Then we'll have Eurasia-Oceania-Eastasia situation where all are equally bad and in constant conflict that serves to justify tyranny, depop and austerity. Again, unless the masonic jewish central banks are annihilated there's no moving forward.
Good points but you miss the part where the Fed and Wall Str. own the dollar. There's no decoupling going on - this is the heart of the fake and gay global economic system, the push for technocracy and globalization. They own your ass. There's no escape unless the fiat based usury system is completely dismantled and that ain't happening.
The only alternative is a decentralized finite open-source crypto like BTC but most conspiracytards think it's CBDC or the mark of the beast, because they've been overwhelmed the last several years (which is part of the plan of course).
How do you "solve a conspiracy"?
"Everything is fake" is low-IQ conspiracytard take. This is exactly the level of confusion and demoralization tptb want you to be in. Smart conspiracy researchers have discernment of what is definitely fake, what is up for debate and what is most likely true based on evidence and reason.
This takes a lot of effort, reading, thinking and observation and let's face it - most conspiracytards aren't up to the task. How many people can even read a normie level book today, let alone an academic-level 1000-pager on geopolitics and how many of those are inclined towards researching this stuff and uncovering the truth? Pure stats shows you they can print all they want in their books and still almost no one would be able to understand it or care about it.
Add every transnational organization to the list.
No, you just have wrong theology. As I explained, all evil is uncreated and has no ontological existence. God didn't create hate and there was no hate in the world before the fall. Human emotions in our fallen world serve a function and when they're misused and misguided, they lead to sin. You can fight your enemy without hating him, and what we're called to hate is not the person but their sin. You interpret that as cuckery because you don't understand Christianity. Christianity is a religion of warriors more than any other. Idk what your alternative is, but if it's atheism this is the one that is most cucked, because it's nihilistic and there's literally no point in anything, including being courageous and fighting for a cause.
How can you compare todays media (which includes forums like this btw) to legacy media, when you lack the information of what media were like at the time I'm talking about?
But I guess it's easier to call me stupid and not think about it instead.
Dude, the government had full control of the media back in the time you talk about. There are countless books written on this about OSS war propaganda and Tavistock and later CIA involvement through Mockingbird and MK Ultra. This model was exported to the US from the British empire, namely the Milner-Rhodes-Rotschild circle of fabian socialists who ran Britain in the early 20th century.
These people create the news narratives, opinion pieces, psy ops, fake polls, etc and feed them to the mainstream media outlets. I know what I'm talking about and have the receipts. This is how they handle business for more than a century now.
What do you think this means?
Everybody knows awards are a psy op. Think about the Noble, the Grammys, the Oscars... Even normies these days are getting wise to this.
“Never wrestle with pigs. You both get dirty and the pig likes it.”
I don't have the time or the patience to argue theology with sub-zero IQ heretic, who I already know to be a troll.
Go worship your Bible, prot tard.
Your presupposition that there was a time when the media wasn't owned by a small elite group of people is wrong. Just because the consolidation wasn't official doesn't mean they didn't have a hold on the media. My point still stands - we have access to much more information about what's going on than in previous times.
You don't know what "jacobin" is, do you? But please, tell me more about your talmudic interpretation of history. What you missed is that Byzantium and other Christian monarchies banished and prosecuted the jews and that one of the main reasons of the "people's revolutions" starting with the one in England and Oliver Cromwell, going to the jacobins and their Red Terror and culminating in the Bolshevik one was to topple said monarchies and reintroduce jewish power and masonic (read kabbalistic and talmudic) ideas in those countries.
You're welcome for the quick history lesson.
You mean why pagan Rome fell? Yes, it became degenerate and weak but it was saved by Emperor Constantine who established the longest lasting empire in history while continuing the Roman tradition but in Christian context. Thus Rome continued to live on until the 15th century and the Ottoman invasion.
No, that would be dualism and it's heretical. Christians are not freemasons and we don't engage in dialectics (black and white checkerboard; two sides of the same coin; God and Satan being evenly matched and in an eternal battle over the world).
Love doesn't necessitate hate. Evil has no ontological existence, it's just the absence of the good (God), just like darkness is the absence of light and death is the absence of life.
That's a word-concept fallacy. What is meant by "hate sin" is not the human emotion of hatred but intolerance to sin and unwillingness to compromise with the Truth. Same goes for jealousy. The Church Fathers teach us that all our predispositions can be directed properly or improperly which decides whether they are virtues or vices. Religious fervor and piety are virtues, jealousy and envy are vices (except when used out of their usual context in figurative speech as in "jealousy over the true faith").
What? How is hate and jealousy godly? No Christian is ever called to hate even his enemies, even if hatred is justified by pure evil. Christ is the way and the life - we gain eternal life in Him.
And they'll say, yes, we can do that, this is an emergency, but in return, we need to slash and burn the size of government.
Why is that bad? I don't get what the conspiracy is.
What's this normie bs? "Muh dark ages" is a jewish revisionist history narrative. People who know basic history know that jews were behind all major revolutions that toppled the monarchies and the feudal rule. They called it communism, then republicanism and now it's called democracy but it's always been a masonic talmudic technocracy. Jews were always waging war against the Christian monarchies and their puppets churned out loads of propaganda painting their enemies (Church and monarchy) as backwards, barbaric, unjust, unenlightened and tyrannical.
And you bought their Enlightenment era propaganda too despite all the information available. Go educate yourself.
Yahweh is Jesus - the one who told the hebrews not to worship pagan gods like Baal.
He looks like Sacha Baron Cohen. But it's more about his lady looking a bit manly.
BREAKING NEWS: Reddit being reddit
It's not propaganda, redditors are genuinely like that. Btw you can see his wife was more masculine than him from the get go.
It's the other way around - we have access to much more information today compared to the boomer era. Media back then was consolidated and centralized and there was almost no alternative outlets. They only played the fake dialectic which fooled people there's free speech and criticism of the system and that corrupt entities including the government won't get away with egregious shit because there's free investigative journalism that would expose them (as if those journalists weren't on a payroll and weren't CIA Mockingbird implants).
Media control is one of the pillars of any regime, especially fabian socialists who got the reigns before and after the war and turned this country (and the rest of the world for that matter) to shit.
Nowhere is the essence of media at the time better presented than in this scene from Network: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35DSdw7dHjs
The doctrines of grace and faith alone assume you're saved simply by believing in Christ and by His grace, rather than those plus following God's law, doing deeds and participating in the divine mysteries ordinated by Christ and by His Church.
But everything is His since He created everything ex nihilo and His divine mind grounds all existence. There's no notion of possession for God. He has no needs or desires (in a human way) which jealousy presupposes.
What it means is that God doesn't commands His people not to have other gods and idols so He calls Himself jealous so that we can understand this through our human sensibilities. It's an analogy - God is not literally jealous. This seems like a problem of anthropomorphizing God, but His divine nature is nothing like our human nature.