1
MCMoneyPants 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's wild speculation that would be very easy to verify with horizontal drilling. Why aren't they drilling?

I think the method is valid by the way, but how the experiment is conducted, how the pixel tomograms are selected, how depth is reconstructed, and how natural voids can be separated from artifical and architectural ones are all details buried in the heavily technical aspects of Synthetic Aperture RADAR signal processing. As in all science investigations, reproducibility is a must. An independent team must be able to reproduce the data before we can even begin to know if what was observed represents true voids made by someone, anyone. https://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1345370,1346568#msg-1346568

From another post

For me, the depth came when I spend the time with Biondi's mathematical model of the geometry of the system from platform to pixel and back. The problem is that Biondi does not completely explain how he turned the math into his string of signal processing commands and we think we know why. I am sure you can put two and two together. https://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1345370,1345488#msg-1345488

1
MCMoneyPants 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is a shit test just like the mrna clot shots and chemtrails.

Believing any of it means you have failed the test.

2
MCMoneyPants 2 points ago +3 / -1

This is nothing more than bad statistical analysis. It would be neat if I'm wrong. But until it's verified it's just a distraction. And something like this would be relatively easy to verify with Horizontal Directional Drilling.

I think the method is valid by the way, but how the experiment is conducted, how the pixel tomograms are selected, how depth is reconstructed, and how natural voids can be separated from artifical and architectural ones are all details buried in the heavily technical aspects of Synthetic Aperture RADAR signal processing. As in all science investigations, reproducibility is a must. An independent team must be able to reproduce the data before we can even begin to know if what was observed represents true voids made by someone, anyone. https://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1345370,1346568#msg-1346568

From another post

For me, the depth came when I spend the time with Biondi's mathematical model of the geometry of the system from platform to pixel and back. The problem is that Biondi does not completely explain how he turned the math into his string of signal processing commands and we think we know why. I am sure you can put two and two together. https://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1345370,1345488#msg-1345488

-1
MCMoneyPants -1 points ago +2 / -3

Go poison some other well. If they were going to spray us with chemicals they'd put it in auto gas so we could breath it at ground level. Why would they want it way up above 18k feet? So we can look at it? So there's visible evidence? Chemtrails up in the sky makes no sense.

0
MCMoneyPants 0 points ago +1 / -1

Oh look, here's 100 years of pole shift. And guess what? It doesn't matter on human timescales. Receipts for you to look over:

https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/wandering-geomagnetic-poles

And you forgot to 'educate' me on chemtrails. Go on, I know you want to.

-7
MCMoneyPants -7 points ago +1 / -8

The pole has shifted many times in the past. It will continue to shift in the future.

It will never shift fast enough to matter on human time scale.

Now tell me about chemtrails you stupid fear-mongering dumbass.

4
MCMoneyPants 4 points ago +4 / -0

'Although this occupation is forced, it is unthinkable for the Gaîté Lyrique to throw these people out onto the street in the middle of winter,'

Funny, the people you're sheltering would have zero remorse if they could do that to you.

Just more proof that absolutely nothing will snap people out of their brainwashing.

The only solution is to cast the earth into the sun.

1
MCMoneyPants 1 point ago +1 / -0

means there has to be some truth to it.

No. Stupid kike.

5
MCMoneyPants 5 points ago +7 / -2

It's some trolls but mostly well-poisoning kike faggots.

These are the same people saying Elon's booster catch didn't happen. They will say anything no matter how outrageous.

2
MCMoneyPants 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/350442196/who-commander-yvonne-gray-captain-stricken-hmnzs-manawanui

After 19 years in the Royal Navy, in 2012, Gray moved to New Zealand with her wife after falling in love with the country while on holiday.

Gray joined the New Zealand Navy, deciding to continue the career she began back in the UK.

1
MCMoneyPants 1 point ago +2 / -1

Drive a manual or you're not really driving.

2
MCMoneyPants 2 points ago +5 / -3

Voting is a placebo, don't bother. The rest is always a good idea.

0
MCMoneyPants 0 points ago +1 / -1

Once I read the description I saw it immediately. Before that it just looked like a "C". Pretty easy to imagine a totally different flying craft https://newatlas.com/aircraft/zeva-evtol-flying-saucer-tail-sitter-superman/

The photo in the article is reported to be a photocopy of an email printout.

2
MCMoneyPants 2 points ago +3 / -1

"we've lost the technology" ... to build a Saturn V. But that's ok, because we wouldn't build another Saturn V, we'd build something better. See SpaceX. Metallurgy, semiconductors, 3D manufacturing methods are all hugely improved from when we built the V.

But you know that, because this isn't an honest conversation. I just wanted to point out the holes in your propaganda for others reading this.

-2
MCMoneyPants -2 points ago +4 / -6

Moon landing hoaxers are a mossad psyop.

Jews are jealous whites were able to do something they could never do.

3
MCMoneyPants 3 points ago +3 / -0

We know what's going on.

You're shoveling FUD. knock it off.

3
MCMoneyPants 3 points ago +3 / -0

This whole "omg mossad can turn any electronic into an explosive" has got to be a psyop.

Those are landmines. They're designed to explode.

Normal electronics simply do not have the chemical or potential energy to explode no matter how much EM you blast them with. Look up lipo fire videos. They're not explosions.

view more: Next ›