I don't understand why people think they can get away with these things in this day and age.
The thing is, I get lost following clicks sometimes. This topic has a whole lot of articles on it. I didn't find bias in the sources. Ars for example used to be a better busier site, but they were pretty good for tech, and comments.
That's a new one ty! That's not my preferance, but I'm sure there's someone that wouldn't mind that somewhere.
I like to post what I find interesting. Some of the things that I find posted I do not think that I would find interesting, but I do.
You only have to injure someone's hands these days enough to make them require speech to text software in order to write. The fact that it's happening to news channels means it's pretty documented. I don't doubt the validity.
I don't care if they mutilate their children. They should give them covid shot boosters too. Then our children won't have to deal with the bullshit we have to deal with.
My son refused to attend school his senior year, " because those people are stupid". He had a modified schedule where he only ever interacted with one single teacher, and his grades had never been better.
Go to r/detrans and read about how they feel abused. Especially the ones with micro penises because of hormones.
If only it wasn't illegal.
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2023-03-hints-non-hallucinogenic-lsd-mood-disorders.html
Those pretty diagram you've seen in commercials for years. They were wrong. But they're legal.
No Evidence That Depression Is Caused by Low Serotonin Levels - Neuroscience News neurosciencenews.com › serotonin
Anthony Peake videos on consciousness are always great.
https://www.ancient-origins.net/opinion-guest-authors/origins-faeries-006634
There's also a part 2
We don't understand the science or philosophy of consciousness. It's an issue that's been around for hundreds of years of modern science. But, ancient people's don't seem to be as clueless.
The opposite of California where it's no longer illegal to knowingly give someone AIDS.
https://gizmodo.com/usb-sticks-freedom-of-the-press-bomb-ecuador-1850254706
Here's another source from the article :
The comment section there has multiple people reporting random USB drives on the ground they're happy they never bothered to pick up.
So many people are disappointed he wasn't ever able to write again.
The proud boys were mostly CI's.
I don't see six fingers. But I do see no hands, and I regional fists.
Dr. Joseph P. Farrell has a great book on this topic.
There are also more interviews with more details.
Diversity was a strength before it was weaponized.
That website has 41 mandatory cookies. You may want to consider cutting and pasting the article. I just read it in the tiny space above the cookie box.
All I know is people don't want to see any of his work no matter what the opinion in the piece you attach happens to be.
People were wearing the dirtiest grossest looking masks too.
Burden just signed a ESG executive order. This is so opposite only our Alzheimer's president would do it.
Thanks for the app recommendation, I'll look for it apk! Walter Bosley started printing interesting out of print books. He's more than a great researcher.
The covid rules made the publishing companies file that the IA was stealing money from them. Anyone using a library that already paid for the book or piracy isn't the publishers audience. They're just too stupid to care.
They are bound by the rules of the facility they wish to use.
Edit : comment at wrong spot.
The part about east coast traffic hit me hard.
I despise ho the internet archive no longer allows downloads. Reading a book on that site is tortorous.
There’s no evidence that the publishers have lost a dime,” Gratz said during oral arguments at a New York district court.
It’s up to a federal judge, John Koeltl, to decide if IA’s digital lending constitutes copyright infringement. During oral arguments, Koeltl’s tough questioning of both Gratz and the plaintiff’s attorney, Elizabeth McNamara, suggested that resolving this matter is a less straightforward task than either side has so far indicated. Koeltl pointed out that because publishers have a right to control the reproduction of their books, the “heart of the case,” was figuring out whether IA’s book scanning violates copyrights by reproducing an already licensed physical book and lending it without paying more licensing fees to publishers.
“Does the library have the right to make a copy of the book that it otherwise owns and then lend that e-book—which it has made without a license and without permission—to patrons of the library?” Koeltl asked Gratz as a tense pushback to IA’s stance that this particular case is just about a library’s right to loan out books.
McNamara argued that many libraries pay licensing fees to publishers to lend e-books, and she said this was the market harmed by IA’s digital lending practices. The burden is on IA to prove that’s not the case, or else it risks being found liable and potentially getting hit with a permanent injunction to stop the alleged infringing behavior. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/03/book-publishers-with-surging-profits-struggle-to-prove-internet-archive-hurt-sales/
Edit :
McNamara seemed to suggest that publishers would have been further enriched if not for IA providing unprecedented free, unlimited e-books access. She also told Koeltl that publishers suing—Hachette, HarperCollins, Penguin Random House, and Wiley—are concerned that there are already some libraries avoiding paying e-book licensing fees by partnering with IA and making their own copies. If the court sanctioned IA’s digitization practices and thousands of libraries started digitizing the books in their collections, the entire e-book licensing market would collapse, McNamara suggested.
These are the publishers that recently got boycotted, and had employees go on strike due to save wages.
I was watching a podcast the other day about the moonwave. There was a theory that the sun's activity caused it. It was interesting to ponder. Did we have any moon waves during this time?