify to the level of atoms. That's the worst cope I've ever heard since NASA told us they can't go back to the moon because they've lost the technology.
Atomic force and tunneling microscopes cannot imagine living things, they tear them apart and provide a single snapshot. Cannot provide identification nor sequence of things like cell entry.
Super resolution microscopes are the best we have that go anywhere near the resolution limits required to image "viruses" and they don't resolve enough.
Still there is a way to isolate/purify the supposed particle they call virus and inoculate it on a healthy subject where it should cause the same symptoms of the disease. Then they should be able to get a sample from that subject and isolate/purify the same particle. If that's done in culture that doesn't contain other genetic material and drugs, then we'll have a proof of a virus according to Koch's postulates. It's never been done though.
Any theory to be scientific, must be falsifiable.
"No virus" theory sets the "proof for viruses" to such level that due to the size of protein aggregates (and as such, "viruses") that no microscopy can EVER IMAGINE and thus no separation method can NEVER separate the claimed protein aggregates to the level that "NO VIRUS" camp requires.
So, as a scientific theory, it is NOT EVEN WRONG.
It may be true, may not be true, but it is NOT falsifiable AND it is not practical in helping us to avoid them poisoning us (we can call the virus protein aggregates, self-replicating peptides, m|mi|si|RNA, DNA or "viruses" - it doesn't matter - they are still poisoning us, as the statistics clearly show).
Or maybe they could inoculate cells containing the supposed virus in culture which doesn't contain other genetic material and proof its existence by following the Koch postulates.
Also, I don't believe there aren't good enough microscopes to see the virions. We have microscopes that magnify to the level of atoms. That's the worst cope I've ever heard since NASA told us they can't go back to the moon because they've lost the technology.
Atomic force and tunneling microscopes cannot imagine living things, they tear them apart and provide a single snapshot. Cannot provide identification nor sequence of things like cell entry.
Super resolution microscopes are the best we have that go anywhere near the resolution limits required to image "viruses" and they don't resolve enough.
Ok, that's good to know.
Still there is a way to isolate/purify the supposed particle they call virus and inoculate it on a healthy subject where it should cause the same symptoms of the disease. Then they should be able to get a sample from that subject and isolate/purify the same particle. If that's done in culture that doesn't contain other genetic material and drugs, then we'll have a proof of a virus according to Koch's postulates. It's never been done though.
Not a single paper.