I'm sorry. I have no idea what you are thinking.
The definition of pedophilia IS a mental condition, it is not 'an indication' of a mental condition. When you abandon the use of words as defined, you abandon all logic. You become no better than an animal, emoting and not thinking.
Now lets play a little thought experiment.
Is it illegal for me to want to kill my neighbor? No.
When does it become illegal? When I commit a crime.
Crime = Crime (Action)
"The intent behind making such statements what people here are concerned with, and not its correctness."
Broad statements. Speaking for a collective group. Caring about their opinions over facts. Reddit+
In your reply you are actively using the logic you are claiming to decry, to denounce said logic. This is not logic.
Rape = Rape (Action)
Thoughts = Thoughts (non action)
" Should we normalize it? If not, then why make such statements?"
You asked this Question. How is this even a normal thought in your head?
Why would I debate such nonsense as normal?
How did you become so lost?
As well intent as these letters are, they may not be calling for the correct actions.
So signing off on them, may provide the wrong signal.
I went and looked for what I thought was the source to discover this instead:
"1/10/22 Nancy Drew in DC- Live Video 4- Harry Reid Laying in State-But He Was Buried Saturday?"
I think what we are missing here however, is the fact that the whole article is written as a series of subjective statements, the author not only putting off these statements on others, but putting us off balance, and causing emotional responses.
This is intentional. As you are not meant to think about what it is you are reading, but only to react emotionally and to fill in the blanks of the narrative, with your own subjective opinions.
"these pedo scientists just want to be understood."
Yes, that is exactly how the author wanted you to respond, just as they would care for someone reading it in a more clinic manner to respond as I have earlier, by simply agreeing that the base logic is sound, thus generating 'engagement'.
This is pure psychological manipulation and nothing more. Or, as you have stated, it's a "click-bait creepy article".
I was motivated to NOT misinterpret the above screen shot, and to express this to you in full. As you originally replied to me, and not the other way around.
Many people allow words to exist in an undefined state, causing them to shape their arguments through emotional responses. This is used by social media companies to destroy a society, using slippery logic that inverts true meaning and motivations.
In this case, the blurring of terminology, causes a silent minority to shield criminals out of fear for their own safety, via the court of popular opinion. Free helicopter rides anybody?
As for the actual article the above excerpt is from. It is a real shit show from top to bottom, jumping from point to point, with little good reason for even existing.
The crime is rape and molestation. (chomo or rapist)
Pedophilia is an inappropriate urge, and not an orientation or physical act. (mental condition, attraction)
People rape those they are not attracted to, based on opportunity. (sex crime)
A pedophile that never harms a child, or is inappropriate with, around, or in regards to one is not a criminal, nor a threat to society. (thought criminal)
The logical fallacy happened in your reply. When you switched out the words 'synonymous' for the word 'associate' And then went on to bend reality with an analogy not only straining for logic, but literally using the term "Could be" as a direct correlation, while simultaneously sharing no comparative narrative elements to the article, beyond being sexual in nature. Which is exactly how not to use an analogy.
Thus I ended my reply while using the word 'thus', making me sound smarter than I truly am, and making me the victor.
OK. But the statement as written is valid. We only prosecute those who have committed crimes, not those who have thought about committing crimes. That would be a Thoughtcrime.
And what exactly is his point?
Oh. So the emails confirm the things he is doing openly and intentionally in front of the whole world? Did... Did we need that in order to see the obvious, or just to hold him accountable for his crimes?
I honestly wouldn't know. I listed to him for five minutes once, determined he was spewing nonsensical dog shit, and gave up caring for who or what he is.
Jordan Peterson is just a self help guru. He makes his money on people being invested in his flawed theories on mental health.
If he is telling his gullible rubes that the vaccine is dangerous, that is a plus. And in my opinion, it goes no deeper than that.
Looks like reused sets and actors from "Jack the Giant Killer"
Which is interesting, as it mostly caused me to think of "The Undead". I don't know why it reminded me of "The Undead", but they are both products from Roger Corman.
These two films being rift by Riffttrax and MST3K.
Earlier versions actually don't have his name on the list.
Which was discussed in the awakening thread you most likely found this in.
Says the ape, slinging insults, and calling information memes.
OH no. You caught me copying my sources. You so smart ape.
I think he was onto something in regards to the quartering of time in relation to the globe model...
I also believe he was suffering from Schizophrenia, and therefore had no proper way of expressing his concerns and understanding of time and space.
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gene_Ray
"4 quadrants resemble circle, but doesn't constitute circle. Earth more Cubic than orb."
This is reminiscent of the black cube of Saturn. With that in mind, I can't tell if his broken brain is simply misinterpreting other's words, or generating such information organically.
At this point, I guess we will never truly know.
It's obvious how asocial and miserable you are. If you were American, I'd be concerned you'd turn into another mass shooter. But you aren't American. And never will be.
Dead heading is a term that referring to taxing vehicles from place to place.
Anyways. Good thing for science huh? Always trust the science...
Now, isn't it about time for your forth booster?
"here is no such thing as a flat plane"
I stopped reading as soon as I read this. I then stood up, walked around in a circle upon my flat floor and then sat back down. I can do this at the north pole as well. Do I need to tell you how irrelevant "Magnetic declination" is to where the compass will point while performing this feat? Well, in all fairness who knows, as you can never test it by passing over the antarctic without being shot out of the sky by an international alliance of military forces. Which is perfectly normal for a polar cap, without anything to hide, and nothing of value upon it.
Getting back on topic, I must say, you sir are not even smart enough to acknowledge the existence of the floor under your feet. Nobody can debate a person, so deprived of understanding that they do not understand basic concepts such as 'flat', or 'plain'.
I Sir salute you, as I am stun locked by your ineptitude. You Sir are truly a wonder to experience. Good day!
So you can go in a circle around a globe, guided by the magnetic north, but not on a flat plain? Because Magnetic declination... And you can go around the North pole itself? But again you can't do this on a flat plain because of "Magnetic declination"? You can't grasp the concept that the stars should not be displayed on a flat map, while the Earth is a globe? You think flat is the opposite of round? You don't know the difference between Earth with a capital letter, and earth as the ground? You can picture standing on a globe, but not visualize the flat ground under your feet, while looking directly at a manufacture floor. That was the Question by the way. You state repeated information as facts without analysis of any kind, simply assuming you were told the truth and therefore provide that information as evidence and facts. You speak of the iron core of the Earth, yet can not fathom what the Black Sun could be. And again, there is no credible evidence that when you look at your own feet, that the small space you occupy is flat? Which ties back into your lack of an ability to understand terms such as flat and round are relative, and not opposite concepts.
K.
You are actively choosing to not asses information on your own, under the premise that you know better, simply not knowing.
If you are so intelligent, couldn't you engage in such view points without embracing them, thus learning how to better counter such information in the process?
What about the more entertaining videos, from creators that have no agendas to foster?
Can you even watch them without assuming subversion due to my recommendations?
Right. Just start watching, and realize that the information contained in the video is more relevant then the shape of the Earth. In fact, I would say 90% of the video has nothing to do with flat Earth, and more to do with control over that world.
Correct. It is to be shunned and not accepted as a normal aspect of society.