Are we still doing 9/11 conspiracies? They ain't sending their best.
A 16 story building isn't going to be under any structural stress compared to the 110 story twin towers. And that's not even considering the difference in square footage between floors. https://www.euronews.com/2025/11/18/blaze-in-croatian-capital-zagreb-destroys-landmark-16-storey-vjesnik-news-tower
Try harder.
That was always an oxymoron and used as propaganda.
Actual science has never relied on trust.
They don't test for that sort of bullshit because "God did it" is a non-testable hypothesis. You can never be sure if god did something or not, therefore it's useless to test for it.
The articles are evidence that relying on prayer alone is not a reliable treatment for ailments. They aren't trying to explain anything. They are simply reporting the facts.
If prayer works, you can prove it right now.
Pray for me to change my mind.
If I don't, then you're just a fucking lunatic (or a pedo kike trying to poison another well).
The magic sky wizard said so. Sadly the wackos are killing their children with this BS. Or maybe it's better they don't reproduce.....
https://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/national-international/ella-foster-faith-healing-death/29977/
I've noticed. Yandex has been more useful.
The "foam cloud" falling from the sky, often seen in viral videos, is typically not a real cloud but rather a large mass of foam, often originating from industrial processes like mining or chemical manufacturing. These foam-like substances, sometimes mistaken for clouds, are often created by the condensation of water vapor or gas due to human activity, or by the mixing of water and soap-like chemicals used in industrial processes.
Of course it has uses. My objection is to "HTTPS everywhere".
Sometimes my traffic isn't going over an ISP. So I don't give a shit about DNS. But the browser still complains as if it has any idea of what's going on.
"HTTPS everywhere" is such a stupid concept. Not all data is sensitive. All it does is increase power consumption. Encryption/decryption isn't free.
Or the whole thing is a psyops?
Yes, yes you are.
What the hell is this? A bridge troll with down syndrome?
Kill it with fire.
So flat earth wasn't stupid enough for you? Have you tried eating tide pods? I hear they're great.
It's wild speculation that would be very easy to verify with horizontal drilling. Why aren't they drilling?
I think the method is valid by the way, but how the experiment is conducted, how the pixel tomograms are selected, how depth is reconstructed, and how natural voids can be separated from artifical and architectural ones are all details buried in the heavily technical aspects of Synthetic Aperture RADAR signal processing. As in all science investigations, reproducibility is a must. An independent team must be able to reproduce the data before we can even begin to know if what was observed represents true voids made by someone, anyone. https://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1345370,1346568#msg-1346568
From another post
For me, the depth came when I spend the time with Biondi's mathematical model of the geometry of the system from platform to pixel and back. The problem is that Biondi does not completely explain how he turned the math into his string of signal processing commands and we think we know why. I am sure you can put two and two together. https://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1345370,1345488#msg-1345488
This is a shit test just like the mrna clot shots and chemtrails.
Believing any of it means you have failed the test.
This is nothing more than bad statistical analysis. It would be neat if I'm wrong. But until it's verified it's just a distraction. And something like this would be relatively easy to verify with Horizontal Directional Drilling.
I think the method is valid by the way, but how the experiment is conducted, how the pixel tomograms are selected, how depth is reconstructed, and how natural voids can be separated from artifical and architectural ones are all details buried in the heavily technical aspects of Synthetic Aperture RADAR signal processing. As in all science investigations, reproducibility is a must. An independent team must be able to reproduce the data before we can even begin to know if what was observed represents true voids made by someone, anyone. https://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1345370,1346568#msg-1346568
From another post
For me, the depth came when I spend the time with Biondi's mathematical model of the geometry of the system from platform to pixel and back. The problem is that Biondi does not completely explain how he turned the math into his string of signal processing commands and we think we know why. I am sure you can put two and two together. https://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1345370,1345488#msg-1345488
Go poison some other well. If they were going to spray us with chemicals they'd put it in auto gas so we could breath it at ground level. Why would they want it way up above 18k feet? So we can look at it? So there's visible evidence? Chemtrails up in the sky makes no sense.
Oh look, here's 100 years of pole shift. And guess what? It doesn't matter on human timescales. Receipts for you to look over:
https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/wandering-geomagnetic-poles
And you forgot to 'educate' me on chemtrails. Go on, I know you want to.
The pole has shifted many times in the past. It will continue to shift in the future.
It will never shift fast enough to matter on human time scale.
Now tell me about chemtrails you stupid fear-mongering dumbass.
'Although this occupation is forced, it is unthinkable for the Gaîté Lyrique to throw these people out onto the street in the middle of winter,'
Funny, the people you're sheltering would have zero remorse if they could do that to you.
Just more proof that absolutely nothing will snap people out of their brainwashing.
The only solution is to cast the earth into the sun.
means there has to be some truth to it.
No. Stupid kike.
It's some trolls but mostly well-poisoning kike faggots.
These are the same people saying Elon's booster catch didn't happen. They will say anything no matter how outrageous.
Never, this is clearly the fault of white men.
Fuck off you stupid faggot kike.
If you're trying to say the towers came down unnaturally, I already agree with you.
But the evidence you're presenting is laughable. It's so bad it just makes you look like a crackpot. Which is probably the point, discrediting the theory.