I don't care and it was never the point. I asked a simple question, very simple. Answer non to be found.
Guy talked about white supremacy, but he couldn't even define it. That say it all in my opinion. When he finally responds, then we can have a discussion. Sadly it's too hard for people who use the term as a scapegoat and would never, ever, provide an actual definition of what they meant. That's why i insulted him. He want to scapegoat people, without even considering them.
Thanks, now i know i can ignore his ideas given he thinks in fantasy only.
He could have answered easily, but sadly no one want to say he lives in pure fantasy like this guy.
No definition relevated. And that is not any answer to my question. I see nothing resolutive there, just a guy avoiding a question, and another (i recognize, in good faith) not wanting to see what this is about.
I think what it is about is pretty obvious given 3 non answers by the guy.
So can he define what he meant by white supremacy, or do i have to fake satisfaction for an answer i asked first that was never given? i'm not going to pretend.
I never wanted any fake agreement. Can this guy answer a simple question about his own thread or not? We wasting time looking for fake agreements if he can't or won't.
Yours are assumptions without any real logic. You are assuming that if aliens existed they would seek, and behave, in a way similar to humans. I find that laughable to be honest.
Not because it is not possible, but because you really couldn't have any idea of what is "possible" from this point of view.
You pretend to know aliens you don't even think exist. That's quite the delusion.
I think if we did we wouldn't know, so i wouldn't discard it. It would also explain lots of stuff. But that's not to say that's what it is. Just that it is surely possible.
You are assuming they operate on your same paradigms.
You are an animal that learned to prey other animals which are based on instinct, through consciousness.
You don't know how an animal preying on another which is itself based on consciousness would go at it.
You also don't know what they prey, if meat, work or energy.
Given this, your suppositions are quite lacky imo.
There's also the smear game where anyone who thinks whites wanting their own countries is because 'muh iq' when it is a quite marginal discussion.
Considering the size of the phenomena of bad faith misrepresentation on the topic, i think it is quite important to understand if who use those words is being authentic or trying to pull off this kind of juxtapositional game.
Because it says a lot wether he's a bad faith or good faith actor imo.
You can read the back and forth and see if this guy gave any sign of good faith.
He's literally generalizing a whole population through a smear definition without even caring to offer a rationale for what he means through that so he can keep doing that. But what do i know, ikr.
They haven’t enslaved us
Would you really think you would know if they did?
No proof they are real isn't proof they aren't.
That's a quite common fallacy.
As long as you don't believe because no evidence that's all good, but from here to say 'then i know they aren't real' is a huge leap.
I guess. I prefer to say what i see plainly and get removed rather than being fake.
You made a point about something you can't define or don't care to. That you proved yourself.
And doing that definitely makes you look veeery smart.
You didn't even define white supremacist.
Are you one of those using those words for any kind of white ethno nationalism anywhere and using iq diff claim as a red herring?
It's very relevant wether you know the meaning of the words you use to entertain your thoughts.
You use a commercial simplicistic and often plain wrong definition.
But nevermind, I got my insight.
Non answer.
Define white supremacy.
You do not want to know what will happen in the 144,000's "sanctuaries".
don't we?
The simplest system ever will always be to hang the bloody guilty lol
No, and i think there is some 'root' in reality, like energetical vampires doing it to have competitor testosterone drop and higher in cortisol.
At the same time it is such a stupid conception of such an equilibrium that it is funny
Everyday a new one.
This explains a lot though
Just because in virtue of epstein release i toured /pol for 10 minutes. Gonna have to recharge for a year or so i guess. Lol
There is another interesting screenshot about this in same thread:
Trump is a 4 year ruler.
Greenland will then be controlled by next clinton or obama.
Feels like lots of people forgets that.
classy ahem!