It's just perspective, but it's more like, "The Harris-Walz campaign cares about the needs of hobbits, America's most neglected minority."
I take it as a sign anyone with a shred of talent, enough to not use a crappy photo, has been driven away from the campaign by these abusive freaks.
Reddit is horrible, to be sure. When he died, I couldn't post a short, pure-text post about Colin Powell and his key role in the coverup of the My Lai Massacre. That's mainstream, Wikipedia-level history, and that was three years ago.
More annoying than that--and I believe this to be absolutely purposeful--is that it has been absolutely flooded with annoying shills. It's sort of the inverse of the homeless situation: you're one of the few normal people trying to live in a town populated by loud, smelly, ignorant, aggressive, mentally-unstable people.
The bad drives out the good. The plan is simplicity itself.
One of the most iconic montages in cinema history: Louis Armstrong - What a Wonderful World (Good Morning, Vietnam's Soundtrack)
I hope everyone puts this in the proper overall perspective: a pedo human trafficker thought federal prosecutors were too dirty to deal with--even to help himself and screw a guy who didn't like him--and an accused quadruple murderer puts himself at risk because thinks people need to know the story about how gross these feds really are.
And I think to myself, "What a wonderful world."
A psychological trick used by tech companies back in the day was the "one-time charge". They'd save up their losses then write them off all at once against a single bad earnings report, which would soon fade from memory. Then it was right back to, "Look how great everything's going!"
The technique became so refined that they would do it in advance and sell it as good news. They'd set up a grand new initiative with huge funding and much fanfare. Over the course of time, they'd shuffle losses off to that venture, which would eventually go kaput. Then in paragraph 14 of a story in the weekend financial pages, they'd say, "Can't win 'em all, but we'll keep trying!"
Worked every time.
I feel that this is vital intel for those who like to game out potential Big Igloo scenarios. And keep in mind that this is the reaction with relatively mild political protesters are who are upset about things happening thousands of miles away to people they've never met.
I wonder if they're going to magically discover that he was posting a TikTok:
"Sup folks. Just wanted to let y'all know that I'm acting alone and certainly not in concert with the Secret Service, FBI, or any other intelligence agency. I'm thinking about posting another TikTok where I name specific individuals that definitely have no knowledge of my actions or any association with me whatsoever."
take the sides or the party line being pushed onto us
That hits on something that has become so clear to me lately as a fundamental mechanism of control.
Almost all of us define ourselves as a collection of attributes: Democrat, firefighter, consumer, American, Red Sox fan, Person of Color, whatever. We wear these "identifications" like little merit badges on a sash that we use to signal others. And there's no doubt we think of these as "merit" badges, because no one "shamefully confesses" they're really a minarchist.
"They" know this and the mechanism of control is attaching tiny little strings to these badges to pull us around. That is, They simply declare that as a "good" fill-in-the-blank, you "should" do-thus-and-so. If you don't or you disagree, you're bad and should ashamed of yourself. They magically bridge the is-ought distinction and no one ever seems to see any of this happening.
Every once in a while we see someone removing one of these merit badges and freeing themselves. The one we see frequently now is when a black person declares they're a Trump supporter. They're accused of being a race traitor, of course, but without that merit badge and that tiny string, that person's attitude becomes, "I couldn't give a fuck what you think."
Maybe, but I know that for me it's become very much the opposite.
I mean, I recently stumbled onto this guy William H. Parker, who made the LAPD the military occupation force it is today. I just knew he had to be connected to the Parker family of generational Satanists scattered all throughout American history. I spent like an hour and a half finding that connection, and felt an acute compulsion the entire time not to stop until I did. I haven't got around to writing it up because I knew very well all along that only about six people will read it and care. I had to find out for myself.
OTOH, on the rare occasion I try to spend a little time researching an investment, after about 5 minutes I'll be like, "Good God, release me from this torture! How can this be worse than high school?"
It's hard to believe that anyone could get involved in conspiracy theory to any extent and then give it up, but there you have it.
My only theory is that fear finally takes over: they get exposed to so much material that generates fear and which their subconscious judges to be potentially true that, in order to relieve that anxiety, they find a reason to quit.
We all battle against that same phenomenon. Pretty much nothing in the study of conspiracy reveals good news. It is only the love of truth in a higher consciousness that can overcome it.
It's a pain to transcribe to this format, but here's a link to a post that includes a long comment where I wrote up the hilarious fable told to us about the original Apollo moonsuits:
New Artemis lunar space suits will cost 1 Billion and take 15 years to design and make. Apollo suits were made by Playtex the bra manufacturer (r/conspiracy 1/20/2023)
That brings up the untold story underlying the untold story, and a part of what first drew my attention to the issue....
Maybe a decade or more ago, after the "Axis of Evil" thing came out, I watched an interview with a documentarian who had made a film about it called, "The Principle". He somehow got all the big mainstream astrophysics names: Laurence Krauss, Michio Kaku, Max Tegmark, Lisa Randall, etc.
But the thing was, the new findings violated the Copernican Principle: that there were no special places in the Universe. Thus the title. It all finally dawned on these geniuses and they tried to back out, but they had signed all the paperwork.
To top it off, this guy was a Christian and took it as confirmation of, you know, whatever. So lawsuits flew and all the rest and the film virtually vanished. Last time I looked, you could still scrape up some remnants of it's existence, but it wasn't easy.
There's an interesting and untold story underlying the "Axis of Evil". In very brief:
It looks like Science(tm) wanted to back up their Big Bang fable by studying the Cosmic Microwave Background. They sent up first the COBE then the WMAP satellites.
These were some rigged and bullshit experiments and--sure enough!--they proved the Big Bang and the age of the Universe, etc. But the rigging seems to have unintentionally induced a bias that shows itself as this Axis of Evil. Ooops!
So they had a real dilemma. On the one hand, they could get rid of the Axis of Evil by saying that their experiments were fucked up, but then their confirmation of the Big Bang goes out the window with it. On the other, they can stand pat and just let everyone forget about the whole Axis of Evil business.
The public memory being what it is, they're holding on to the Big Bang and gambling on the forgetting.
God knows what Stephen knows, but I suspect it could be a lot through his brother.
My conclusion as to the shooting of Halyna Hutchins by Alec was that it was a blood sacrifice to allow him entry to the next level, namely politics. That's why there's so much nonsense and contradiction and so little punishment surrounding the incident.
As an addendum, I think Alec is actually dead now. That's why almost all the talk of him entering politics had died away. They're just continuing to drag out the psychodrama of the shooting as another ring in the circus of distraction.
A couple of notable items just from the photo alone:
-
It looks like we're supposed to think Putin is behind this, but the big colorful sign conveys the opposite. If you didn't know what this was about, you'd think, "That nasty-looking man is promoting faggotry in Bulgaria and these people are against it." I feel more and more that the social engineers of the world, in their confusion and desperation, have actually lost the thread of what they're trying to accomplish.
-
So we're clear where this is all coming from, the article was published by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, which is the spawn of the CIA:
Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty: The CIA Years and Beyond (Woodrow Wilson Center Press with Stanford University Press, 2010)
It's enlightening to think through the simple fact of the existence of this announcement. You can leave out whether COVID exists, or was he really vaccinated, or is he actually already dead and this is just CGI. The fact is that "They" wish us to believe this is true.
The gambit, I would guess, is to encourage more people to get vaxxed, along the lines of, "Even the vaxxed and boosted are still in danger and you better get moar." The psychological risk, of course, is that people may easily think, "Jeez, that fucking thing clearly doesn't work for shit and I'm done with it." That seems a huge risk.
Maybe what is being revealed here is that "They" know the target audience really does not "think" these things through at all, and that there is no risk.
I remember when the Kyle Rittenhouse trial was going on, some woman tweeted something like, "I've been following this case for a year, ever since it happened, and I just found out today that the people he shot were all white."
I think even without social media algos or AI or whatever else you might point to, people have been living in very different "realities" for quite a long time.
The RFK assassination was faked. You can tell by an examination of the photos. Well, the photos that remain in existence, that is, because they've been trying to annihilate them.
Digging this out of the thread of stirred up mud clouding the waters, we find:
Suspicious, right? Then you can add what we find in this article:
New Twist in Kennedy Mystery : Photo Negatives of Robert F. Kennedy’s Assassination Disappear (LA Times 1/18/1996)
Okay then, Skip! But I still suggest that everyone take a close look at the photos for themselves, and while doing so simply asking yourself the question, "Are these real?" A gallery of the Bill Eppridge photos are here. You'll note how incredible shitty the "forensic value" is in the first place. Great job, Bill.
I have a writeup somewhere on the flaws if anyone needs the hints. It's best, though, that anyone interested do it for themselves because otherwise it's all too easy to accept or reject the evidence of your own eyes when someone else has told you what you're seeing.
PS: Does Bobby Jr know about this? Hard to believe he doesn't, but it's possible and there is no evidence either way. There are significant negative implications in either case, though.