Here's the actual trailer: https://youtu.be/SgwKZAMx_gM
Was thinking about this too. She represents deception, seduction, and destruction on behalf of a world government during the time of the Antichrist. Before the halftime she was wearing a cross which is deceptive. Then the symbolism of corrupting the innocent - those who were dressed in white increasingly being seduced until they become engrossed. Then they were removed which symbolizes the destruction.
If the bill is proposing this where one person is much older (ie more than a few years apart) then I am not going to defend it in fact quite the opposite. Is that what it states? Because I suspect this is instead a specific statute addressing the case where both people are essentially minors.
By making this change he is incentivizing content creators to moderate comments such that they are as friendly. This gets around concerns over platform censorship because it will be up to the content creators. It's all too obvious.
NAY
- Defining the boundaries around this topic is too difficult and will inevitably turn into the need to catalog and further define it. Thus, ironically, they force us to do the work of perpetuating their ideologies.
- I care too much about the Mods who are under appreciated to advocate them wasting their time on this. Would rather have them focus on rooting out handshake provocateur since I see these as a more strategic threat.
- The precedent is also problematic. It opens the door for small bandwagons of socks puppets to brigade for censoring topics their sponsors dislike.
The knowledge of the chemical composition of chemtrails appears to predate the general awareness of the same