No offense, but you think nuclear war is a good thing, and you can't even keep straight which of your dull questions you want me to answer. You don't exactly strike me as an intelligent person engaging in good-faith debate. Hopefully you're just a glowie and not actually as handicapped as you come across.
Oh look, another retarded question!
Your question changes each time you post. Do need me to explain why nuclear war is bad, why the destruction of all cities is bad, or why the destruction of "the current power that controls the world" is bad?
Because it's such a low-IQ question that I assume he (and perhaps you as well) either isn't intelligent enough to reach via the written word, or is just a glowie trying to make alternative thinking appear especially violent and stupid.
I'm guessing you're very young. I would encourage you to spend some more time thinking about your positions.
Hi. I simultaneously do not want nuclear war, and also do not want to take any vaccines.
Now you try
Yeah I don't think he's advocated for that.
I actually find this guy pretty interesting. He's extremely transparent about what he's doing. His goal is to reverse his age, but he makes zero claims about having accomplished this. Instead it basically amounts to really good free advice regarding diet and exercise.
I don't dislike Monero at all. Aside from Bitcoin Monero is the only non-retarded choice. That said, Monero is vastly less decentralized and always will be given the size of the Blockchain. I don't see either of your points as problems with Bitcoin.
No. This is retarded.
Am I the only one seeing absolutely no discernable pattern here?
Are there any there any recommendations for getting rid of it? Have had cats my whole life D:
I don't completely understand your translation. Should the "when" be translated as "until"? As the translation currently stands it could mean something like "If military action starts in Finland it will be too late to begin preparing."
Honest question; did Tucker push the vax?
Insurance companies get a bad rap, but compared with many other major industries their goals are actually pretty well aligned with those of their customers/ the public at large. For example, property insurance companies want better security, more sprinklers, earthquake resistant buildings, etc. Life insurance companies would obviously prefer that you live forever. I think something similar can be said for health insurance companies (preferring that you don't get sick), although the concept of health "insurance" is severely abused in US.
Also, the idea that "doctors care about you" is pretty laughable.
It doesn't seem to have the ability to reason logically. Asking it to prove various mathematical facts results in copy / pasted definitions followed by confident sounding claims that are often wildly incorrect.
Pretty sure that's exactly what they want you to think.
Monero has some cool features but will never be sufficiently decentralized as a result of the huge size of its Blockchain.
I think I'm totally with you in sentiment, but we disagree on the right approach. To the best of my understanding BTC appears to offer a glimmer of freedom from an insanely corrupt system. The interesting thing about the buzzwords surrounding BTC is that they seem to be true.
Imagine a future where you aren't forced to invest in corporations simply to save money. Imagine not needing to ask permission from your bank to withdraw your own money. Imagine being able to leave the US on a moment's notice with your entire net worth safely stored in your head.
Good luck.
Hahaha. Looking forward to swapping useless paper tokens with you for food and ammo in the post-electrical future.
I'm not going to waste time addressing your arguments. They're retarded and easily resolved with a few minutes of reading.
You've clearly done zero research into what Bitcoin is. I'm not going to spoon feed you arguments that are a Google search away. Just know that your arguments sound really dumb to anyone who's read even a little bit on the subject.
Paper cash will only be worth more "when the lights go out" (whatever that means) in the sense that one can use it for kindling. Totally agree that BTC is not a good currency in a post apocalyptic hellscape where there's no electricity. Really doubt that's where we're headed.
Yeah it was a question that crossed my mind as I was learning about BTC as well. Quantum-resistant cryptography is surprisingly not a new technology.
If quantum computing starts to look possible it would be straightforward for BTC to switch to cryptographic algorithms that are quantum-proof
OP's claims:
It's not clear to me that any of these ideas are logically connected.