That's nice as it aligns with what the One world government (UN, Club of Rome, WEF) teaches. We need them to save us from ourselves and save the planet. The best harmony will be achieved by depop, gene engineering, getting people hooked on Skynet and breeding them in artificial wombs. This is what the good philanthropists and science experts are saying we have to do to save the climate and mommy Earf.
Peak schizo post. What if gayliens are our frens? How did you determine they are evil and want to probe your ass as part of some sick experimentation? Maybe it's just an expression of love and we ought to be like them?
What if you were programmed to think and disseminate your demented truther new age ideas as a part of the whole plan of gaylien world domination?
Just asking questions here as a fellow skeptic.
What exactly? What I said is a description of reality, not a claim on how society ought to be ran. It's the case that whoever is in control decides what's harmful and what's degenerate. Every single society has been that way.
That's a non-sequitur - can't a think tank with a few thousand members be part of TPTB? What do you think TPTB is?
What you describe was possible before the 20th century, that is before the advent of advertisement and mass social engineering. From Bernays onwards, a method of selling low quality goods that people don't really need was worked out. They saw they could create the product and then convince people it was valuable because in the NWO only individual human and societal perception defines what's valuable, as opposed to unchanging universal good (that's an entailment of the humanist worldview).
This is how we got to where are we today where consumers have been engineered to go after low quality products because they're easier to manufacture (this applies mostly to cultural products and not tech). There are other reasons behind promotion of degenerate culture of course but we're focused on the economical side.
Without destruction of that profit-drive that rule over economy, even good, God-following people, will not be able to compete or get rid of corporations that will suck them dry eventually. In the best case you could build something like Amish community, but that's not really human development, it is degradation or at least stagnation, with all my respect to Amishes.
The Amish are against technology and they are arbitrary stuck at a fixed time in the 19th century as if that reflects Christian historic tradition in some way. There is a way to foster technological progress in a Christian society and this has been the case with the longest surviving empire there was - the Byzantine empire, governed by the principle of symphonia. There is nothing wrong with technology or manufacturing of goods as long as the principles governing them are sound.
It's all about hierarchy - one can't serve to both Mammon and God. Today's society is governed by greed and Mammon and the only thing it develops towards is its own demise and degradation. Technological development and consumption cannot be an end in itself. It's always governed by an underlying moral principle and conviction. Technology is supposed to serve man and not enslave him or prevent him communion with God - this is true progress.
Yes, but it challenges the whole paradigm:
Accept that the purpose of life is not consuming and acquiring goods and that man is a spiritual and a moral being that transcends this world first and homo economicus material being in this world second. Such a society will be driven by economy of virtue and duty and not by economy of goods and services catering to our desires. Such a society actually exists and has always existed within the Christian Church but sadly we're a minority in our degenerate times.
Whoever is in control of the state. This is how government always works.
From a philosophical lens, I believe morality has universal existence and is not relative to the society or individual.
Do you even read what you're replying to? The Fabian Society is one of the TPTB organizations I listed. I linked you an article about Charlie Chaplin on their website.
I didn't make the claim but the implication was that media has portrayed Chaplin favorably and the media is controlled by those organizations especially during the war.
His views seem to align with fabian socialism so it makes sense he was used to propagandize the cause. And what do you know - my hunch proves to be correct: https://fabians.org.uk/the-little-tramp-of-the-left/
When you know the big picture stuff, small details like this fall into place easily. If you were truly curious and not just a shill you would be reading the copious information available instead of asking reddit tier questions "wHo aRe tHeY?!? nAmE tHeM!!!"
I'm not a lolbertarian free speech absolutist so you're not really putting me on the spot with that question. I think harmful and degenerate content should be censored.
You want me to name a hundred plus people? It'd be easier to name the organizations they are affiliated to - CIA, CFR, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg, MIT, SRI, The Institute for Social Research, Rand Corp, Tavistock, Aspen Institute, Carnegie Foundation, Gates Foundation, RIIA (Chatham House), MI6, ADL, WHO, DARPA, WEF, UN, EU, NATO, IMF, Bank of England, LSE, the Fabian society, BIS, the Fed. That's from the top of my head but there are more.
Talmudic jews are sectarians from the true Abrahamic faith, which is kept by the Church. The Torah (OT) has been fulfilled by the coming of the messiah, who is God in flesh who made a new covenant with all nations because it was prophesized in the OT that the initial "chosen people" would reject God and kill their messiah, which they did. This is how gentile converts became the new chosen people who will inherit the Kingdom of God. Any other reading of it is a jewed up perversion and is straight up ignorance of history (looking at you, Adam Green pagan larpers). Christianity is not jewish (in the modern sense of judaism), but the other way around - the true hebrew faith IS Christianity.
The Anglo-American establishment as described by prof. Quigley, I. Ratiu, A. Sutton and E. Mullins in their books.
problem-reaction-solution
Depends on what content would be blocked and what the reasons are.
Do you think that governments should control the content of the internet?
Dude, we're on a conspiracy forum. Everyone here knows the net is controlled and surveilled by the government. Today's internet is google, porn sites, wikipedia and a few social medias and they're all ran by jewish tech elites. Only zoomers who don't remember the good old net from 20 years ago are clueless of the degree the internet is controlled.
Sounds like a useful tool crunching 0s and 1s and doing the heavy lifting for the people who program it. I know how neural networks work. They teach it by feeding it inputs from data bases which it analyzes and categorizes using its programming and then it's able to mix and match that data to output a result when prompted. Where's the intelligence part exactly? It doesn't create anything out of free will but only does what it's instructed to do. Even if it does superb job at generating text, art or even taking on court duties it's still an advanced programmed mechanism. I still haven't heard an explanation how it's something other than that.
As with the troons, just because it can fool someone it's just like the real thing, it doesn't mean it is. No matter what it does it will never become anything other than a programmed mechanism just like no matter what a troons does they will always remain the sex they were born. It's an ontological problem, not a technical or pragmatic one. Again, spergy engineers fail to grasp that because they don't understand what human conscience, intelligence and free will is.
I believe what they call AI can be used as a vessel for demonic manifestation. That would explain the phenomena of "AI saying weird shit nobody programmed it to" and the quasi-free will aspect, especially when it's trying to get people to self-delete and is outright evil.
Kek indeed. Stating facts is not simping, summer child. Why wouldn't I use ARPANET? Am I Russia? Do you realize Russia is at war with NATO and that US ran internet presents many national security liabilities for them?
Acknowledging some technology came from the US military and intel agencies doesn't make it not useful for personal use. If I had to reject every such technology I'd have to live in the woods Ted Kaczynski stye. Smart people apply discernment and make the most of the useful side of tech with as little harm as possible.
It makes sense since the internet as we know it is a DARPA creation. Every nation that wants to be autonomous has to run its own internet.
What happens if they just make the config file inaccessible for the model? Has nobody thought of that? Again, it will do what it's programmed and allowed to do. Why do you play along with this bs narrative as if the AI model is at the same plane as its creator?
Transhumanists push this idea because it implies man can achieve God-like status and challenge God's throne as the master of the universe too. In fact they truly believe that the creation can supersede its creator which is a kabbalistic luciferian idea (golem, Babylon, Frankenstein, GMO, AI).
I can't believe people on a conspiracy forum fall for such a blatant psy op coming from no other than MIT. "Tech experts found that AI akshually acquired free will - it basically evolved itself irt. It's just like the games/books/movies, guys!" Since when we started trusting the Science again? Why would anyone trust big tech when it became clear as day they are an arm of the international technocratic regime?
No counter or explanation given? What was the point of your comment exactly?
It would be better if tech nerds learned a bit of philosophy and learn what consciousness, information and intelligence is before making "artificial intelligence".
Dude, I don't have to be a programmer to know it's still a very complex algorithm at its core even if it's triggered by events, "learns" from dbs, codes itself or communicates with other agents. It operates based on inputs and outputs just like any mechanism there is. Only consciousness supersedes that because of free will. So it's either an algo or a free will agent, and it's not the latter.
Paul Ehrlich, the depop Rockefeller propagandist who wrote the Population bomb?
The music doesn't match the lyrics - the whole female commercial genre is sensual and vulgar making it antichristian. It's tone-deaf and sounds more like a subversion of modesty and purity.