▲ 1 ▼
MysteriousFedKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

They aren't like you and me.

They want their controlled society for work and meat and fun.

They don't see themselves as humans as we do.

Its not about the dead, its about controlling life.

To them is much like pushing pigs into a hen and cutting off wild leaves from a garden.

Their under servants get raped and tortured as kids, are hyper traumatized, are scared shitless of their masters and hate you for the chance of choosing who you can be in life. For the things they had to do to survive they would never be judged like the others.

▲ 1 ▼
MysteriousFedKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Damn, there's a very famous italian salami company called beretta, i was like, they have been going at it for 500 years now? wow

▲ 2 ▼
MysteriousFedKnight 2 points ago +2 / -0

make communist party

keep private property

racist af

does not recognize jewry as valid religion

Now, minus social score thats a 'communism' i can get behind.

▲ 1 ▼
MysteriousFedKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hah, you got me reminding an old anecdote.

I was surfing forums like 15 years ago (dont even remember the web name) and found an international jewish exchange one in english.

There was a jewish student asking stuff about this topic in the bible, and someone replied to him that the dual dna wasn't a theory and was acknowledged by all rabbis he knew.

Jews need power to hide their history, if they lost their special status they would be hunted down. They know that.

▲ 1 ▼
MysteriousFedKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think you are both right unironically.

On one side, its obvious the jews are minions to something else. Here a lots of views exist on what is that something or someone. But i think most would agree, there is likely something else.

On another level, though, it seem that jews had the right cultural predisposition to become said minions, and anyway, the whole system is gatekept by them as a people.

Which means you won't even get to interact with your wannabe masters if jews are around to run the show.

▲ 1 ▼
MysteriousFedKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why do you say aspect that an animal doesn't? the human being is an animal with such aspects.

To rate it not an animal because of these aspects is quite subjective.

▲ 1 ▼
MysteriousFedKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

How can you be sure rational is an attribute of the soul and not of the structure of the human mind or brain (animal)?

Is human itself a soul attribute, or an animal attribute? do the two kinds cross reference each other?

And to say soul means some but not much without a framework of reference.

Christian framework, one life, rest eternity?

Hindu, many lives, soul evolution, one final destination?

Buddhist, undeclared (weird stuff)?

▲ 2 ▼
MysteriousFedKnight 2 points ago +2 / -0

Mmmh, ok, i understand now, so you took the 'son of the morning' as genealogical. Not unprobable at all.

But in this case, who was yahweh? and who the snake in garden if not enki?

My understanding is that the genesis is much prior to rest of the jewish chronicles and yahweh is a small regional lietunant. But id be curious if you differ there.

On the enki thing i always assumed the bible was written from the point of the elohim leaders or their followers, therefore enlil PoV or sort of. So would make sense Enki's attempt to educate mankind would be unwelcome in the text.

Lastly, if you can muster it, i'd be curious about that enki/marduk antagonism you see.

Do you mean it as the actual beings still being around or factions having sprouted through the conflict?

Was it about Enki still in the end being a elohim leader who wanted to retain control for his own and marduk falling out of touch with the leadership? What was the point of the rebellion? And by chance, do you have any lead about Tiamat?

It's the first time that i hear your version and it's quite different in some points from what i'm used to so forgive if i'm that curious :D Ofcourse i understand it to be all speculation, it's just a super interesting topic to do so about.

▲ 2 ▼
MysteriousFedKnight 2 points ago +2 / -0

Couple points i'd be curious about your thesis:

Why would you identify it as marduk, even within the context of looking for shahar's equivalent in the pantheon - i see he has a twin brother of dusk, a theme you could more easily match up with enki/enlil as marduk didnt have any relevant twin brother or so i read. There seems to be some minor lost versions though.

I would then assume the most probable case is for its rebellion against the rest of pantheon.

But again there is the thing where shahar is the son of el, which again would to point to anu and then enki/enlil as most probable.

While i may not find that as compelling a way to read it, may be missing something also, there is one detail i found that if not for the marduk argument does this shahar sounds quite prototypical in modern day satanic imagery:

https://oldworldgods.com/canaanite/shahar-god/

'A unique aspect of Shahar’s identity is their association with El, the main Canaanite god, as both his son and daughter. To understand Shahar’s gender identity, we must look beyond the conventional gender binaries.

This fluidity expands our understanding of ancient gender constructs and challenges traditional notions of masculinity and femininity in mythology.'

I wonder if this is some modern day interpretional forced bs or there is something to it, considering we know antihuman parasite cults are pretty old

▲ 2 ▼
MysteriousFedKnight 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do all the vegan activists eat children in the secret of the night, ofcourse not, sure. They believe.

Yet how do they end up taking up the mission of those who hate them?

You make them watch hundred of cartoons where the carnivore is the bad stupid guy who ends badly, while the herbivore (bipbip, bugsbunny, etc) is smart cute and winner. After creating this emotional pattern within them, you then release research results that validate that emotion and those people, while believing themselves very smart and good, will be your cultural minions until the end, without even seeing what happened.

That's pretty much it in all fields, i just took one i know well as example.

▲ 3 ▼
MysteriousFedKnight 3 points ago +3 / -0

It seems your opinion, i may be wrong, that satan is a title of Enki? Because Enki is usually the crossway between the religious 'satan' and a more historical one.

Or another case?

▲ 3 ▼
MysteriousFedKnight 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's not like it is its own entity lol.

It's code running.

You can bet any 'unpredicted result' will have been wanted and planned.

▲ 1 ▼
MysteriousFedKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

That 10% is just in case the psyops don't work anymore, although it is also a psyop in itself

▲ 2 ▼
MysteriousFedKnight 2 points ago +2 / -0

The absolute best afaik is coconut oil. Also cheap.

And you can far bypass it healthwise by simply using butter.

▲ 4 ▼
MysteriousFedKnight 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is golden, thanks

also kinda true lol

▲ 1 ▼
MysteriousFedKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Correct except i think freemasonry didnt start out as jewish but as an influential organization centered around hermetic tradition it was slowly infiltrated, being taken over around 1600-700 (this might be skewed tho)

▲ 1 ▼
MysteriousFedKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is rooted in jewish mysticism if not in judaism.

▲ 2 ▼
MysteriousFedKnight 2 points ago +2 / -0

He does append it to freemasons which is 90% the same thing nowadays perhaps.

But islamic takeover its clearly a problem in its own regard, although its true jew shills will try to deflect from jews onto islam.

▲ 1 ▼
MysteriousFedKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

an animal gifted of self awareness and abstract reasoning.

And the word animal implies soul (from 'animus'), it does not deny it.

So if you want you can say souls inside animals, but that's redundant, it's literally the meaning (biology hosting a spirit)

This is also more correct (imo) than saying 'a soul inside an animal' because cultural references aside human is the animal, the soul is the soul and 'human' would therefore be a temporary quality (therefore - animal side)

▲ 1 ▼
MysteriousFedKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are building up delusions and resentment to burst the masses emotional energy in one big shot imo. When the time comes people will die exhausted and desperate, atleast that's my bet.

▲ 2 ▼
MysteriousFedKnight 2 points ago +2 / -0

Perhaps they are preparing for the huge amount of data to be aggregated to 'evolve' and upgrade AI rather than sheer surveillance.

That wouldnt be as per raw data storage per se, but more about computing all of it over and over through ML for AI

▲ 1 ▼
MysteriousFedKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

The real fact that matters imo is that the war is in their territory and very far from US land.

Which mean they have the upper hand when it comes to logistics and transport economics.

Clearly this isn't a factor with less advanced countries like the many in the middle east the US cleared out before.

But Iran is an actual power, however small.

Plus this stuff is really bad on the world stage, if the US really want to destroy iran it will take a holy shit amount of resources, and would destroy any credibility they got left as the "defenders of freedom".

All in all for how easy Trump wants to make it sound, the reality is that taking down Iran is going to be a huge harakiri for US politics.

Not that the shabbos care anyway.

▲ 2 ▼
MysteriousFedKnight 2 points ago +2 / -0

So isn't absorbing light through a glass like a window.

Actually cut the light spectrum in half and make it toxic.

Turns out when you want to go natural it isn't as simple as turning down the AC.

view more: Next ›