That's a fresh read of the geopolitical situation. Appreciate that. Putin's best bet is that considering all his shortcomings like his KGB past, his technocratic rule and ties to the globalist elite, he still looks much better compared to the absolutely insane level of degeneracy, corruption and pure evil displayed by the Western establishment.
The dead sea scrolls genius... They are definitive scientific proof of a jewish kingdom existing there thousands of years ago.
What does that prove? That jews were there at the time those were written. It doesn't prove any Biblical right they have over that land as it being given to them by God. But I consent that it can be objectively established that a jewish kingdom existed thousands of years ago.
Earlier you said conquest is no longer valid "after world war 2".... Like how dumb do you have to be to swallow that propaganda?!
I never said I believe this bs because apparently I'm aware this principle has been contradicted multiple times since the end of WWII. What I said is it's hypocritical for the zionist powers to shower us with such propaganda while making conquests like the establishment of Israel. These are their definitions and their reading of history, not mine. Are you seriously that stupid not to see I'm doing internal critique of their narrative in our little argument? I don't believe morals change or evolve - right has always been right and vice versa.
Next it's stupid because world war 2 was the ultimate affirmation of right of conquest, not the abolishment of it.
The zionist powers paradigm is what you'll find in the history textbooks and it goes like what I said before - "SHTF during WWII and we need to create a new world order that will prevent this from ever happening again. That's why we'll establish the UN and other transnational institutions that will keep the peace and civility in this new world". All the normies believe this. This is what they've been taught about XXc history - "the bad militarist guys were defeated and we lived happily ever after in our free market globo-homo liberal democratic brave new world".
Then clearly it wouldn't be right for Palestinians to take it over by force in the future, right?
They are still there though. It's right for them to defend their home. But if the kikes slaughter them all and 2000 years later Palestinians come back and go "you know, we were here before and you conquered us so we want the land back" they can fuck off because making claims on a land you inhabited 2000 years ago, along with many other peoples before and after you, is retarded.
Ok, I'll try stooping to your level for a second here, slowboy.
The Bible isn't just a historic document - it's divine revelation, a religious text. Tell me how an atheist, a person who doesn't believe in divine revelation, could determine which parts of the Bible are true and which are make belief? Same goes for all mythological narratives. For hundreds of years people thought the Trojan war is entirely fictional.
I don't believe might makes right because I'm Christian. Was it right for muslims to conquer half of the world at one time? I don't think so but they did and no one had a say back then. Is it right for the zionists to take over Palestine like they did? I don't think so but they did and people call them out. Again, It's generally agreed that the middle ages was a different time where conquest was seen as perfectly normal. That's not the case in post WWII world where the whole war was sold as morally justified defense of the peaceful democratic West (in league with the socialists) against evil Hitler's conquest of the world. Then shortly after the war they proceeded to conquer Palestine to make a home for the poor victimized jews. The same double standard is evident in the treatment of Russia's invasion in Ukraine and Israel's genocide of Palestinians. This is hypocrisy.
I mostly agree with your take. But there's one major problem - Putin's Russia was balls deep in the plandemic hoax. This is what convinced me Putin can't truly be in opposition to the international jewish cabal. This was his time to shine and make it absolutely clear he's on the right side. I like some of his policies but I have to take everything he does with a grain of salt. Same for DJT after Warp Speed and the stabbies.
There are cultural differences between the East and the West indeed, but globalization, the common market and digitalization make everyone part of a single mono-culture. A secularized Russian using TikTok and eating McDonalds while listening to Taylor Swift is hardly different than their American counterpart. You underestimate the power of cultural indoctrination. I see the current situation as a great chance to reject liberal degeneracy, consoomerism, globalism, materialism and progressivism and rebuild true russian orthodox identity with culture based on traditional Christian values.
It's highly possible Putin was propped up as a necessary evil enemy to help usher in the NWO in a poor rehash of the Cold war bs. Remember when terrorism was used in a similar manner? Isn't it funny how all crises and wars lead us down the path of more surveillance, centralization, globalization, inflation, taxation and loss of freedom? It always works out exactly how they wanted.
Atheists claim the Bible narrative is a hoax so it can't be used as proof.
Because there's such a thing as DNA, and you can compare the DNA of modern jews to the DNA of ancient human remains.
You can and you'll find they're not the same people. They may have similar genes but the tribes don't exist anymore and the covenant God made with Israel (Abraham and the jewish people) was with those tribes. That's why the new covenant was between God and the people within the Church (the new Israel, Christ's Kingdom) and not with the jews.
Lastly, your comment is the biggest display of hypocrisy you could possibly do. Because all of this evidence you are demanding of jews to show a historical claim, you did not demand of Palestinians.
You're seriously stupid. There's no hypocrisy in my position - you conflate your views with mine. I never said the land belongs to whoever was there first. I don't care about historical claims because everyone could make such claims. My problem with the state of Israel is that there were people living there when it was astroturfed and it was done in a hypocritical way after WWII when the powers that won instigated yet another conflict that was unnecessary in a time when the world has moved past colonialism and conquest. They did it because they had to serve their zionist masters.
Shows how much you know.... They can and they do call themselves the real Greeks. They think modern Greeks are nothing more than Turkish mutts.
Little do you know that I'm from the region and know the balkan history much better than you. Macedonians make endless idiotic claims and no one outside of that small country believes them or takes them seriously.
They have a stake. Elders are not necessarily nihilist and know the world will go on without them and they want to leave a legacy (they have families and children too). Those who believe in God know everything they do here will have consequences in the life after.
You still use smartphones?
Yes, Peter was pro-western too.
Wouldn't you consider the barbaric killing of the royal family and the subsequent installation of a jewish ran (85% of the party) degenerate atheistic state by Lenin a fall of the monarchy? The USSR was financed by western jewish bankers and exploited for its resources and for geopolitical reasons (muh Cold War fearmongering). When its usefulness ran its course they destroyed the regime, pillaged what was left and started westernizing it through their financial and cultural institutions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductionism See anything familiar?
How do you determine who the "original inhabitants" are? What about the people who may have lived there prior to the jews? What objective historical account would prove that? How do you know today's jews are the descendants of the jewish tribes from the Torah? Should modern day Macedonians make claims to Greece because they believe they're the descendants of Alexander the Great?
Reductionist drivel. Address the argument, don't regurgitate semantics to me. I know the meaning of words I'm using but more importantly I'm aware of the context too which your autistic deconstruction fails to account for.
The Vatican started by killing every single pagan and gnostic in Europe.
Even if I grant you that, why would that be wrong in your worldview? Didn't the pagans wantonly kill Christians and jews in Roman times? How can you claim "Vatican bad" when you don't have a standard for good? Show me one non-Christian state in history, where people of convictions opposite to the status quo weren't prosecuted. Because it seems to me your beef is not with religion at all but with human nature which always seeks to eradicate ideologies perceived as threatening the one in power. Since you're an atheist why do you consider it wrong that the more powerful oppresses the less powerful? Isn't that what nature is about?
Says the resident Soros shill.
71 is not geriatric plus he appears to be in sound physical and mental state. I'd rather have experienced people as leaders than the young global degenerate clowns that are in vouge in the West.
Ekatherine westernized Russia. She had revolutionary enlightenment ideology influenced by the Illuminati and the French Revolution degenerates. It was such western-oriented monarchs that led to the downfall of the Russian Empire.
I can't because jews were planted by the Anglo-American zionist establishment after the war. They used antisemitism in Europe during WWII as a pretext for providing them a with state of their own. What the powers should have done instead is give them unoccupied land in Siberia or South America and let them do their thing. Giving away already occupied land where people live peacefully is a dick move. Why not give the jews parts of the UK to make their Israel? It's easy to be charitable signing away other people's property.
Who planted the muslims there? Last time I checked they conquered the region by themselves fair and square.
They shouldn't have been planted there for starters you idiot. Now the situation is a clusterfuck. What, you expect Palestinians to peacefully let the kikes take over their land and treat them like animals? You're basically saying might makes right and if that's the case any debate is pointless because the only thing that matters is who's more powerful.
That's a non sequitur. What he meant is the perception of truth by people passing through stages, not truth itself which is absolute and unchanging.
Based and truthpilled.
We need truth. Truth is life. God is Truth.
I didn't hear your take on Russia/Ukraine. If you claim invasions and wars are justified today you should have zero problems with Russia making their move. The line isn't arbitrary - I pointed a very specific time when international law became a thing and that's not just my take but the consensus in history. Namely after WWII with the Nuremberg trials and the UN treaty.
but yet you want the Israelis to pay for the "crimes" of their ancestors but you don't want to make the Palestinians pay for the exact same crimes.
That's a strawman. I don't want them to pay for any crimes and I don't consider historic conquest a crime - I'm just stating the facts. Jews aren't entitled to a piece of land or their own state - they've lost it and were astroturfed in Palestine by the Anglo-American zionist elite just because they were there 2000 years ago. I don't think that's justified.
Can you give me an example of a comprehensive atheist worldview or ideological system shared in an atheistic society that you wouldn't consider religion? Aren't liberal democracy, libertarianism, progressivism, industrialism or the postulates of "free market" capitalism a religion too? They have their dogma, their saints, their feasts, their sacraments. It sounds to me you use a very wide brush describing what religion constitutes. Communism and similar "scientific forms of government" (yes, it was called that) may employ certain aspects of Christianity and Judaism and treat the leader as a prophet/messiah/demigod, but they are still based on materialism and on things of this world - the metaphysical aspect of christology, salvation, eschatology, theosis is completely absent there. It's a very low effort imitation and inversion of what Christians believe.
I rebuke everyone who professes a form of Christianity outside the Church's doctrines and who perverts the faith (including evangelists and the Vatican). Have you noticed both communists and jews hate Christians? Not so much any other religion - they don't tolerate Christ in particular. Maybe it has something to do with the fact communism is a jewish psy op to begin with (85% of the communist party under Lenin was jewish).
Perhaps deliberately, the entire society is based on superstitions over common sense and revolves around a supreme deity (communists are not atheists, they have a deity and it is the leader), which causes billions upon billions of deaths because people are forced to follow it or die
And atheists don't hold superstitions and unjustified beliefs based on faith? Liberal humanists, naturalists and empiricists don't presuppose things they can't prove via the scientific method? David Hume deboonked those myths 250 years ago with the problem of induction. Then Willard Quine finished the positivists with his Two dogmas of empiricism. It's all faith and dogma based regardless of it being an organized religion or scientism (the cult of science and nature). There are no such things as brute facts or self-evident/common sense or pragmatic truths. Everything in existence and everything one appeals to should be accounted for and justified under their worldview (with the preconditions for it's existence being met for it to be possible).
We witnessed people dying en masse for believing or being forced to follow the coof Science. How do you people still continue with the same demented arguments against "muh religion" as if the enlightenment scientism based worldview isn't full of shit and doesn't lead to death, degeneracy and enslavement. You hate the Truth, which is God, this is how. You won't repent and submit but there is always hope as long as one is breathing.
No the Jews literally took over the Roman empire and went around inverting European civilization until it becomes one with Jewish civilization. It is not a bias, it is literally in the history book. Also there's no such thing as "heretical" when the Gnostics and the independent Evangelists are pretty much the "good guys" and are considered heretics by big religion.
There's no bias in the gnostic history books you read at all, I'm sure. What makes the gnostics the good guys?
Amen. Not everyone though.
It started out good but near then end it went schizo mode with the bs about Christianity and the Nicaean creed. God is king.