2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

I came at this from a completely different direction from Mullins, but I reached the same conclusion. He says in the very first sentence that "all conspiracies are Satanic", but I would rephrase this to say, "there is only one conspiracy, and it is literally Satanic".

I got the first part of that from Batman, in some modern day cartoon: there were not multiple conspiracies, but all were aspects of a single conspiracy. By this time I had learned that the Elite signal their truths in popular entertainments. After living with it for some time, I failed to find a single conspiracy that I believed to be independent from all others.

And after discovering that Satan existed quite literally, I figured, "Well, who the Hell else would be in charge of the ultimate conspiracy?" Many, many things became much simpler and clearer after that epiphany.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

IIRC (and I'm too lazy too look it up), Roger Waters originally came out in support of Ukraine and against "Russian aggression".After hearing him be so on point about Palestine and Israeli crimes, I was so disappointed. I even thought he might just have been a plant all along.

Looks like he got hip to the real situation in Ukraine and got back on track. I think it goes to show you should never bite down too hard too quick because deception is everywhere and none of us are immune, although I think we can see that the vast majority live their lives as if they were.

3
Primate98 3 points ago +3 / -0

How many people do you think read this? I'm just guessing, but I'd say zero.

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

I copied this text some time ago from the Psychosis page:

Psychosis is an abnormal condition of the mind that results in difficulties determining what is real and what is not real. Symptoms may include delusions and hallucinations. Other symptoms may include incoherent speech and behavior that is inappropriate for the situation.

Any of this sound familiar to anyone?

3
Primate98 3 points ago +3 / -0

I've seen so many shills hammering away over at r/conspiracy with "get out of the left/right paradigm!" But that sounds like what we should be doing and those are not really shills, correct?

Yeah, there are some dumb conspiracy noobs that picked it up like it was the cool thing to say, but mostly no, they're definitely shills. Their point is to get you away from any shreds of good sense left in the Republican establishment. The GOP seldom advocates the lunacy of the Left, they just go along with it when the time comes.

The larger fallacy is that Leftism is no longer some political ideology with which you might have some disagreement, resolvable through dialog and compromise. Rather, it has become the nexus of collection and indoctrination for those driven to a form of insanity by the brainwashing.

And that's the more important point because this crew will go along with any initiative, no matter ridiculous, and as er have all recently witnessed. In fact, they revel in the outrageousness of it all.

So imagine walking into your local loony bin and saying, "C'mon guys, snap out of it! Time to get your shit together. Let's just work this out, mmmkay?" I recommend people stop thinking that's going to lead to any kind of progress.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Elohim of the Bible and other works are one and the same as Sitchin's Anunnaki. Yahweh of the Bible is the Anunnaki known as Enlil. Most surprisingly and most key, Nimrod and Satan of the Bible are the same entity, and also the same as the Anunnaki known as Marduk.

The information is essential to any understanding of these works and thus of historical events.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just came across this very bad sign for Ukraine relative to the Western powers. The banner carrier for the Leftist Establishment Narrative, NPR, has been given the green light to mention less-than-complimentary things about Ukraine:

NPR Turns Against Ukraine!

Do not ask for whom the bell tolls, Elensky & Co., it tolls for thee.

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

Some years ago I picked up a factoid in mainstream reporting. The subject was the number of people who died from the flu every year. We all got used to hearing figures in the tens of thousands, maybe 40 or 50 or even 75,000. So they asked, "Of those, how many were documented by laboratory testing to have died of the flu?"

They said the answer was about 25. Not thousand. Twenty-five. If some old person felt poorly, went to the hospital and croaked, well, flu, amirite? Just check that box and we all move on.

Everything is just a much deeper and longer-running scam than any of us ever suspected.

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even what is referred to as Ukraine's war effort I think has got to end soon, weeks or a couple of months at a guess, and I base that on just two data points.

First, the professional army has been annihilated. None of the reinforcements going to the contact line are professional contract soldiers.

Second, in the last wave of mobilization, the casualty rate was 80% before even reaching the front. They were killed, injured, or deserted.

I think this is going to be a case of "slowly, then all at once", but there's no way short of active duty NATO soldiers just up and deploying into Ukraine (in larger numbers than they are already) to extend what has long been a foregone conclusion.

by DrLeaks
2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think the whole ghey op was for this purpose: to frighten people away from talking about all the ghey ops. However, I also think they will never go after real people unless it is under extremely controlled circumstances.

Why would I say this? I keep thinking more and more that the "trial" was not an actual legal proceeding. Note that no one even questions that. In any real proceeding, the defendant has a right to discovery, and the easiest thing to do would be to claim that the child or children were not real people and demand all the records that would exist if they were (birth, school, health, death, etc.). Either none would be provided or there's a very good chance they could be shown to be phony.

Since Jones did none of this, nor even talked about why he didn't, IDK what further proof we need he's controlled op and this was just another sham.

3
Primate98 3 points ago +3 / -0

I agree that this is pretty much the model, but I have found that there is a deeper underlying problem. That is, when you show people the gateway into an inner level, very few of them have any recognition of it, or of the wall, or of why they would want to get past it. I suppose that's because everyone thinks they live in the citadel.

Here's an example: I've posted replies on Reddit conspiracy many dozens of times directly in response to someone's OP linking them to a paper by Miles Mathis. His work is loaded with stunning revelations. Not one single time have I got back a reply saying something like, "Wow, some surprising stuff in there!" or "Hey, this really goes deeper than I thought!" Nor do they say, "That guy is full of beans!" Nope, just no response at all.

As an aside, Mathis is a disinfo agent himself, and the highest-level gatekeeper I have ever encountered. So he has to guide you in himself past several gateways in the image above to bring you to the door he's guarding.

Anyway, I surmise that because the information is so disturbing to their worldview, even though they are presumably "conspiracy theorists", that it just bounces off them like ping-pong balls off a brick wall and they move on undisturbed. It pains me to say it, but they're just a more refined strain of normie.

I bring this all up to point out that even the "awake" are severely limited, and that's the world we're dealing with.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

I believe it's more correct to say that feminism was invented by "Them". Here's one of the originals, good old illumined Adam Weishaupt, on the very subject:

There is no way of influencing men so powerfully as by means of the women.  These should therefore be our chief study; we should insinuate ourselves into their good opinion, give them hints of emancipation from the tyranny of public opinion, and of standing up for themselves; it will be an immense relief to their enslaved minds to be freed from any one bond of restraint, and it will fire them the more, and cause them to work for us with zeal, without knowing that they do so, for they will only be indulging their own desire of personal admiration.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's a long analysis, but I believe he's really dead this time and won't be coming back.

One aspect of it is that I presume Zawahiri had returned to Afghanistan to direct Al Qaeda's destabilization effort against the Taliban. I suppose we can conclude that control of Afghanistan remains a key component of Cabal plans.

I suspect he returned to Afghanistan in the fall of 2021 somewhat visibly yet still out of the reach of the Taliban. Then in November, he dropped off the radar in Ghazni by spreading news of his own death by natural causes, then quietly takes up residence in Kabul.

Although I do not agree with the thesis of the article, you can read some of the details of his supposed demise in: The Biden Regime Did Not Kill Ayman al-Zawahiri. It's pretty fishy just on the surface that a sick and aging physician goes to a country where he's a wanted criminal and drops dead because he can't get treatment.

I should note that the Taliban and Al Qaeda are deadly enemies, although the Establishment wants you to believe that they're all terrorists and therefore all work together. This is utter nonsense.

So elements of the Taliban are working with White Hat elements of the US military, and they locate Zawahiri at his new digs in Kabul and put the zap on him. This explains two other puzzling elements.

One is that the Taliban was very confused at first about what happened, or even if Zawahiri was targeted. Well, it had to stay compartmentalized even within the Taliban because they have got to be worried about infiltration.

The other is the the Biden Administration was clearly catching up to news that was already spreading. Now they're publishing articles trying to backfill how they knew all about it, of course. Pathetic, but everyone buys it so maybe I shouldn't say that.

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

What a joke this all is.

I've actually been wondering if the trial is even real, as in an authentic legal proceeding. I mean, movies are shot in courtrooms all the time and the way we know it isn't real is that we see it in a movie. But what if they just showed it to us with low production values and without an opening theme and credits at the end?

And even if there was something illegal about a fake trial, can your wildest imagination include anyone being prosecuted for it? They told us they went to the Moon too, and no one has got in trouble yet.

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

The more you read, the more you can tell that they're just making it all up. Also, I think it's entirely pointless even trying to talk to anyone that believes any of it. But then again, everyone is also free to slam their head against a wall.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

Does anyone think the US will defend against this accusation by claiming that Russia must be making all this up because viruses don't exist?

Nah, guess they'll just do the usual and act like this accusation doesn't exist.

3
Primate98 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why isn't Fauci telling the gays to mask up their bungholes? I'm not even science and I figured that much out.

5
Primate98 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think the really disturbing thought is that we live in a world where virtually everyone believes viruses exist, are contagious, and cause illness. Further, unless the deep psychological warfare under which they exist ceases, we stand almost no chance of persuading them otherwise. For proof, look what it took for this intelligent, educated, and experienced guy to change his mind.

On another note, I would say there definitely was something new making people ill from about October 2019, before the announcement of COVID. People reported being sicker than they'd ever been with a very bad "flu" or pneumonia. So I would argue that a bioweapon of some sort was disseminated, although there's such a tornado of nonsense surrounding COVID I've never even attempted to figure out the nature, perpetrator, or deployment of the weapon.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

I didn't see his name mentioned in the infographic, but this information on the Kursk originally comes from Dimitri Khalezov, the gray-haired man pictured in the upper left.

I consider his very long and detailed interview on nuclear 9/11 required viewing for any researcher of that topic (one of the pictures is a screencap from that interview). And it's quite little known, but he has also written a long analysis explaining in detail how Chernobyl was not an accident, but sabotage by a tactical nuke placed under the reactor (by the CIA, obvs).

Very unexpectedly, Khalezov is two degrees of separation from a current affair: Brittney Griner. In the proposed prisoner swap with the Russians, the Americans are supposed to trade the arms dealer, Viktor Bout, who happens to be a personal friend of Khalezov. In fact, Khalezov was in Thailand when Bout was picked up on orders of the Americans and tried to get him released without success.

Very small world, sometimes.

3
Primate98 3 points ago +3 / -0

I was surprised to find out that no one in Taiwan cares about this Pelosi matter at all. And I was shocked that a long story on it was published in the mainstream. All the war-mongering was just a media creation and everyone bit on it hard.

Possible Pelosi visit elicits shrugs in Taiwan, long the focal point of geopolitical standoff

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree with your analysis, especially as concerns Shareblue. There are many other examples of such, like the J6 hearings. Is there one single person in the US who had no opinion on the events that day, then tuned in for a few hours and thought, "OMG, it really was worse than Pearl Harbor!" No way. And it turned out even the early rating were half what they were for the regular evening newscasts they preempted. That is, half of normie newswatchers literally turned it off.

I would go the next step and say that this all indicates we're in the endgame. Who pursues an agenda without worrying about losing adherents to it? One that knows control is slipping away and if they don't score a "war decisive" victory soon, they never will.

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did you see the "topless" photos? "She" has an eight pack and a dude's pecs, no breast tissue at all.

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sort of similar to Ellen Page, who I claim was always just a guy. Now he can live as just himself. For all we know, "Elliot" was his name given at birth.

6
Primate98 6 points ago +6 / -0

There is a baffling verse in the Bible suggesting some function for gold in human physiology:

And he took the calf the people had made and burned it in the fire; then he ground it to powder, scattered it on the water and made the Israelites drink it.

Exodus 32:20 NIV

Three entirely enigmatic statements all in a row. Burned gold? It would simply melt, then evaporate. Ground to powder? Gold is notable in that it can be pounded to molecular thinness, so it can't be ground in the conventional sense of cracking it apart. Mixed with water? As a gold panner could tell you, normal flecks of gold would simply sink to the bottom.

No one is said to have gotten ill or died from this, so it doesn't seem to be a punishment. Rather, it seems only a method for destroying their stock of gold to prevent creation of another idol.

We also know that just previous to this, Aaron collected gold jewelry and melted it in a fire to make the calf, so we know it began as gold with which we are all familiar. So what could this verse possibly mean?

The fact that conventional Biblical exegesis is entirely silent on it indicates to me that we are not supposed to think about it. Thus, it's something very important for us to think about.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›