Good start though IMO he missed some rather important factors such as technological platforms and the extent to which intentional coordination occurs (ie bilderberg). He alludes to the impact of platform censorship but does not focus on sociotechnical as a major force. Most the talks at Davos etc focus on this more than $.
I also personally believe there's major spiritual forces at play too. Though, this is a whole separate discussion.
Well i guess we're disagreeing here then. I'll admit it's not necessarily strong evidence but i also don't view the claim as requiring additional scrutiny. Since we disagree on the burden of proof for this claim and since tire clearly interested in the topic, why don't you explore it and report what you find? Either way we're not going to agree so it's not worth the back and forth- and certainly not the personal attacks. Shill tactics.
It is bizarre that this phenomenon continues to be reproducible. I view it through a skeptical lens and question whether somehow experimenters are inadvertently influencing results. But, they go on to use double blind studies where even the nature of the study is disguised. Then I question whether there's a flaw in inferential statistics related to convergence in small samples. But, this would implicate many scientific "findings"- many of which we are not skeptical.
I'm not sure what part of this you're disagreeing with. The shortage and simultaneous increase in cases of syphilis are clearly documented. So if this is an "idiotic inference" what do you propose as an alternative explanation? Or, are you just here to criticize? I see you don't actually post content
DOJ are literally stassi, political police