1
KiloRomeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah the DNC has bylaws (which they voted to change to stop Bernie last time lol) and this has nothing to do with state's laws. They won't be in the ballot in certain states. That's a first

1
KiloRomeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nothing that we know of so far but this whole thing is suspicious enough to me that it seems like an area to explore. Every federal computer has their software

10
KiloRomeo 10 points ago +10 / -0

One of the biggest issues here is that multiple states have already certified who will be on their ballots. This might cause no candidate for the Democratic Party in these ballots and perhaps give electors the ability to choose their own candidate. So... the election is even more open to fraud and manipulation than it was in 2020!

3
KiloRomeo 3 points ago +3 / -0

I agree they should disclose the date the position was created. Were they long dated or were they close to expiry?

4
KiloRomeo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Posted my theory as a separate thread but at a high level i see this as some sort of cover up, presumably for J13. There's no way an update goes out without testing. The timing after the RNC and during an investigation by the house is really suspicious.

5
KiloRomeo 5 points ago +5 / -0

Isn't this just the stock price? It's been trading between 30 and 40 so it's still inside that range

1
KiloRomeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is common. They cannot have anyone near entrance to stage. Security risk. I've seen it numerous times at other events

2
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not UN, at least not at first. A "state of emergency" to give cause to use the military. Meanwhile mobs of antifa and useful idiots roam to goad civilians to resist which gives them cause to use force to squash "domestic extremism". Same playbook for last decade.

1
KiloRomeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think there's a conspiracy here but i don't think it's willful misconduct by the USSS cs team.

I tend to buy into the patsy theory. It's the same playbook they use for all assassins. Who was he really?

2
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

I tend to agree. I think a lot of people underestimate how quickly events unfold. The rules of engagement differ by encounter. I don't think the CS team is suspect, they acquired target quickly and accurately. Maybe they could have done better but the shooter was probably only in the roof for a few seconds before hand. Bigger failure is perimeter security.

1
KiloRomeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Section 230 prevents these platforms from being liable for the stupid things their users post. If they pull this, then they're liable and they go bankrupt.

-1
KiloRomeo -1 points ago +1 / -2

Good point. Self preservation is a strong motivator and not all cops are loyalists but yeah he should have intervened. Maybe he was calling for back up. Training probably differs between beat cops and ss

3
KiloRomeo 3 points ago +3 / -0

They should have had someone in the roof of that building or at a minimum patrolling the perimeter

0
KiloRomeo 0 points ago +1 / -1

I'm thinking these events were seconds apart. He leaves and then the shooting. If they were further apart then there's competency questions sure

0
KiloRomeo 0 points ago +2 / -2

By the time he went to call in the credible threat it was likely over. In my opinion a lot of the commenters under estimate the adrenaline and speed of events.

1
KiloRomeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

The interest rates are what they are required to pay by the market in order to convince other countries to continue to purchase their debt. They make a lot of noise about the economy and caring about individuals and so on but in reality the market determines whether they need to raise rates. They lower rates because it gives them economic growth which increases the total amount they can issue.

3
KiloRomeo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well that's another conspiracy theory confirmed! Now do Antifa

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›