Why can’t you answer the question or refute his position. Why do you want communists to continue to live. Why do you want natural law to continue to be violated.
Because it's such a low-IQ question that I assume he (and perhaps you as well) either isn't intelligent enough to reach via the written word, or is just a glowie trying to make alternative thinking appear especially violent and stupid.
But no, really, why is it bad that the current power that controls the world gets destroyed. I don’t know why you won’t say it’s good if they’re destroyed.
Your question changes each time you post. Do need me to explain why nuclear war is bad, why the destruction of all cities is bad, or why the destruction of "the current power that controls the world" is bad?
I'm guessing you're very young. I would encourage you to spend some more time thinking about your positions.
Why can’t you answer the question or refute his position. Why do you want communists to continue to live. Why do you want natural law to continue to be violated.
Because it's such a low-IQ question that I assume he (and perhaps you as well) either isn't intelligent enough to reach via the written word, or is just a glowie trying to make alternative thinking appear especially violent and stupid.
But no, really, why is it bad that the current power that controls the world gets destroyed. I don’t know why you won’t say it’s good if they’re destroyed.
Your question changes each time you post. Do need me to explain why nuclear war is bad, why the destruction of all cities is bad, or why the destruction of "the current power that controls the world" is bad?