Get one after the executive order. Because fuck him.
Or possibly the verdict was correct, as my title implies. Evidence is now on record implicating the FBI in sedition and treason.
Durham's next case takes place Virginia.
Uninfected Matched controls
Which is not the same as un-vaccinated control group. They aren't even looking into to it are they?
That's all fun, but if he's drilling, he either knows why he's drilling, or has been given enough clearance to understand that he is not to ask Questions on the matter.
You don't head an operation like that, and not understand your roll in the matter.
Go fuck yourself.
Complacency can go hand and hand with corruption. Or have you already forgotten the past 3 years? OH, sorry, it seems you ONLY remember the past 3 years, and have drawn conclusions from that.
Enough word games.
MUh laW anD ORdeR...
Go fuck yourself.
Yes. Why won't I post things related to the thoughts that only exist inside your head?
Here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMae4XZnxTw
I hope that helped!
Fighting corruption with further corruption is how we ended up where we are today.
No. Everything you have said here is wrong.
You are arguing in support of the corruption of juries. That is not a straw man. You are an idiot.
You neither got the entomology correct, nor your logical order, as that the word's root meaning does not "bring us to" the clausal Question in the title.
And this:
Consent to suggested statistics about increase of sickness sounds like a probable cause...
Jesus fucking Christ. That's word salad, with a side of psilocybin dressing.
-1. Ends do not justify their means.
0̽̎. Words hold no meaning to you, just as you do not understand that ends do not justify their means. Your lack of understanding of governance, legal proceedings, causes your ideology to come into Question. You seem to lack a moral bases, or logical process for understanding or developing one.
Ź̸̗̚. I will not argue your vague theoretical points, as this thread already has a true factual topic, may I remind you. Nor will I agree with your assumptions that jurors should wield power, such as how they did so in this actual case, that you are refusing the acknowledge while making up your fictional scenarios that ignore long term ramifications.
Given that many of my posts have been relevant and informative...wake the fuck up.
"I'm saying God bless the piece of shit juror who provided another opportunity to bring jury nullification back into the mainstream conversation."
That's not what you said. That is what you must have been thinking when you wrote this:
"I'm happy to see this. Jury nullification is an excellent tool for fighting legal fuckery. "I don't think this person should be thrown in a cage for this" is a perfectly legal reason to find someone not guilty."
I'm glad I could clear that up for you.
"And your brain has less wrinkles than a bed on Parris Island."
Right. And if I unpack that analogy my reward is what? ̴̤͋̊ ̸͖̆͠¡̷̗̚͝
This is an excellent tool, and more people should be aware of it. Jurors can't be punished for their vote, and the jury instructions that they must rule according to the law are a bluff.
NO. You are simply encouraging jurors to lie, which can be used for any means. Your notion of moral grounding is a fallacy, and can only be used to undermine law and order.
Parents arrested for speaking at a school board? Not guilty. Your neighbor got rolled up for his oil filter suppressor? Not guilty. Refusal to wear a mask on a plane? Not guilty. Breaking quarantine? Not guilty.
None of that was the topic at hand, and I'm not going to play 'what if' on the topics of mandates, and illegal arrests orders. Those are bad faith arguments, and you are promoting the notion of people acting in bad faith, as a means to an end.
This is a blessing and an excellent opportunity to educate those around you about how to fight a corrupt system.
So true. In fact, I'm educating you currently. Now go to drunk. You're bed.
But nuclear reactors, and melt downs are?
Look, I tried reading that, but... He's just not saying anything. 4 pages into "Hiroshima" he's talking about AK47s? What the fuck.
Question. Why would it matter to Japan if the ordinance was a large conventional payload, as apposed to a nuclear weapon? Why would it matter to anyone for that matter?
Are you aware that a b-29 bomber couldn't even carry a modern MOAB short range?
Bombing campaigns were relentless, Why would 2 incidents of the same be any different simply by lying about the nature of the ordinance? Who benefits from that?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_raids_on_Japan
I can give you reasons to lie about the nature of the earth, and our universe, how viruses work, or what constitutes a monetary system. But lying about a warhead changes nothing.
Jury nullification (US/UK), jury equity[1][2] (UK), or a perverse verdict (UK)[3][4] describes a not guilty verdict of a criminal trial's jury despite a defendant having clearly broken the law.
You're incompetent corrupt scum.
Weird. I don't believe that was what the judge asked of her. Doesn't matter though I suppose, as the evidence has been entered into the court records for future cases.
I'm going to need for you to try harder.
Lawsuits, lawsuits for miles and miles.
Supplements and foods? Oral health and bacteria? Vaccines or diseases? The fact that you are male? Could be a wide range of things. I just know that I don't see anything 'swimming' through the liquid, and that the individual globs of coagulation propel themselves through deformation while losing mass.
Looks like a chemical reaction, as I don't see any actual parasites.
Shortly after the incident, the automaker agreed to cover 50 percent of the repair costs since the car was out of its warranty period, but under one condition: that the owner keep quiet and not invoke any legal proceedings against the company, and not hold Tesla responsible for "any and all claims or damages arising out of or in any way connected with any claims or incidents leading or related to our provision of Goodwill [partially paying for the repairs]," according to a document obtained by Daily Kanban.
So a single person, and they are claiming that it's a Non Disclosure Agreement, when clearly he talked about it?
Was I to only read the title and give it up votes based on that alone? Further more, do you know the difference between Elon Musk and the corporation known as Tesla and it's lawyers? Because they are different entities. Oh, sorry. It would seem that, again, I am not going along with the narrative you baked into your title.
My bad.
According to the mod logs, you were un-banned, and then shortly after, perma-banned. Or to put it another way. You were given just enough rope to hang yourself with.
Sad.
2BEF0BE81BF5F5AC108B39E184C386AA4F35FA07
My title is incorrect, as it is not 18 US Code § 2331 §§ 802 that directly relates to coercion. Please see fit to read the attached article that details it's relation to 21 Code of Federal Regulations § 50.23 and 24 – Exception from General Requirements.