1
Jacobin 1 point ago +1 / -0

How did you even come across it then? And, having come across it, what compelled you to watch it if not your personal interest?

If these things are a guilty pleasure of yours you’re allowed to just say so..

I find myself watching YouTube videos whose whole raison d’etre is hating on Joe Rogans stable of comedians for example

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mate, don’t you feel a bit weird with all that twee patter, calling some fella you’ve never met and don’t even know if he existed your lord and saying you have a burning love for him and all that?

It’s a bit odd isn’t it

3
Jacobin 3 points ago +3 / -0

A hexagon is a cube in 2D form. The hexagon of course being the inner section of the hexagram or so called star of David.

A flat packed cube makes a cross.

Concealed within the symbol of Judaism is the cube, concealed within the cube is the symbol of Christianity

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +1 / -0

You would like it if I misunderstood many things (I’m Janschology btw) but Jesus himself said multiple times that he is only come for the lost sheep of the house of Israel. He wasn’t interested in anyone other than Jews.

He said it is not appropriate to take the children’s (Jews) food and to cast it to the dogs (non Jews). When he sent his apostles out, he told them to stay away from the gentiles but to only seek out the lost sheep of the house of Israel. When he said I have come do that you may have life and have it more abundantly, he was only addressing his fellow Jews.

Do you acknowledge that Jesus is the person spoken of in Psalm 110? Jesus himself references Psalm 110 on a few occasions.

In which case, do you acknowledge that Jesus plan is to fill the nations with dead bodies?

Do you acknowledge that he is to rule in the midst of his enemies and that this was accomplished by making Rome the seat of Christianity?

You can assert that I have misunderstood many things until we’re both blue in the face but I have given you a nice, digestible amount of references that you could demonstrate my misunderstanding with. I do hope you will address Psalm 110 for me (and the similar sentiments in Revelation)

You did ask me to expand on what I wrote after all.

I hope your last response isn’t the peak of your riposte…

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pagan is just a collective term for not-Christian ie not-Jewish, just like goyim

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bad acting. Not realistic at all

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +1 / -0

1 Sam 2:10 references the LORD (in Hebrew ’Yehovah’) Psa 50:6 references God (in Hebrew ‘elohiym’, which is plural) Ecc 13:16 references elohiym also (plural) 1 Kings 22:19 talks about Yehovah again. As does Psa 11:4, but Psa 47:8 talks about Elohiym again.

So, the references that you yourself have given talk about different entities all translated as ‘god’.

What, in your understanding, are the differences between Yehovah and Elohiym? Bearing in mind that Elohiym is plural.

Let us see the wisdom and understanding of your own interpretation…

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, I clearly know more than you having at least read the Bible.

It doesn’t matter whether I believe in it or not. The fact is that the Bible does NOT state that Yah is the almighty creator, not even once

2
Jacobin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Earlobes don’t contain cartilage, hence why they bleed so much

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earlobe

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes you do, the capillaries in the ears contain plenty of blood

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +1 / -0

The shots were fired from his rifle

2
Jacobin 2 points ago +2 / -0

So you need to be a doctor to query why having a chunk of your ear allegedly blown off would be accompanied by an immediate cessation of bleeding?

Yeah, don’t think so buddy. Also, why so angry?

3
Jacobin 3 points ago +3 / -0

If a bullet grazed an upper earlobe causing it to bleed, how long would it take for the bleeding to stop on its own

If a bullet grazes an upper earlobe, causing it to bleed, the time it takes for the bleeding to stop on its own can vary based on several factors, including the severity of the wound, the individual's health, and whether appropriate first aid is administered. Generally, minor cuts and grazes to the earlobe might take anywhere from a few minutes to around 20-30 minutes to stop bleeding on their own, provided there are no complications.

To help control the bleeding and speed up the process, the following steps can be taken:

  1. Apply Pressure: Use a clean cloth or gauze to apply gentle pressure to the wound.
  2. Elevate the Area: Keep the head elevated to reduce blood flow to the area.
  3. Clean the Wound: Once the bleeding slows or stops, clean the wound gently with water and mild soap to prevent infection.
  4. Apply an Antiseptic: Use an antiseptic ointment to reduce the risk of infection.
  5. Bandage: Cover the wound with a sterile bandage to protect it.

If the bleeding is severe, doesn't stop after 20-30 minutes of pressure, or if there are signs of infection or other complications, medical attention should be sought immediately.

It wouldn’t stop within seconds then? If it stopped within seconds, what might that indicate

If bleeding from a grazed earlobe stops within seconds, it might indicate several things:

  1. Very Minor Injury: The graze might be extremely superficial, causing minimal damage to the blood vessels in the skin.
  2. Effective Initial Clotting: The individual's blood may clot very quickly, effectively sealing the wound almost immediately.
  3. Minimal Blood Flow: The area affected might have less blood flow, contributing to faster cessation of bleeding.

In general, for minor cuts or grazes, it is not uncommon for bleeding to stop quickly if the injury is not deep and does not involve larger blood vessels. However, if bleeding stops almost instantaneously, it typically suggests that the injury is quite minor.

What if a chunk of ear was missing as a result of the wound?

If a chunk of the ear is missing as a result of the wound, it is a more serious injury than a simple graze. The bleeding in such cases is likely to be more significant and might not stop within seconds. Here are the considerations and steps to take:

Considerations

  1. Severity of Blood Loss: Missing a chunk of the ear can lead to significant bleeding due to the rich blood supply in the ear.
  2. Infection Risk: There is a higher risk of infection with a more significant injury.
  3. Need for Medical Attention: This type of injury typically requires immediate medical attention to control bleeding, prevent infection, and possibly repair the damage.

Immediate First Aid Steps

  1. Apply Direct Pressure: Use a clean cloth or sterile gauze to apply firm pressure to the wound to help control the bleeding.
  2. Elevate: Keep the head elevated to reduce blood flow to the area.
  3. Clean the Wound (if possible): If the bleeding is controlled, gently clean the wound with water. Avoid using strong disinfectants directly on the wound initially.
  4. Bandage: Cover the wound with a sterile dressing or bandage.

Seeking Medical Attention

  • Emergency Care: Seek emergency medical care immediately. Severe ear injuries often require professional medical treatment.
  • Possible Interventions: Medical professionals may need to suture the wound, administer antibiotics to prevent infection, and possibly perform reconstructive surgery if the damage is extensive.

Stopping Bleeding

If bleeding stops within seconds despite a significant portion of the ear being missing, it could indicate:

  • Natural Clotting: Rapid natural clotting response by the body.
  • External Pressure: Immediate and effective application of external pressure.
  • Vascular Damage: Damage to blood vessels might have caused them to constrict or collapse, temporarily reducing bleeding. However, this could be temporary, and medical evaluation is crucial.

In any case of severe ear injury with tissue loss, prompt medical evaluation and treatment are essential to manage the injury effectively and minimize complications.

It is unlikely that a wound to the upper earlobe that results in a chunk of the ear being lost would stop bleeding within mere seconds?

Yes, it is unlikely that a wound to the upper earlobe that results in a chunk of the ear being lost would stop bleeding within mere seconds without intervention. Here's why:

  1. Rich Blood Supply: The ear, including the earlobe, has a rich blood supply, and a significant wound is likely to bleed profusely.
  2. Nature of the Injury: A chunk of the ear missing indicates a more severe injury, which typically involves more tissue and blood vessel damage, leading to sustained bleeding.
  3. Normal Clotting Process: While the body can initiate clotting quickly, it usually takes several minutes for the process to effectively stop the bleeding in more substantial wounds.

Scenarios for Immediate Cessation

If bleeding stops within seconds, it could be due to:

  • Direct and Immediate Pressure: Applying immediate and effective pressure can sometimes rapidly reduce or stop bleeding.
  • Vascular Constriction: In rare cases, damaged blood vessels might constrict or collapse in a way that temporarily reduces bleeding.
  • Pre-existing Conditions: Certain medical conditions or medications might affect bleeding and clotting times.

Importance of Medical Evaluation

Even if bleeding appears to stop quickly, it is essential to seek medical attention for a wound of this severity. There can be underlying damage, risk of infection, and the need for proper wound care and possibly surgical intervention.

In summary, while it's possible for bleeding to reduce quickly under certain conditions, it is generally unlikely for a significant wound to stop bleeding within seconds without appropriate first aid.

3
Jacobin 3 points ago +3 / -0

Also weird how it stopped bleeding in a matter of seconds. In fact, we NEVER see any blood pouring at all. It just appears as is and never changes.

Would a bleeding ear coagulate so quickly?

3
Jacobin 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why did Trumps ear stop bleeding so quickly?

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Bible itself, including Jesus, already says enough offensive things about gentiles.

3
Jacobin 3 points ago +3 / -0

Grant Schapps, Dominic Raab and the Tugendhats of the outgoing Conservative Party are all Jews too.

Schapps was the Minister for Defence. Isaiah 60 says that Israel will inherit the forces of the gentiles (amongst other things). Case in point.

2
Jacobin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Aah, I had heard of that - just didn’t recognise it from its shortened name

3
Jacobin 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes. The documentary ‘Hypernormalisation’, whilst still propaganda and misleading in its own right, is nonetheless enlightening and speaks about Vladislav Surkov creating competing groups within Russian society and then letting it be known that they were Government created and controlled groups - all to bewilder so that Russians can no longer tell what is real and what is fake, what is organic and what is agents provocateurs etc. very interesting

3
Jacobin 3 points ago +3 / -0

No, be fair. It WAS Operation Trust. I tried to suggest to GAW that the hundreds of thousands of sealed indictments that they were so eagerly watching grow and were so eagerly anticipating being opened might prove to be people like them and NOT hordes of famous and influential people and other child traffickers.

Those indictments have still yet to be opened as far as my knowledge goes.

3
Jacobin 3 points ago +3 / -0

I get it. It left an indelible impression in real time and it’s the impression that you reminder fondly rather than the fact that you/we were being taken for fools.

I think tptb created the conspiracy purely in order to publicly deride it hard, thereby pushing legit conspiracy theorists evermore to the fringes in the eyes of normal society.

I think this plan is broadly laid out in Cass Sunsteins 2008 paper Conspiracy Theories: Their Causes and Cure.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›