Look, I tried reading that, but... He's just not saying anything. 4 pages into "Hiroshima" he's talking about AK47s? What the fuck.
Question. Why would it matter to Japan if the ordinance was a large conventional payload, as apposed to a nuclear weapon? Why would it matter to anyone for that matter?
Are you aware that a b-29 bomber couldn't even carry a modern MOAB short range?
Bombing campaigns were relentless, Why would 2 incidents of the same be any different simply by lying about the nature of the ordinance? Who benefits from that?
I can give you reasons to lie about the nature of the earth, and our universe, how viruses work, or what constitutes a monetary system. But lying about a warhead changes nothing.
But nuclear reactors, and melt downs are?
Look, I tried reading that, but... He's just not saying anything. 4 pages into "Hiroshima" he's talking about AK47s? What the fuck.
Question. Why would it matter to Japan if the ordinance was a large conventional payload, as apposed to a nuclear weapon? Why would it matter to anyone for that matter?
Are you aware that a b-29 bomber couldn't even carry a modern MOAB short range?
Bombing campaigns were relentless, Why would 2 incidents of the same be any different simply by lying about the nature of the ordinance? Who benefits from that?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_raids_on_Japan
I can give you reasons to lie about the nature of the earth, and our universe, how viruses work, or what constitutes a monetary system. But lying about a warhead changes nothing.