1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Papal infallibility was an idea that cam from the Early Church.

False you already tried to prove this with your Catholic website which I’m guessing you didn’t read. The early church doesn’t not indicate papal infallibility. Hence even Peter being corrected by Paul in the Bible. Why would Paul have jurisdiction over Peter if Peter is infallible?

Just because Pope Honorius was a heretic doesn't make Papal Infallibility wrong.

Yes it does. You had a formally condemned pope,the gates of hell prevailed against your supreme pontiff even early on in the church.

We don’t even have to get into the child sex trafficking, money laundering for intelligence agencies, playing musical chairs with child abusers, tunnels under the Vatican to brothels, or any of the other examples of the gates of hell routinely prevailing over Rome. Maybe it’s a sign to come back to the faith of the early church.

You have a communist pope, you’ll figure it out when you’re ready.

2
MO-Carpenter 2 points ago +2 / -0

The freemasonic spectrum maybe

2
MO-Carpenter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh I firmly believe that no creation is inherently evil. No technology or tool is evil but it can be used for good or less good means.

So we are in agreement there.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

It doesn’t matter to you and plenty of others but it’s significant to some. Different strokes for different folks. The unbroken continuity of evil from ancient times to today, from child sacrifice, greed, lust, war, The worldly rewards for harming yourself spiritually. All the carrot dangling of alien technology is just a fun path for humanity to jump off a cliff chasing. Leading us to a Tower of Babel situation. If their whole goal is to defy God, their unbroken continuity of sexual degeneracy, child abuse, child murder, pedophilia, cannibalism, ect ect all make sense as an attempt to sway humans into self destruction.

I don’t agree with the Amish on everything but man that whole philosophy of only accepting technology that’s helpful is pretty rad

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’ve had similar issues but you’ve gotta recognize that people don’t play by the rules. If they won’t let you play with their toys go find new ones because forcing them to let you isn’t super feasible for most people.

2
MO-Carpenter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just a reminder for anyone who got confused by ancient aliens lying about weight all the time.

This foundation block for the wailing wall is estimated at 570 tons.

The largest stone moved by man was the thunder stone in Russia and it was 1250-1500 tons. This was done in the 1700s before any haters say it was machine moved. They didn’t even use animals for it, it was moved by human strength and ingenuity alone. We know what rollers, hoists, muscle, and mind can do.

2
MO-Carpenter 2 points ago +2 / -0

A limited hangout is the deliberate revelation of some information (e.g. about malfeasance) to try to confuse and/or prevent discovery of other information

2
MO-Carpenter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Flynn was involved with intelligence, gives people a QR code which in case people were unaware can be used to identify and snag information from the device that scans it. He can snag your phone info and collect data by getting users to engage with his QR code. There’s no way this isn’t malicious. It’s too obvious.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

You have to say papal infallibility is limited because it’s retarded and would easily prove the gates of hell have prevailed multiple times against Rome.

You have to say papal infallibility is limited because it’s a doctrine made up in the 1800s.

The whole church together in agreement synodally (like in the Bible) is the pillar of truth. Not any one bishop.

Historically Rome appealed to other jurisdictions to settle disputes. So Rome was not the only appellate court.

An ecumenical council anathemized a pope in 600. The Vatican agreed with it. Was pope honorius infallible? The fact that you’ve had a literally teaching heresy pope that was rejected by both the East and West shows the early church did not adhere to the lies of Vatican 1.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because greed, nepotism, conspiracy, and evil can corrupt people of all backgrounds, not just Jews? They’re definitely deepstate as fuck, equally as shady as all major banking. They’re in with the WEF, cancel people, do all the ESG woke bs.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most crime is men, most inventions are men, most innovations, workplace deaths, combat deaths, most likely victims of violent crime and rape (think prisons). Most likely to commit suicide.

Yes men are overwhelmingly the majority of crime, punishment, as well as everything else. What conclusions do you draw from men based on the crime stats?

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Except many Eastern bishops ran to Rome for help when they argued with each other...

That’s how you handle synodal issues. You can appeal to other jurisdictions and they kinda act as an appellate court.

Rome would be first among equals, if they didn’t change so much from the early church. Papal infallibility is too far. We just have the different opinion perhaps. The church synodal church agreements can be the inspired direction of the Holy Spirit. We have seen time and time again the wildest popes of infamy, pirate pope, popes for sale, pope underground tunnels to a brothel, the infallibility is too much.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

First among equals is the how the ecumenical councils agreed upon. The East and West agreed upon that in the early days of the church. Orthodox still would hold Rome as first among equals if Rome came back to the faith. Bishops with cannonical privileges is way different than having an infallible pope.

The bishop of Rome is important but not infallible.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Excommunications are biblical, let’s keep that going. I don’t know where you’re getting 3 divorces from but that’s wrong just to address it. Contraception is more tolerated among Roman Catholics than EO, yes some fringe accept contraception on both sides but they are minorities. Disagreements in the church? Yeah have you read the Bible that happens. That’s why church issues are settled synodally, like in the Bible.

We may have heretics in the Catholic Church hierarchy, but at least the official teachings are what Christians have believed since the First Century!

Papal infallibility, purgatory, unam sanctam, the immaculate conception of Mary, all aren’t found in the first century of the church.

There’s a reason why the papacy had to use forged documents to establish their rule. The Vatican admits it used false documents.

Your Vatican says that the Eastern Orthodox Church has the valid sacraments, and has apostolic succession. Even Rome can’t object to the fact that EO has held fast to the traditions of the apostles.

At the end of the day, the pope is a false authority, wearing a yamulka, eating unleavened bread Eucharist, with Rothschilds and the CIA running his money. It’s not looking great for your “first century” fantasy. Was Vatican 1 or Vatican 2 in the first century?

2
MO-Carpenter 2 points ago +2 / -0

If your morality isn’t rooted in something that’s the consequence anyone can justify any action as “minimizing harm”.

Klaus and Bill Gates legit think that reducing the human population will reduce human suffering. In a evil autistic sociopathic way yes that’s an argument. It’s only able to be made because our society has given up on God and metaphysics.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Have you ever considered the same church, the same sacraments done without the pope or the Rothschild Jewish papal bankers? Come home to orthodoxy.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

No New Normal is one of the most active ones.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Interesting, I find it sus regardless, targeted attack could be a psyop to make the trans community feel more attacked. Could be angry parents, could be unrelated. My family in NC thinks is related but I don’t know nothing I wasn’t there.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›