I'd like to see this expressed as a percentage of people vaxed rather than raw number. They don't adjust for rate... if we assume that the vaccine has no efficacy and since something like 70% or more are already vax, we should expect more total cases and deaths. Now vax might have negative efficacy (ie be harmful) but again hard to say without adjusting for rate.
I agree that the official explanation doesn't seem sufficient. Though it fits within the official narrative. Remember that time last week when we found out China is collecting DNA from Americans? We're witnessing the era of competitive genocidal bio weapons.
To discuss this we would need separate the criticism of PCR as a technique from the question of whether SARS2 is a real virus. Clearly this gene sequence exists and has tangible value to moderna. Implication at a minimum is that it's justification for a vaccine that creates spikes.
I called this. These planes are common, especially in capitals, since these vassal states provide them their resources. Short of seeing troops walk off the plane or evidence on the ground that they're UN, hard to reliably connect the dots.
Yeah what have they all had in common