on closer inspection, it is likely you are just the nub
It's making use of 2 channels, 1 with a username of 666 and another with a username of watc. When you remove h from the url, it can't parse the query string (the part after the ?) anymore, as it's a query string for the watch url. So instead, it tries to open the profile with the name watc. YouTube channel settings allows you to set a redirect URL for a specific channel, so what this user has done is have the channel of watc redirect to the video uploaded by user 666."
Gonazlo
....no one over the age of 12 or with an IQ over 90 seriously believes that the Russians are going to invade anytime soon...
Lira, lol
Russia disables the entire Ukrainian military.
this is some high quality intel as usual
Oh, did you finally get the joke?
what do you think the F in Faggot stands for?
nvm...but I am curious, can u tell me?
Never said i could. Or that i would disagree with you. I am just making fun of you. Mind to answer my initial question? I mean this should be really easy for you, but you can’t, can you?
ok, i will give you a hint:
HIV vrus
isolated HIV virus
what do think does the V stands for?
maybe from the word "Jewish"? Just a wild guess.
and now its all around the globe and accounts for 73% of cases
maybe read the headline again?
first line starts with 3x '-'
after that one url per line
'#' will mark the line as comment and will be ignored
*edit: this is the minimal/basic syntax, if that doesn't work you have to ask some admin how the file is parsed
no, not really
hey, retard, nice wall of text and great evidence you collected. Now we can say for sure, the real conspiracy is: you suck at selecting the proper filter option. None of the addons just listed are developer tools.But yea, big censoring going here,lol
Yeah, an extension that's over 10 yrs old is now "added" heh. You google bastards
added like "added to your browser"
it seems we a little layer 8 problem going on here
a) nobody really visits small websites anymore.
people still do, you might not be aware of it. Maybe its because you only stick to the mainstream sites. And if more people would visit those sites, they wouldn't be small sites anymore...
b) ... is a bit of a nightmare and really hard to test.
and here I call total bullshit, its esier than it has ever been to that shit. (first example that came to mind)
Also: anybody could code a website, because it was just mostly raw html. Sites were essentially fancy word documents, which is how they should be.
you can't do that anymore?
When I search "COVID" I need more than 12 pages of results
learn to do some proper research (hint: the results are limited per query)
I didn't link that pic
my bad, nvm then
Why go through the bogus exercise of showing millions or billions at all?
pretty sure its partly for marketing reasons (seems they can impress at least some folks with it). I am fairly confident they have that many results, as well as i am faily confident that most of those resulsts are useless garbage and not worth the query. It seems some people confusing search engines with some sort of "universal index" of the internet.
they never tell you the truth.
they literally tell you on the pic you linked "google does not server more than..."
This is big
No, it's really not.
Guys, did you all know about this?
Yes, and you can easily find articles about this from 10 years ago.
...google result manipulation...
apperently you dont realize that google (and most other SE) a) never claimed to provide you all resuls (if you have a minimal technical understanding - for obvious reasons) and b) its pretty much their core functionality to sort, filter rank etc. pp. (aka manipulate) the results
huh?