Is that socialism or paternalism? I understand what you mean here but i think there’s an important difference. I’d be more in favor of a paternalistic republic which i think reflects what you’re mentioning about historic
The units here are “z scores” which statisticians use to measure degrees of difference. Anything over 2 would be considered non random. Keep in mind though we have no idea what they’re normalizing against do hard to interpret.
They have to stop before they wipe out everybody. Don’t forget they need a certain % to pull the levers and push the buttons for them. They’ve found a method to filter out the “useless eaters” (their words not mine)
Thanks for posting this. You’re not crazy I’ve thought the same thing. I even posted sky this a while back. I found some data for this where i placed it at 1-1.5%. I did this by comparing labor participation rate to job openings rates.
You can actually. I saw a study on this back in august. Basically they estimate it by using other conditions that have known population rates. For instance, how many people got condition X where X is generally understood to be unrelated to vax damage. Then compare the rates and you have your estimate. This method places it at ~25x
https://www.ariss.org/contact-the-iss.html