▲ 2 ▼
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Literally working on brain control and mass surveillance tech being supported by people under social control caused by ai bots

▲ 1 ▼
KiloRomeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

I could see this

▲ 2 ▼
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are you kidding me? Wasn't it obvious? He's clearly part of the system, controlled op. He's used his AI bots to brainwash an army of delusional fan boys who are happy to over pay for stocks and tinfoil cars

▲ 2 ▼
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think they still seek secrecy. They only exposed themselves as much as they had to for coordination

by DrLeaks
▲ 6 ▼
KiloRomeo 6 points ago +6 / -0

According to the article the EPA said: ""Residents in the area and tens of miles away may smell odors coming from the site. This is because the byproducts of the controlled burn have a low odor threshold"

I call BS. What reason do we have to believe anything the government has to say- especially following the Covid theater. The dead fish, dead birds, and dead plants tell a very different story. Why do they always lie? Depop

▲ 2 ▼
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Depop, control, all the above. Plus who said it was us? I think it might be foreign military op

▲ 3 ▼
KiloRomeo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes it's being manipulated, we're being manipulated. They're covering up a Chernobyl scale event that might have been caused by agent saboteurs.

▲ 4 ▼
KiloRomeo 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think you're missing the mark on this one. They're telling residents that it's safe when clearly it's not. They're not being honest about the cause not the consequences.

▲ 9 ▼
KiloRomeo 9 points ago +9 / -0

Well first of all their primary advantage is secrecy. Defeat this and you defeat them. Of course they realize this so most of their efforts go to increasing censorship, increasing secrecy, causing confusion.

Then you have numbers. Their approach here is clearly divide and conquer + misdirection.

▲ 2 ▼
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

The knowledge of the chemical composition of chemtrails appears to predate the general awareness of the same

▲ 3 ▼
KiloRomeo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Could also be an attempt to broaden purview of TSA as it relates to trains

▲ 3 ▼
KiloRomeo 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's astute to realize that they're representing multiple "opposing" viewpoints. There's even threads where they argue with each other to try to create a smokescreen. Makes me chuckle.

▲ 5 ▼
KiloRomeo 5 points ago +5 / -0

Was thinking about this too. She represents deception, seduction, and destruction on behalf of a world government during the time of the Antichrist. Before the halftime she was wearing a cross which is deceptive. Then the symbolism of corrupting the innocent - those who were dressed in white increasingly being seduced until they become engrossed. Then they were removed which symbolizes the destruction.

▲ 1 ▼
KiloRomeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the bill is proposing this where one person is much older (ie more than a few years apart) then I am not going to defend it in fact quite the opposite. Is that what it states? Because I suspect this is instead a specific statute addressing the case where both people are essentially minors.

▲ 1 ▼
KiloRomeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Looks like it passed. A few people opposed it okay so why? Have you figured out a good alternative for teens who want to have sex with each other? Please share your solution.

▲ 2 ▼
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ecuador means migrants

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

By making this change he is incentivizing content creators to moderate comments such that they are as friendly. This gets around concerns over platform censorship because it will be up to the content creators. It's all too obvious.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›