I was going to make a technical point about the title of the book, and while doing a quick search to refresh myself, I came across a glaring anomaly. But first, the technical point.
One of the teachers killed (allegedly) was Lauren Rousseau. IIRC, it was her car in the parking lot which had three bullet holes in it. Only two were pictured. One was right below the window, and where the paint had chipped off in a circle around the hole itself there were several spots of rust. The other hole, in the A-pillar, was--get this--outgoing. Also, in the DNA analysis done by the forensics lab, I believe it was Rousseau's blood that was found on a cartridge inside of one of the still loaded magazines.
Sherlock Holmes might tentatively hypothesize that Rousseau was killed quite some time before the "event", maybe in her car, and by the same person that loaded the magazines. So maybe nobody died at Sandy Hook, but someone may actually have died.
The anomalous fact I came across is that after all this time and all the attention to SH in all the media, there are still five children whose pictures have never been published. Yeah, you heard that right. Here's the article from 8/5/2022:
So if anything about the latest AJ trial was real, he would have pursued the line that neither these five nor any of the other fifteen children were real people. Seriously, the parents of these five, if subpoenaed, were going to claim they had never taken any photos of their child? Or that they had destroyed them all? Is there a jury in the land that would buy that, even one with only Democrat voters?
I'm pretty new to the details surrounding Sandy Hook and haven't digested 5% of them. I'm pretty astounded at all the little anomalies.
The sheer number of things AJ didn't bring up in his own defense tells me this is a show trial for some other purpose, and AJ is co-opted in some way. Consciously co-opted.
Shouldn't be a surprise. Anyone who gets real information to the public gets killed or jailed.
One data point to keep in mind is that the AJ trial was initiated by TPTB themselves. Not many CTists discuss it any more since it's been fairly thoroughly documented by works like "We Need to Talk about Sandy Hook" and the book you posted. If someone can get through those and still think anything about it was real, I hope I never have to interact with that person in any way.
I've finally settled on the thesis that the motivation for the AJ trial is to scare anyone from publishing or speaking on false flag narratives for fear of legal repercussions. There is also a powerful second order effect of the family and friends of such people. Like if you try talking about some FF with your buddy and he says, "Hey man, you need to drop that. Gay frogs is harmless, but don't you know what happened to yelling fat man? People really died! You gotta smarten up!"
I was going to make a technical point about the title of the book, and while doing a quick search to refresh myself, I came across a glaring anomaly. But first, the technical point.
One of the teachers killed (allegedly) was Lauren Rousseau. IIRC, it was her car in the parking lot which had three bullet holes in it. Only two were pictured. One was right below the window, and where the paint had chipped off in a circle around the hole itself there were several spots of rust. The other hole, in the A-pillar, was--get this--outgoing. Also, in the DNA analysis done by the forensics lab, I believe it was Rousseau's blood that was found on a cartridge inside of one of the still loaded magazines.
Sherlock Holmes might tentatively hypothesize that Rousseau was killed quite some time before the "event", maybe in her car, and by the same person that loaded the magazines. So maybe nobody died at Sandy Hook, but someone may actually have died.
The anomalous fact I came across is that after all this time and all the attention to SH in all the media, there are still five children whose pictures have never been published. Yeah, you heard that right. Here's the article from 8/5/2022:
It's been almost a decade since the Sandy Hook shooting. Here are the names and pictures of the 27 victims, including 20 children, who were murdered that day.
So if anything about the latest AJ trial was real, he would have pursued the line that neither these five nor any of the other fifteen children were real people. Seriously, the parents of these five, if subpoenaed, were going to claim they had never taken any photos of their child? Or that they had destroyed them all? Is there a jury in the land that would buy that, even one with only Democrat voters?
I'm pretty new to the details surrounding Sandy Hook and haven't digested 5% of them. I'm pretty astounded at all the little anomalies.
The sheer number of things AJ didn't bring up in his own defense tells me this is a show trial for some other purpose, and AJ is co-opted in some way. Consciously co-opted.
Shouldn't be a surprise. Anyone who gets real information to the public gets killed or jailed.
One data point to keep in mind is that the AJ trial was initiated by TPTB themselves. Not many CTists discuss it any more since it's been fairly thoroughly documented by works like "We Need to Talk about Sandy Hook" and the book you posted. If someone can get through those and still think anything about it was real, I hope I never have to interact with that person in any way.
I've finally settled on the thesis that the motivation for the AJ trial is to scare anyone from publishing or speaking on false flag narratives for fear of legal repercussions. There is also a powerful second order effect of the family and friends of such people. Like if you try talking about some FF with your buddy and he says, "Hey man, you need to drop that. Gay frogs is harmless, but don't you know what happened to yelling fat man? People really died! You gotta smarten up!"