Which is comparable to the normal rate but it contains 700 ineligible people in the denominator which is an academically dishonest practice

No

I suspect that their study is flawed but i don't want to spend the time to read it

It's this study: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2104983. Look at the data not their conclusions. 104 spontaneous abortions and only. They do a good job of disguising it but logically anyone who got vaccinated during third trimester should be excluded from the denominator for determining percentage of miscarriage because in the third trimester a failed pregnancy is classified as a still birth. So, if we remove those 700 people, the math becomes 104/(827- 700)=83% Here's a the relevant text from the article:

Among 827 participants who had a completed pregnancy, the pregnancy resulted in a live birth in 712 (86.1%), in a spontaneous abortion in 104 (12.6%), in stillbirth in 1 (0.1%), and in other outcomes (induced abortion and ectopic pregnancy) in 10 (1.2%). A total of 96 of 104 spontaneous abortions (92.3%) occurred before 13 weeks of gestation (Table 4), and 700 of 712 pregnancies that resulted in a live birth (98.3%) were among persons who received their first eligible vaccine dose in the third trimester.

It's this study:
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2104983.

Look at the data not their conclusions. 104 spontaneous abortions and only. They do a good job of disguising it but logically anyone who got vaccinated during third trimester should be excluded from the denominator for determining percentage of miscarriage because in the third trimester a failed pregnancy is classified as a still birth. So, if we remove those 700 people, the math becomes 104/(827- 700)=83%

Here's a the relevant text from the article:

Among 827 participants who had a completed pregnancy, the pregnancy resulted in a live birth in 712 (86.1%), in a spontaneous abortion in 104 (12.6%), in stillbirth in 1 (0.1%), and in other outcomes (induced abortion and ectopic pregnancy) in 10 (1.2%). A total of 96 of 104 spontaneous abortions (92.3%) occurred before 13 weeks of gestation (Table 4), and 700 of 712 pregnancies that resulted in a live birth (98.3%) were among persons who received their first eligible vaccine dose in the third trimester.

How much are they paying you

What if sterility was actually the primary goal of this whole virus/vax charade

Miscarriage part starts ~ 30 min in: https://rumble.com/v2c624e-obgyns-speak-first-obgyn-panel-breaking-their-silence-on-covid-shot-adverse.html

Le cordon bleu

Too bad they're not Starbucks because then they could just tell their customers to like it

There's no scandal here- they received exactly what they purchased 0.9999 pure.

There's no scandal here. China bought 0.9999 gold and that's what they received. They're trying to draw attention away from their history of doping

There's no scandal here other than China wanting free gold and wanting to tarnish the reputation of others in order to take the pressure off of their history of doping. They got what they paid for, there's no victim here other than the Perth mint who has been libeled.

Remote lowers ability to detect vax damage

So is the DNC

Zh/https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/splc-attorney-among-23-antifa-rioters-arrested-domestic-terrorism-charges

Why did you choose that example? Is that your alt account

What's the broader context here?

Yeah maybe. The soil accumulation part of this theory is interesting to me.

We can do that here if you want. Post stuff we find throughout the month

Thanks these are even more specific and more common

Thanks that's what i was thinking of earlier

It speaks to proof that weather modification industry exists. Many in this forum are aware of that. Normies don't believe it because they're told not to.

Sure... but there's videos of people studying them using this equipment to prove it contains barium and what not so it's also related

If we give up on then then we lose the war of attrition