I wish there was a place I could point you towards where it was all synthesized into a coherent picture, but it was original research and I've never gotten around to writing it up in a single place. And I've not yet come across anyone else who has put any of these big pieces together. But aside from the main pieces already mentioned, I'll throw in two more researchers (with caveats) plus an Easter egg.
First would be Zechariah Sitchin. Interestingly, I've never read more than a paragraph of his work. When I began, I knew that his main conclusion was that these "ancient astronauts" called the Anunnaki had visited Earth. As I dove into it bit by bit, I came to realize I was coming independently to all the same conclusions he did. Hard to believe that's chance or error, right? So then, as far as I know, by reading his work you can get the basic picture of the Anunnaki much faster and much better than when I took the long way.
The caveat is this: you'll see every shill and his brother blackwashing Sitchin every time his name comes up. Once you realize that the Anunnaki are a big part of the overall truth, you'll understand why They don't want people studying them.
Worse is that all of the prominent Anunnaki researchers--and I could name a dozen--sooner or later devolve into nonsense and bullshit. Most of them are sooner, and this is why they're allowed to talk about the Anunnaki at all. It's its own form of disinformation.
The other researcher is Mauro Biglino. His main line of research is meticulously correcting the bogus translations of the Old Testament so that we can see it was actually written about certain human interactions with the Anunnaki. It's quite stunning how many issues and mysteries that clears up.
Because of the very sensitive religious nature of it, he was always cagey about declaring exactly who the "Elohim" were, but in a couple of his presentations he briefly mentions Sitchin and the Anunnaki. But far worse, a couple of years ago he was apparently "turned". In his interview by Graham Hancock, you'll see he is forced to say that the "Elohim" were only human kings. It's sad and painful to watch.
So here's the Easter egg: My crazy-sounding claim is that Satan was one of the Anunnaki and that he took over the Earth (for some period of time) starting at what we now call 600 BC. Well, somebody somewhere knows that too, or at least knows something about it.
You may have heard of the Lucis Trust (formerly the Lucifer Trust) who are the publishers for the UN. All very sus just from that alone, right? Here's what it says on their page about...
He it is Who has presided over the destinies of life since about 600 B.C. and He it is Who has come out among men before, and Who is again looked for.
You cannot find a single place on their site where they explain how they come up with that date. But I know and now you do too.
Thanks for your interest, and never hesitate if you have any questions!
This is how they make sure certain participants stay in their lane. Remember when Stephen Paddock suddenly had a brother that suddenly had a kiddie porn beef? They just happened to catch up with him less than a month after the Vegas "event":
Vegas Gunman Stephen Paddock's Brother Arrested in Child Porn Probe (NBC News 10/25/2017)
Of course--just as would happen with any of the rest of us--the felony charges magically evaporated after the Vegas "shooting" was safely in the realm of "well-documented violent historical event" which may not be questioned:
Child porn charges dismissed against Vegas shooter’s brother (AP News 7/5/2018)
Fun blast from the ridiculous past: Take a look at the top photo included with the NBC story. It's appalling how blatant the bullshit is. The armed cops have taken cover behind their vehicle, vigilant against the lethal threat. Two bros cower with them in safety. Meanwhile, two other bros--both behind and in front of the cop car--are on their smartphones like they're waiting for the bus.
Tristan's thesis sounds like lunacy until you actually see his presentation of the evidence. I can take it a step further and cement it with some even larger issues.
Tristan refers to this very consistent 1800 year gap, which he places between (what we are now calling) 500 BC and 1300 AD. The first question we should ask is, "Why 1800 years?" That question might then devolve into, "Is there something special about the years 500 BC and 1300 AD?" The answer is yes, there is.
First, to put a finer point on it, these are not particular years that we can single out, at least for now, but approximate special times. Second, it would be better to talk about the 1800 year gap between 600 BC and 1200 AD. What is special about those times?
Fomenko himself tells us about the more recent one. In his book, "Tsar of the Slavs", he makes the case that the Jesus was the historical figure Andronikos I Komnenos.
One item I would add to his case--because I don't think Fomenko is quite this conspiratorial--is that Andronikos is said to have been tortured for three days and finally died on the 12th of September, 1185 AD. That's according to wiki, but you'll find other sources saying he died on 9/11. The real Jesus was put to death on 9/11? A disturbing coincidence, if you think this was just a coincidence.
The beginning of the 1800 year- gap coincides with something known as the Axial Age. They don't put it this way, but the human race suddenly "woke up". There is far, far more evidence and related events than is mentioned in the wiki writeup.
So what went on in 600 BC that fundamentally changed history and the human race itself? That's a much longer story--like book-length--but it has to do with the Anunnaki, the real identity of Satan, and the nature of human consciousness. But then I did say it cemented some larger issues.
The blast itself is gargantuan, and you can spend as much time as you like trying to find a conventional explosion remotely like the size and intensity. If you look closely in the last half, you can see something that looks like scintillation (direct interaction of high-energy decay particles with the sensor), but the cell phone video is so shitty it's hard to tell.
Then aside from any examination of the blast, if you look at this post from today on LOP...
... you'll find every "Guest" and his brother with all different reasons why it isn't. Even if you weren't used to looking at such explosions, that would be enough confirmation right there.
There's been no mention of it on r/conspiracy_commons or r/conspiracy. No government will make a statement on it either, since they've all been trying to deescalate the situation. Then there's the perpetrator and their enabler, so you won't get word from either of them.
No one showed people in a movie that this is how it would play out, so essentially they are incapable of reaching these conclusions.
Everyone gets to make up whatever Reality they please, even the dumbfucks and shills. They all do anyway, in an effort to comfort and preserve their fragile egos.
I sympathize, in a way, but it's still dismaying and pathetic.
For some historical perspective, Edith Wilson ran the government for a year and a half after the President, her husband Woodrow, stroked out. It falls in the category of "open conspiracy", where the mainstream admits that it happened, but never talks about it as if it was no big deal. Really, probably very few have ever even heard of this.
Fast-forward a century and we don't bother with open conspiracies. It's just open.
PS: If you read the wiki, you'll find the justification to be:
In My Memoir, published in 1939, Edith Wilson justified her self-proclaimed role of presidential "steward", arguing that her actions on behalf of Woodrow Wilson's presidency were sanctioned by Wilson's doctors; that they told her to do so for her husband's mental health.
"Yes, excuse me, I have a doctor's note here that reads... let me get the wording right... hmm, poor handwriting... oh, yes, 'Fuck your Constitution.'"
This is the limited hangout story.
It comes out instantaneously from outlets as diverse as the NYT and on Reddit from "a special ops guy I know who looked at the shrapnel wounds". They'd rather have us believe this than trying to figure out what really happened.
But it sounds plausible so why would we not believe it as stated? All kinds of other shit was blowing up after the pagers: walkie-talkies, solar panels, household appliances, etc. You can see a tweet in this post followed by comments from every shill on the planet.
Are we supposed to believe that Mossad planted explosives and triggering mechanisms in all these products just on the off chance they might need to blow them up? I don't put it past them technologically or morally, but it's wildly inefficient with a very high chance of exposure and (as we're seeing) tremendous international blowback as an act of state terrorism.
Then what did happen? I'm just spitballing here, but I would start thinking along the lines of a directed energy weapon based on Tesla's ideas about harmonic oscillation. As an aside, there's an old "MythBusters" (Episode 60: Earthquake Machine) where they try physical oscillation on a bridge. Judge for yourself, but I have never seen them look more freaked out. Then they declared it "busted" and never mentioned it again.
So the Hebraic geniuses think up (a way to steal) a technique for a DEW to induce a harmonic oscillation in small electronics. Each type of device would have a characteristic frequency, which is why they went off one type at a time. It's possible some devices share close frequencies, so dishwashers also blow up when walkie-talkies are targeted. When hit with the DEW, the device loads up with energy but you just need enough to disrupt the lithium-ion battery, which contains a tremendous amount of energy.
Would they accept the limited hangout that Mossad tampered with Chinese/Hungarian pagers in order to keep this tech under wraps and away from everyone's consciousness? Absolutely! First, they admitted to nothing and will never be held liable in any forum for this. Second, nobody has pagers, Chinese or Hungarian or otherwise. It's no threat and will quickly fade from memory. Anyway, only a bunch of terrorists got blown up.
Whenever I tell people to believe whatever they want, that's rarely good enough for them. I came to realize they're not attempting to communicate with other people, but simply talking to themselves. I find this a clear mark of a certain type of human consciousness.
And when I point this point they never "get it", which is another clear mark.
You can compare the blast to the "wunder waffe" ATACMS missile that Russia has repeatedly warned about (ff to about 3:40 for the impact):
ATACMS: The Himars Missile Upgrade Ukraine Desperately Wants | WSJ Equipped
If anyone cares to argue that detonation is remotely similar to what went off in Toropets, there's no helping them (you may know who I'm talking about). Nor is the ammunition itself exploding, since munitions fires cook them off one by one.
In fact, the blast (and/or other non-conventional effects) is so powerful that it sets off other areas of the depot, where you can see the serial detonations of munitions in the typical fashion of burning ammo.
It wasn't micro, either. I'd eyeball it to be at least 10kT. It's beyond ignorant for anyone to think the Russian leadership doesn't see what I see--and far more--and they've clamped a lid down tight before it all gets beyond anyone's control.
Interesting to see someone with the viewpoint that Russians are incapable of lying. Does not seem that sophisticated a worldview. Can't imagine any informative analysis comes out of it, but I'm certain some people never wonder if they might be missing something.
I would add that I feel that MbS feared that this time would come, and has been preparing Saudi for this conflict for several years.
Early in the Trump Administration, he pushed through deal after deal for armaments, the biggest worth $110B. This was way, way beyond the use of KC-135's to drop bombs on Yemeni tribesmen.
The standing question was: what did they need all that gear for? Supposedly, the Saudi royals were all in with the Zionists and the antagonism was phony. People could also wave their hands around about the MIC and sales, but Trump was the only one since Ike ever to call out the MIC.
So this is it: a real fight against the Zionists for all the marbles. They have come completely off whatever chain may have existed before. The clock is ticking because Trump will pull the plug on any US involvement come January. (IDK, of course, but I think this time around mutineers will be shot. Er, I mean, suffer tragic training accidents like so many others.)
I suspect this does not track with how you'd chart the situation, but I thought I'd throw it out there.
A bit of additional info and analysis is available in the first couple of minutes of each of these videos:
Huge Russian Missile Depot Destroyed💥Another Ukrainian Offensive Failed⚔️Military Summary 2024.09.18 (YT Military Summary 9/18/2024)
Harvest Time🔥 Huge Ammo Depot Destroyed🎖Heavy Losses in Kursk💥Hrodivka Has Fallen🎖 MS For 2024.09.18 (YT Military Summary 9/18/2024)
Quick note on the significance of the insignificant:
I got a fund-raising email yesterday from Team Harris-Walz, one of about eight per day even though I am not registered as a Democrat nor have ever signed up for anything faintly Democratic. The subject line?
Sep 18, 2024 is today.
Somebody somewhere thought that was a good headline, attention-grabbing, hard-hitting.
My point is that the Left has always prided itself on attracting the creative types, but it's clear now that they are so odious and objectionable that they have driven out all the creatives (along with blacks and Latinos and women and Asians and gays).
If Mossad was attempting to convince the Arab world that the Zionists were a clear and present danger to everyone in the region, and that immediate action was required while differences among them could be sorted out later, then in the immortal banner of George W. Bush: "Mission Accomplished!"
Calm down, I just said I thought the story was fake. But don't worry because exploding pagers are good evidence for it. You've convinced me and everyone else who might be tempted to express views at variance with your own.
You're free to believe whatever you please, but I have found that that particular freedom is actually too much for the vast majority to handle. They'd rather tell everyone else how correct and outraged they are. I find it dismaying to see displayed, personally, but there you have it.
An article on it from Iranian media:
Hezbollah members and civilians killed, wounded in Lebanon pager explosions (PressTV 9/17/2024)
You know, the true nature of Jesus is something I've never really tried to get to the bottom of. Two things: the evidence is somewhat murky, and so many people have their ideas about Jesus set in stone. When there's clear evidence regarding other related topics such as we have been discussing that people have such a hard time processing, there didn't seem much sense trying to pin down who Jesus was.
But with the question being raised, if we think in terms of attempting to explain evidence, off the top of my head there are several areas related to him that are seldom discussed and would point towards who he really was:
The dates is his birth and death, as discussed in "Tsar of the Slavs" would cement the idea that he was a real person. Anyone adhering to the idea that he was a fictional character would have to think all that evidence was mere coincidence.
There's the strange fact that demons possessing people in the New Testament recognized him. Again, this speaks against the text being some made up nonsense. Who would make that up? Longer story, but demons seem to be the discarnate spirits of Nephilim, and Nephilim in turn seem to be the offspring of Anunnaki and human women. So we get tied back in to the idea that Jesus was connected in some fashion to the Anunnaki.
There the famous passage where Jesus says he is "not of this world". Well, someone who is in some way alien would say that, wouldn't he? More to the point is this: when Jesus says he is from "above", he uses the Greek word "ano". This is nearly identical with the Sumerian word "anu". This was a synonym for "heaven" but came originally from An or Anu, who was the king of the Sumerian gods. We're tied in again very closely to the Anunnaki (<- see the use of "Anu" again, since that term means "those who from the heavens came to Earth"?)
We also find events such as the Transfiguration of Jesus. If someone thinks Jesus was just a man, or Jesus was God, or Jesus did not exist, then this is simply baffling. If you start with the idea that Jesus had some relation to this race of powerful aliens, then maybe there's a way we can make sense of this incident (although I as yet do not know what that is).
So as far as mainstream views of any stripe, I guess you would say that I do not hold that he was man, or god, or fictional. Interestingly, if you hold with the view that "They" sometimes reveal their knowledge in popular media, you may be interested in this video:
Deleted Engineer Dialogue FULLY TRANSLATED from the Script of Prometheus
It is revealed that the powerful aliens took a human, educated him to be a "savior" or teacher of some type, and sent him back to the human race. The humans punished and killed this educator. Well... sound familiar?
Recall that in the New Testament, Jesus disappeared for 18 years, between the ages of 12 and 30, before he began his ministry. If someone was going to make up the New Testament for any reason imaginable, why would they leave this out? Maybe it's because there was a real Jesus and he was.., not around.
Intriguing stuff, isn't it? However high my opinion of myself is, I tell you I could not possibly begin to make all this up.