You’re right. No one can prove viruses exist and cause humans harm. They’re man-made toxins, not viruses. It’s a terminology issue. Nature only produces parasites and bacteria, which can/does cause humans harm. “Covid” made the idea of viruses even more retarded. The germ theory idea borders on humans landing on the moon 60+ years ago level stupidity now, and no one on this forum can prove viruses exist.
TLDR; We’re being purposefully poisoned by people through man-made toxins, food, water, air, vaccines, medications, everything.
if some bits of code can mimic the real thing, why wouldnt it be real? And if simulations didnt work, I doubt we would have computers or plastics or anything like that. (and before someone says, you need computers to run simulations dur dur). Well no, computers certainly speed the process up so we can see it in real time though.
Our senses can only see a very narrow spectrum of "what is". If we were capable of sensing all the energies that surround us every millisecond of every day, we would go insane, our puny brains could not comprehend everything.
DNA operates much on the same level as the bits in a computer work, but instead of 2 bits, you have 4.
Well how do you supposed we got to this point? Do you believe that a singular god created all this just to give us one little speck of it?
I think its more likely to be a simulation lmao, and even if it was, it wouldnt matter because we are still alive. We are the universe experiencing itself. One of those, if a tree fell in the forest type of deals.
If we really did evolve from a bunch of molecules, either from space, or just randomly appeared here. They still had to work their magic for BILLIONS of years. You can say its fake, but millions of people have dedicated their lives digging through rocks in pursuit of the truth, dont cast it all away because the organization is being gatekeeped by a higher power.
Virus's are the precursor to dna more than likely. And I always have this strange thought that they are some kind of driver to evolution as well.
Why wouldnt what be real? what makes you assume i said viruses or what are you claiming i say is fake? what assumptions are you operating from?
simulations of a life form is unrelated and i cant understand what you are claiming. Also, there is literally NOTHING of substance that you or anyone can provide that logically can conclude it takes BILLIONS of years to make this dirt or these creatures on this dirt. i dont think that means God made it either. I dont know. but its not necessary for billions of years to be a fact of anything.
Viruses are something you think you know about. you dont. trust me. read the books that break down germ theory, and then you'll see if you can still say such things. **there are perfectly and better explanations you are not giving a chance. **
this is not a simulation like you think. its not digital. its biological simulation, our souls are all one, and the All of us experience this world individually through this biological avatars, there is no God, just all of us as one home source energy, no matter what you do here, you go back to it, you cant sell your soul, you can only be tricked into wasting your time here and serving shitheads. All those freemason jewtarded illumipedos use a little esoteric knowledge to enjoy life and take advantage of the herd. you're just in the herd of useless, this isnt our world. this is the ultimate road that flat earth leads to, and ya, im way ahead, but its loney and sad watching all these smart people spin out (as was the design) but, there is no going back, i'd rather see clear than accept the deception.
Well how do you supposed we got to this point? Do you believe that a singular god created all this just to give us one little speck of it?
sno single God, but that all things are one God. make sense? its ok,
one speck? this is the center of the universe, look at Airey's failure. I can use my knowledge of physics combined with deep reasoning and logic and determine without doubt that the stars cannot possibly be what we are told. i dont know what they are, but i know, their masses are probably very small to move as we observe.
"No virus" theory sets the "proof for viruses" to such level that due to the size of protein aggregates (and as such, "viruses") that no microscopy can EVER IMAGINE and thus no separation method can NEVER separate the claimed protein aggregates to the level that "NO VIRUS" camp requires.
So, as a scientific theory, it is NOT EVEN WRONG.
It may be true, may not be true, but it is NOT falsifiable AND it is not practical in helping us to avoid them poisoning us (we can call the virus protein aggregates, self-replicating peptides, m|mi|si|RNA, DNA or "viruses" - it doesn't matter - they are still poisoning us, as the statistics clearly show).
kind of ok...but no. the theory of germs, is wrong. there are toxins which they create and call a virus that can then harm us, but thats a toxin...or weapon. not a virus.
a virus is just cell material expelled at the end of aptosis, making it easy to pee out the dead cell and all its shit. bacteria dont come outside, they are already in you. and when the environment is out of balance, they can change and harmfully so. everything is explained better without virus theory.
So yea, you agree there was never such thing as a contagion virus that causes illness.
Kochs postulate isn't achieved for the virus, no. But toxins are easier to measure tissue damage. Plus, there are lots of things that can easily explain illness besides viruses, and we know bacteria infections come from within, not external exposure.
I should say, they know. I just read their books sources and relay what I learn.
It's not so easy to write you a book right here and now, but I said viruses are cell debris. Harmless and not contagious. You can choose do a shit ton of reading and research and know as best as possible or just remain totally ignorant to the most massive fear controlling hoax ever.
You're in control and decide. I don't want to spend more time trying to convince you to look out for yourself
Or maybe they could inoculate cells containing the supposed virus in culture which doesn't contain other genetic material and proof its existence by following the Koch postulates.
Also, I don't believe there aren't good enough microscopes to see the virions. We have microscopes that magnify to the level of atoms. That's the worst cope I've ever heard since NASA told us they can't go back to the moon because they've lost the technology.
Atomic force and tunneling microscopes cannot imagine living things, they tear them apart and provide a single snapshot. Cannot provide identification nor sequence of things like cell entry.
Super resolution microscopes are the best we have that go anywhere near the resolution limits required to image "viruses" and they don't resolve enough.
Still there is a way to isolate/purify the supposed particle they call virus and inoculate it on a healthy subject where it should cause the same symptoms of the disease. Then they should be able to get a sample from that subject and isolate/purify the same particle. If that's done in culture that doesn't contain other genetic material and drugs, then we'll have a proof of a virus according to Koch's postulates. It's never been done though.
you should actually try harder to learn things you dont know about. ive seen a guy drink a glass with ebola virus, he was fine. ive learned of people that got stuck with HIV needles and were fine. who fucking cares what dumb antecdote we have. just read books from actual doctors that are whistleblowing this shit. there is a perfectly reasonable explaination. hear them out
What theory? The theory that virus theory is wrong, is wrong?
Look, facts are facts, this is science. We have hundreds of thousands of studies that show what things hurt humans, but there are no studies that can prove virus hurt humans.
This is not my fault. Take a deep dive and commit to at least listening to one book that presents the case against germ theory.
Terrain theory is just a word that is used to make gullible people think there is a separate theory that people have to prove. It's just debunking virus theory, that is all.
You should rely on your own inquisition. I have no skin in the game if you choose to ignore the message.
Don't make assumptions about books you don't even know the title of. You are so confident that you can't learn anything from me or anything if it's against your precious virus cult.
The books I read are medical journalism, scientific researchers who site their sources. You know, books by doctors and scienctists with integrity. Not opinions by politicial talking heads
You’re right. No one can prove viruses exist and cause humans harm. They’re man-made toxins, not viruses. It’s a terminology issue. Nature only produces parasites and bacteria, which can/does cause humans harm. “Covid” made the idea of viruses even more retarded. The germ theory idea borders on humans landing on the moon 60+ years ago level stupidity now, and no one on this forum can prove viruses exist.
TLDR; We’re being purposefully poisoned by people through man-made toxins, food, water, air, vaccines, medications, everything.
Omg! Another intelligent person in the wild! Amazing. This forum is loaded with fake accounts and closed minded retards.
Nice to know I'm not totally alone
Downvote this post if you are retard
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Kx4Y9TVMGg
if some bits of code can mimic the real thing, why wouldnt it be real? And if simulations didnt work, I doubt we would have computers or plastics or anything like that. (and before someone says, you need computers to run simulations dur dur). Well no, computers certainly speed the process up so we can see it in real time though.
https://np.reddit.com/r/AskEngineers/comments/1syr0a/how_did_engineers_work_when_computer_didnt_exist/
Our senses can only see a very narrow spectrum of "what is". If we were capable of sensing all the energies that surround us every millisecond of every day, we would go insane, our puny brains could not comprehend everything.
DNA operates much on the same level as the bits in a computer work, but instead of 2 bits, you have 4.
https://berthub.eu/articles/posts/amazing-dna/
Why am I bringing this up?
Well how do you supposed we got to this point? Do you believe that a singular god created all this just to give us one little speck of it?
I think its more likely to be a simulation lmao, and even if it was, it wouldnt matter because we are still alive. We are the universe experiencing itself. One of those, if a tree fell in the forest type of deals.
If we really did evolve from a bunch of molecules, either from space, or just randomly appeared here. They still had to work their magic for BILLIONS of years. You can say its fake, but millions of people have dedicated their lives digging through rocks in pursuit of the truth, dont cast it all away because the organization is being gatekeeped by a higher power.
Virus's are the precursor to dna more than likely. And I always have this strange thought that they are some kind of driver to evolution as well.
Why wouldnt what be real? what makes you assume i said viruses or what are you claiming i say is fake? what assumptions are you operating from?
simulations of a life form is unrelated and i cant understand what you are claiming. Also, there is literally NOTHING of substance that you or anyone can provide that logically can conclude it takes BILLIONS of years to make this dirt or these creatures on this dirt. i dont think that means God made it either. I dont know. but its not necessary for billions of years to be a fact of anything.
Viruses are something you think you know about. you dont. trust me. read the books that break down germ theory, and then you'll see if you can still say such things. **there are perfectly and better explanations you are not giving a chance. **
this is not a simulation like you think. its not digital. its biological simulation, our souls are all one, and the All of us experience this world individually through this biological avatars, there is no God, just all of us as one home source energy, no matter what you do here, you go back to it, you cant sell your soul, you can only be tricked into wasting your time here and serving shitheads. All those freemason jewtarded illumipedos use a little esoteric knowledge to enjoy life and take advantage of the herd. you're just in the herd of useless, this isnt our world. this is the ultimate road that flat earth leads to, and ya, im way ahead, but its loney and sad watching all these smart people spin out (as was the design) but, there is no going back, i'd rather see clear than accept the deception.
sno single God, but that all things are one God. make sense? its ok,
one speck? this is the center of the universe, look at Airey's failure. I can use my knowledge of physics combined with deep reasoning and logic and determine without doubt that the stars cannot possibly be what we are told. i dont know what they are, but i know, their masses are probably very small to move as we observe.
Any theory to be scientific, must be falsifiable.
"No virus" theory sets the "proof for viruses" to such level that due to the size of protein aggregates (and as such, "viruses") that no microscopy can EVER IMAGINE and thus no separation method can NEVER separate the claimed protein aggregates to the level that "NO VIRUS" camp requires.
So, as a scientific theory, it is NOT EVEN WRONG.
It may be true, may not be true, but it is NOT falsifiable AND it is not practical in helping us to avoid them poisoning us (we can call the virus protein aggregates, self-replicating peptides, m|mi|si|RNA, DNA or "viruses" - it doesn't matter - they are still poisoning us, as the statistics clearly show).
kind of ok...but no. the theory of germs, is wrong. there are toxins which they create and call a virus that can then harm us, but thats a toxin...or weapon. not a virus.
a virus is just cell material expelled at the end of aptosis, making it easy to pee out the dead cell and all its shit. bacteria dont come outside, they are already in you. and when the environment is out of balance, they can change and harmfully so. everything is explained better without virus theory.
How do you know?
Have you singularly isolated such "toxin"?
Do you have microscope video showing such "toxin" entering the cell and causing illness?
Use the exact same criteria for "toxin" as you use for "virus" or anything below 10nm (resolving power of live imaging super resolution microscopes).
but Alas, we do agrees: They are poisoning us. We just can't "prove" with 100% certainty what "it" is that they are poisoning us with.
And in the end, it is a moot point. They are still poisoning us. That much even the raw statistics show us.
So yea, you agree there was never such thing as a contagion virus that causes illness.
Kochs postulate isn't achieved for the virus, no. But toxins are easier to measure tissue damage. Plus, there are lots of things that can easily explain illness besides viruses, and we know bacteria infections come from within, not external exposure.
I should say, they know. I just read their books sources and relay what I learn.
No, I use multivalued logic to reason.
I stay firmly in the "show me more proof" camp and "show me a theory that can be falsified".
Until that is shown, I stay in the excluded middle.
There are always more options than two. Most people fail to understand this.
That's what this post is. The proof.
It's not so easy to write you a book right here and now, but I said viruses are cell debris. Harmless and not contagious. You can choose do a shit ton of reading and research and know as best as possible or just remain totally ignorant to the most massive fear controlling hoax ever.
You're in control and decide. I don't want to spend more time trying to convince you to look out for yourself
You didn't post such thing. You need to understand how scientific proof works.
You posted a possible refutation with too much claims and no proof to back it up.
Look, I've been down that rabbit hole longer than you known it existed.
And I still haven't found proof. SO I stay in the excluded middle.
You are free to believe as you wish.
Or maybe they could inoculate cells containing the supposed virus in culture which doesn't contain other genetic material and proof its existence by following the Koch postulates.
Also, I don't believe there aren't good enough microscopes to see the virions. We have microscopes that magnify to the level of atoms. That's the worst cope I've ever heard since NASA told us they can't go back to the moon because they've lost the technology.
Atomic force and tunneling microscopes cannot imagine living things, they tear them apart and provide a single snapshot. Cannot provide identification nor sequence of things like cell entry.
Super resolution microscopes are the best we have that go anywhere near the resolution limits required to image "viruses" and they don't resolve enough.
Ok, that's good to know.
Still there is a way to isolate/purify the supposed particle they call virus and inoculate it on a healthy subject where it should cause the same symptoms of the disease. Then they should be able to get a sample from that subject and isolate/purify the same particle. If that's done in culture that doesn't contain other genetic material and drugs, then we'll have a proof of a virus according to Koch's postulates. It's never been done though.
Not a single paper.
you should actually try harder to learn things you dont know about. ive seen a guy drink a glass with ebola virus, he was fine. ive learned of people that got stuck with HIV needles and were fine. who fucking cares what dumb antecdote we have. just read books from actual doctors that are whistleblowing this shit. there is a perfectly reasonable explaination. hear them out
What theory? The theory that virus theory is wrong, is wrong?
Look, facts are facts, this is science. We have hundreds of thousands of studies that show what things hurt humans, but there are no studies that can prove virus hurt humans.
This is not my fault. Take a deep dive and commit to at least listening to one book that presents the case against germ theory.
Terrain theory is just a word that is used to make gullible people think there is a separate theory that people have to prove. It's just debunking virus theory, that is all.
You should rely on your own inquisition. I have no skin in the game if you choose to ignore the message.
Don't make assumptions about books you don't even know the title of. You are so confident that you can't learn anything from me or anything if it's against your precious virus cult.
The books I read are medical journalism, scientific researchers who site their sources. You know, books by doctors and scienctists with integrity. Not opinions by politicial talking heads