2
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

I guess my point was more along the lines of you need things like the f35 (maybe not that specific airframe) in order to be able to leverage a10s. But take the whole point to an extreme- you could have gyrocopters with snipers on them if you sufficiently owned the skies

2
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seriously the A10 is the workhorse. Though it makes no sense in scenarios where you don't already have air superiority (it can't dog fight)

2
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

The brain isn't even close to fully formed yet. They can't make informed decisions. This is the point obviously. Though why do this if they already control the voting machines?

13
KiloRomeo 13 points ago +13 / -0

strengthen our democracy

This is code word for increasing probability to be able subtly manipulate the outcome of the election. Prediction: record turn out in PA causes unexpected outcome in 2024.

2
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Something feels incomplete about this analysis because, if the chemtrails are sufficient, why also use the vaccine? One potential difference is that the jab contains LNPs that enable it to transcend the blood brain barrier. The spikes can also get to the brain one synthesized and in the blood so there's that nice little feature

2
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Needs its own post. Also- don't forget the "build back better" stage

1
KiloRomeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jesus was a white man

How did you reach this conclusion

1
KiloRomeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is another example if a meta conspiracy I've been tracking. For some time now I've noticed that the uniparty uses the term "fact sheet" as a dog whistle to inform controlled media of wrongthink

2
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

We'll see more Lahainas before this charade is over

2
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

I do think you have a point about a unique opportunity to get 30 yr notes. But, 4% is only enough if you're basically reverse mortgaging yourself (ie planning on burning through your assets). 6-8% is required to grow in excess of inflation over the last 30 years.

I know we've discussed before but to restate- i think assets continue to absorb the fiat and see inflationary pressure for the foreseeable future. I might be wrong but I'd caution against seeking hard assets since this certainly seems like the move they want you to make - ie "own nothing"

6
KiloRomeo 6 points ago +6 / -0

He's in on it all- Masonic and what not. Controlled op 💯

2
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

I actually look forward to this chapter if this is the case. Don't forget they messed with his family. You know it wasn't always republicans and democrats- it used to be Whigs vs democrats. Maybe we're headed towards the emergence of a new party.

1
KiloRomeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

It would just be trading deflation for inflation. Canceling debt for folks who are not savers is a potential source of short term stimulus- i think this is what he's after prior to election. Not to mention the pandering to voters (as if voting mattered)

3
KiloRomeo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Add 15% unemployment to this and it's going to be a mess

2
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

30 million people will have to start paying in 2 weeks. This will get choppy

9
KiloRomeo 9 points ago +9 / -0

Where in the world. I mean i knew pro football was fake for a while now but i didn't realize it was WWE fake

1
KiloRomeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nah i think we hyperinflate. This occurs because as you've stated previously the dollar is still the king of garbage heap.

by DrLeaks
5
KiloRomeo 5 points ago +5 / -0

The gop is so terrible at wielding power that the rational inference is that they're purposefully inept; they exist only as the social lubricant that the left uses to ease the resistance to their corruption

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›