It's going to go at least double before it peaks, just like the 80's went double after the 30's. The incoming financial crisis will dwarf anything we have ever seen in history.
It may fall a bit but 80-100k is the bottom.
We'll see. I am pretty confident BTC is going to last a long time and I'm not selling until it gets to a million (in today's money).
Always has been. It's a project of Rockefeller, the Club of Rome and Maurice Strong. They literally wrote they were going with that scam in one of their books.
It's not that gold and assets got more valuable, it's that fiat was devalued by inflation.
BTC is going up too. Congrats on everyone who was smart enough to stack gold and BTC - you are probably set for life or at least in a secure financial position. The rest will eat the bugs and get hooked on the social credit UBI. Of course there is still time to choose where you'd want to be in the near future.
Comparing BTC (market cap of over 2.5 trils) to shitcoins like Luna (40 bils before crash) is ridiculous and you will realize you were wrong to doubt BTC in the future, but I'm not in the mood to debate and we've been over this. I'm in the mood to celebrate!
How is unity at all cost any good? I don't want to be united to demonic transhumanist goblins who sacrifice their babies to Moloch, the freemasonic talmudic NWO or those who are totally depraved in heart and soul. Division, like borders and distinctions is not a bad thing inherently.
34 “Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword. 35 For I have come to ‘set[a] a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law’; 36 and ‘a man’s enemies will be those of his own household.’
- Matthew 10:34-36
So bring it on. Divide even more. Be even more specific in what the Truth is and love it more than your life. I want to be united in God, who is the way the truth and the life.
Any rational man, not brainwashed by jewish propaganda, would agree with what the tiny moustache man said here. Nothing he says here is radical in any sense. He sounds like a patriotic centrist if anything. He calls out the hypocrisy of the liberal democratic powers. Germany was dealt a huge blow of retribution after WWI by the merciless savages of the Entante but it was a child's play compared to what the Anglo-American zionist establishment did to the german people after WWII. This is truly the most cucked nation - even Japan was spared compared to Germany.
Makes total sense. Maybe that's why jews spit on the ground when somebody mentions His name?
Cool. Meanwhile Nick's cult leader (Pope Leo) pushes skittles unions, immigration and the malthusian climate agenda. But sure, jews are the problem. "Based".
After admitting the Pope is wicked you imply a need for a Pope. There is none found in scripture. Jesus said "call no man father", it couldn't be more clear.
No, I didn't. I imply the need of a decentralized synodal Church - the way the Church of the first thousand years was ran, which is the tradition of the Eastern Orthodox Church.
Jesus said "call no man father", it couldn't be more clear.
No, there's no such passage in Scripture. Mathew 23:9 says "call no man your father". But Peter refers to Mark as his son and as does Paul to Timothy. It's such a bizarre literalist argument - what, you think calling your biological dad father is going against Jesus' command? Furthermore, it denies the patriarchal order made by God here on Earth, which mirrors the monarchical patriarchy within the Trinity (Father - Son - Spirit). A man is the father of his family. A priest is a father of his parish. Patriarchs or bishops are fathers of the Church. A monarch/king is a father to the nation - all the way going to Christ and His Father. This is how the world was conceived of by people for thousands of years of Christianity (going back to the OT).
He also said "call no man your teacher" - so what's up with that? This is a word-concept fallacy - the title "father" is not the same as the relationship. The point Jesus makes is that our loyalty lies to our Father in heaven and not in something found in this world.
Here's a short video on the orthodox perspective on this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5K8m2BADWrI
I can't think of a single Bible believing church looking to Luther for any tradition. They all look to scripture.
There's literally an Evangelical Lutheran Church. But my point was that Luther set the precedent of every person being their own authority in interpretation of Scripture. This is why there's not a single Protestant Church but thousands of denominations. And each one contradicts the other in some way. It's pluralism.
By that logic I need a "Papa" (or Pope) to even read what you wrote. How am I to interpret anything you said unless a Pope first tells me in his own words? Absurd when you think about it.
Day to day communication is not the same as interpretation of an ancient sacred text, that is part of a living tradition which keeps and passes down the correct teachings and correct interpretation. Texts don't interpret themselves. I, as an Orthodox Christian believe the correct interpretation is within the Church, given to us by the Church Fathers and not by a single person.
Of course you can misinterpret what I wrote - and you obviously do because you hold Protestant presuppositions, and everything I say about Christianity is interpreted through that lens. This is fine, people constantly misinterpret each other. The problem is when you have a very specific dogmatic teaching where correct interpretation is crucial for that tradition. Even one small mistake can lead to the degradation of the faith and falling away from the Church. Every heresy and false teaching is the result of incorrect interpretation (even if they continue as big traditions of their own like the Non-Chalcedonians, Roman Catholicism, Protestantism, Judaism and Islam).
BIBLICAL CHRISTIAN one, not some arbitrary single
There's no such thing as a Biblical Christian Church. The Bible canon was decided by late 4th century by the Church. Acts describe how the apostles created a structured Church with presbyters and deacons, confirmed by laying of hands and liturgical service modeled after the Hebrew tradition. Epistles give insight into how the Early Church operated.
No such a thing as common denominator abstract Church. The Church exists physically and historically just like the Christ did (hence it's the Body of Christ).
There were many muslim attacks abroad, but the Crusades only happened in a limited region. Such a small area. If it was anti-muslim measures, why was their area of influence so small? Were they weak?
Not interested in debating this. The crusades covered a lot of ground and took Jerusalem which was their main goal.
What did the Bereans do?
You're taking this out of context. Preaching the gospel to the jews was done so that they can understand that Jesus is Christ, the Messiah that their prophets wrote about and that they've been waiting. But it was Paul, who was an apostle of the Church, who instructed them in the teachings and made known to them the correct interpretation of the Scripture (meaning the Old Testament here) where Christ's coming was prophesized. I hope you're aware there wasn't a written Bible at that time.
So does baby baptism work or no? Is the Rapture pre, mid, or post trib? This is a broad claim to tackle.
Yes, the Church has always practiced infant baptism and it's in the Bible. There's no rapture - this is part of the millenarist heresy condemned at the Second Ecumenical Council in 381. It was promoted by jesuits and later popularized by John Darby in the 19th century along with other zionist teaching.
As in universal. Not RC.
Correct. Once again, I'm not Roman Catholic.
Meaning? As in, the Apostles of the Bible? Or do you think there can be new ones made today?
Meaning the apostles of the Bible upon whom Christ sent the Holy Spirit at Pentecost. They are the foundation of the Church. Just like there were no more prophets after John The Baptist, likewise there were no more apostles after the last one of them died. This is why Islam, Mormonism and all the cults claiming new revelation are false.
I never said RC wasn't corrupt - sure it was, but Reformation was used as a tool by the jews.
But the reasons the Western Church was bad has nothing to do with the usual enlightenment jewish propaganda hurled at them like crusades, burning witches and inquisition. Most of those were based actually. It's even more ridiculous when protestants cry about RCC being cruel, when protestant sects were wantonly killing each other for centuries and engaging in much of the same behavior.
What's bad about the crusades exactly? That Christians got together to wage war against the invading muslims? If anything, I give props to the Catholics back then because they at last weren't cucked and defended their faith and people, unlike today.
They are teaching you rhetoric to make you serve the Pope and his empire.
This is exactly the false dialectic of western Christianity. Both RC and Protestantism are false, that's the point. In fact, the Pope became the first protestant when he assumed supremacy over the Church (effectively replacing Christ as the head and becoming a cult leader) and started making changes to the teachings and doctrines (like the filioque or much of thomistic scholasticism which the Protestants inherited). Thus RCC became a centralized geopolitical power with standing armies and banks and was rightfully criticized by Luther. But Luther instead of setting things straight went on and created his own tradition, becoming his own Pope and set the precedent of everyone being their own Pope - having interpretative authority just by reading the Bible. But Christianity is one and not many. The Nicean creed affirms only one holy, catholic and apostolic Church which is the Body of Christ and which is guided by the Spirit until the end of times.
Yes, but in the end Luther was their pawn to topple the RC Church and institute talmudic communism worldwide. It was the Reformation that brought jews back from exile in the Christian states (starting with Oliver Cromwell's revolution in Britain). And look at the fruits of Protestantism now - the Anglicans have just ordained the first woman Archbishop of Canterbury. Most protestant parishes are pro-skittles and antichristian. It's a fucking joke.
The Early Church (today's Orthodox) has been calling the jews out since 33AD. Luther, like all protestants, was late to the party and served as a useful wrecking ball goy for the old Christian world.
This is what happens when you control the world finances.
That’s not fighting. Words have definitions. You don’t just get to say whatever the fuck you want and expect anyone to magically believe it’s real. Running away is not fighting. Explicitly never fighting is not fighting.
Ok, fedboy.
Lol, I see you're an evangelical nutcase. No wonder you're so blackpilled and probably waiting for the rapture (an accelerationist doctrine made up by jesuits and zionists and not part of the early Church teaching). What is even heresy in your worldview? If you're convinced we're going to be killed in a few years no matter what, why do you even care to do anything? How do you fight Satan and the coming of the beast system exactly? I gave a pragmatic plan how one can fight the system by disconnecting from it and living a meaningful life in God. All you have said is pure nihilism and doom & gloom bs - you're playing right into their demoralization psy op: "well, WEF/UN/Gates/Drumpf/Musk said Agenda 2030 is going to bring the transhumanist technocracy in so that's a wrap, boys -we're all powerless before our new technocratic overlords". No, God will take care of His people and even if we have to become martyrs, I'd still prefer that over the beast system.
You’ll burn in hell.
Maybe let God decide that, or you think you know better?
What? I thought he was an atheist? Makes perfect sense he became open with his antichristianity.
When? In 2030? Sure this may come but it could be many years from now. At one point in the future our choice will be to either submit to the antichrist or be killed but we may never live to see this. Either way I'm not worried because I know Christ has already won and all I have to do is live my life in Him. The blackpills don't work on me.
What kind of a sick degenerate exposes a toddler to this demonic shit?
I believe the path to getting things right in society and the world is to get things right within yourself and your immediate surrounding. Yes, I also think society has gone off the deep end and there's no saving the normies, they will get sucked by the AI grid system and live in the technocratic nightmare that's being set up. But we can still build communities and do our best to be decent human beings. If they start prosecuting us then so be it.
Yes, I'm well aware and I've red their whitepapers and books. The reset was planned for 2020 back in the Rio Climate Summit in the 90's but they run behind schedule. This is why it became Agenda 2030 - we'll see if they will manage to pull it off. Whenever that happens I'll be as far from the big cities as possible.
What will you do with them? Nothing.
Get in the best physical shape and be in great health. Get my finances in order so that I don't have to be a slave in the NWO. Learn more skills and be less dependent on the system. Have a few children, God willing. Move out of the big city.
It sure is something.
Why 4? Maybe it's 3? Or 14?
Sure, the smart grid system is coming. But guess what - you will be able to opt out of it and not be a consoomer slave. There will be communities of people living outside the Blackrock AI magecities. Maybe you'll believe it from the horse's mouth?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSvb_ZTYS6A
Pay attention to the 3:00 mark.
Most of the Christian sects you talk about are liberal, pro-skittles, pro-choice, pro-feminism, pro-globalism, zionist etc. But the most important part is that they are false man-made traditions dating back at least 15c. after Christ. So again, why would I want to unite with those goblins? Just because they call themselves Christian?
It's so much more than that. This is a ridiculous oversimplification. There has always bee only one true apostolic Church that has stood the test of time and remained unchanged since the time Christ established it - the Eastern Orthodox Church.