Martin Luther was right. They are still like this.
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (15)
sorted by:
Yes, but in the end Luther was their pawn to topple the RC Church and institute talmudic communism worldwide. It was the Reformation that brought jews back from exile in the Christian states (starting with Oliver Cromwell's revolution in Britain). And look at the fruits of Protestantism now - the Anglicans have just ordained the first woman Archbishop of Canterbury. Most protestant parishes are pro-skittles and antichristian. It's a fucking joke.
The Early Church (today's Orthodox) has been calling the jews out since 33AD. Luther, like all protestants, was late to the party and served as a useful wrecking ball goy for the old Christian world.
The Roman Catholic Church who led inquisitions so corrupt and cruel they would make the devil blush?
Then you want to look 500 years later to blame Luther's stand against evil for today's falling away? They are teaching you rhetoric to make you serve the Pope and his empire.
I never said RC wasn't corrupt - sure it was, but Reformation was used as a tool by the jews.
But the reasons the Western Church was bad has nothing to do with the usual enlightenment jewish propaganda hurled at them like crusades, burning witches and inquisition. Most of those were based actually. It's even more ridiculous when protestants cry about RCC being cruel, when protestant sects were wantonly killing each other for centuries and engaging in much of the same behavior.
What's bad about the crusades exactly? That Christians got together to wage war against the invading muslims? If anything, I give props to the Catholics back then because they at last weren't cucked and defended their faith and people, unlike today.
This is exactly the false dialectic of western Christianity. Both RC and Protestantism are false, that's the point. In fact, the Pope became the first protestant when he assumed supremacy over the Church (effectively replacing Christ as the head and becoming a cult leader) and started making changes to the teachings and doctrines (like the filioque or much of thomistic scholasticism which the Protestants inherited). Thus RCC became a centralized geopolitical power with standing armies and banks and was rightfully criticized by Luther. But Luther instead of setting things straight went on and created his own tradition, becoming his own Pope and set the precedent of everyone being their own Pope - having interpretative authority just by reading the Bible. But Christianity is one and not many. The Nicean creed affirms only one holy, catholic and apostolic Church which is the Body of Christ and which is guided by the Spirit until the end of times.
There were many muslim attacks abroad, but the Crusades only happened in a limited region. Such a small area. If it was anti-muslim measures, why was their area of influence so small? Were they weak?
What did the Bereans do?
So does baby baptism work or no? Is the Rapture pre, mid, or post trib? This is a broad claim to tackle.
As in universal. Not RC.
Meaning? As in, the Apostles of the Bible? Or do you think there can be new ones made today?
Not interested in debating this. The crusades covered a lot of ground and took Jerusalem which was their main goal.
You're taking this out of context. Preaching the gospel to the jews was done so that they can understand that Jesus is Christ, the Messiah that their prophets wrote about and that they've been waiting. But it was Paul, who was an apostle of the Church, who instructed them in the teachings and made known to them the correct interpretation of the Scripture (meaning the Old Testament here) where Christ's coming was prophesized. I hope you're aware there wasn't a written Bible at that time.
Yes, the Church has always practiced infant baptism and it's in the Bible. There's no rapture - this is part of the millenarist heresy condemned at the Second Ecumenical Council in 381. It was promoted by jesuits and later popularized by John Darby in the 19th century along with other zionist teaching.
Correct. Once again, I'm not Roman Catholic.
Meaning the apostles of the Bible upon whom Christ sent the Holy Spirit at Pentecost. They are the foundation of the Church. Just like there were no more prophets after John The Baptist, likewise there were no more apostles after the last one of them died. This is why Islam, Mormonism and all the cults claiming new revelation are false.