Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

65
You knew it was coming (media.conspiracies.win)
posted 3 years ago by WEEEEEWUZZZZKANGS 3 years ago by WEEEEEWUZZZZKANGS +66 / -1
28 comments download share
28 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
▲ 4 ▼
– Questionable 4 points 3 years ago +5 / -1

The crime is rape and molestation. (chomo or rapist)

Pedophilia is an inappropriate urge, and not an orientation or physical act. (mental condition, attraction)

People rape those they are not attracted to, based on opportunity. (sex crime)

A pedophile that never harms a child, or is inappropriate with, around, or in regards to one is not a criminal, nor a threat to society. (thought criminal)

The logical fallacy happened in your reply. When you switched out the words 'synonymous' for the word 'associate' And then went on to bend reality with an analogy not only straining for logic, but literally using the term "Could be" as a direct correlation, while simultaneously sharing no comparative narrative elements to the article, beyond being sexual in nature. Which is exactly how not to use an analogy.

Thus I ended my reply while using the word 'thus', making me sound smarter than I truly am, and making me the victor.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– KiloRomeo 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

You missed the point of my reply entirely. The original post implies there’s no connection. You’re clearly motivated to misinterpret me so there’s no point to discussing with you further.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Questionable 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I was motivated to NOT misinterpret the above screen shot, and to express this to you in full. As you originally replied to me, and not the other way around.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - lf7fw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy