I haven't called him a shill although it's obvious i think so. I said a part of his behaviour is typical of shills in my opinion, which checks out. That's a generic observation upon a behaviour, not a personal attack.
Same as a satanic forum then. Newspeak babble.
Any forum that discusses Christianity can be considered a “Christian forum”
So if a discussion on christianity arises on a satanic forum that would still be called a christian forum?
Amazing insight. Thanks for confirming yourself.
We all see right through you.
In your fantasy, this forum doesn’t discuss Christianity.
Changing gear? typical of shills. I never said it doesn't discuss christianity. You didn't either. You called this a christian forum. Very different argument. It is not, and since you can't find any argument for that, you change your very premise hoping nobody notices.
Insulting person, not argument. How original.
Your argument is troll, that's called trolling, yes. Welcome to first grade.
It is though, lol.
Guess you forgot to add 'in my fantasies', important detail. feel free to quote me anything from the homepage referring to christianity.
in society
trolling, again.
Is this a script?
Thanks for the compliment.
But i must remind you this is not a christian forum by nature. Your comment is completely out of place.
prevent foreigners from integrating into society.
This is literally the point.
I want to hold them back because i want a homogeneous society without them.
I was speaking of how treating foreigners as subhuman holds them back
We literally treat them as subhumans because they don't fit, we don't want them to fit, and we are fully in our right to do so.
You missunderstand the whole point: we don't care how to have them, we care not to have them.
It's you who said 'society', clearly referring to western society. Not 'our society'. Not 'western society'. Just 'society'. If you believe what you just said, how so?
prevent foreigners from integrating into society
What society? doesn't african society counts? why do you only consider western society as society? sounds racist.
Second, i don't need niggers to be happy. Surprise
So what's the problem with letting gorillas vote? if we fund them the right circumstances, in a million year they will be just like us. Oy vey im erry smart.
Those images are like saying there is a bear in the sky because someone draw a bear looking circuit between stars.
Bad take imo.
Those jobs are mostly generic. Europeans can do them by default or learn them fast.
The real problem is that those jobs aren't financially viable anymore for people not on any kind of welfare.
You'd just need to take the billions european countries are spending on immigrants welfare and turn them into european welfare or nationalize those jobs so that you can state-finance them directly.
It's a false problem you are depicting imo.
I may elaborate further later but for now there is a bit i was thinking of recently, it's the 55%/95% split between different routes (StO / StS).
A person caring only for himself can do that for a 95%, while a person caring for other must still care for itself first. Therefore the difference in numbers.
It's actually a wise difference.
I feel there is a lot of truth in the hidden hand stuff spirit-wise, but that he obfuscated some real story details. I don't believe his account of yahweh history.
It's a github, wouldn't worry.
Nope. They are angry they want to take their right to be so for themselves away. Correctly so imo.
Thank your god rule1 doesn't apply to dead people, huh?
Here, in a mostly remoted unknown internet corner, because its the only kind of place left.
Pay to get them out, nationalize the economy and retract from international finance.
Get carpet bombed by jews too i guess after, that's still a better proposition than being a braindead slave cow.
No, i think you aren't considering the NATO bases around the world.
I heard multiple reports of italy having 100 atomic bombs "on" land and all belonging to US bases.
That's not the pattern.
There are way safer ways to launder, like art.
They just want the political event, then they think how can they also take advantage of their own story in other ways. That's the real pattern.
They wouldnt take this kind of risk just to launder, it has to have a purpose prior to that. Then once they choose to do it they start scheming other things on top of it.
Nice catch anyway.
World peace = tikkun olam = jews profit, others toil
He was pretty much completely opposed to materialism.
He did very good commentary on pedagogy and had a true understanding of human nature.
He did have his crazy sprees and some wrong ideas, sure, but overall there's nothing comparable with marx.
Also, the rich send their kids to steiner school, while sending yours to marx school.
classy ahem!
I don't care and it was never the point. I asked a simple question, very simple. Answer non to be found.
Guy talked about white supremacy, but he couldn't even define it. That say it all in my opinion. When he finally responds, then we can have a discussion. Sadly it's too hard for people who use the term as a scapegoat and would never, ever, provide an actual definition of what they meant. That's why i insulted him. He want to scapegoat people, without even considering them.
Thanks, now i know i can ignore his ideas given he thinks in fantasy only.
He could have answered easily, but sadly no one want to say he lives in pure fantasy like this guy.
Doesn't seem a technicality to me.
If to comment on a behaviour that to me is typical of shills requires me not to say so for any rule, then that rule will effectively block the expression of any negative judgement that may offend.
Considering the themes of this forum, if the rule was enlarged to that effect it would kill the forum in time. Strong disagrees are to be expected, along with negative judgements.
I remind you that we are not talking because i called someone a name, but because i commented on user behaviour in a negative way. Simply i noted a behaviour has been 'typical of shills' in my experience.
For what i think, you'd better sort the difference between the two (open insult vs negative judgement), to restrict the first is to restrict personality, which may have sense in the context of peaceful discussion, but to restrict negative judgement alltogether is to kill personality and accept only zombies.