2
Helloworld0 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, it is pretty weird that the Bible and modern society de-emphasize cowardice.

From this article: Revelation 21:8 reads,

“But as for the cowardly, the faithless, the detestable, as for murderers, the sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars, their portion will be in the lake that burns with fire and sulfur, which is the second death." Wow! Fear is as bad as killing?

2
Helloworld0 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've always had this thought in my mind that there are a certain number of people who have died because they didn't want to cross the street when they saw people that looked like criminals coming toward them on the sidewalk, because of the fear of appearing racist or judgmental.

This is probably true!! Great observation! Definitely makes me think. We should listen to our gut more, not propaganda

5
Helloworld0 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thank you for commenting. I hadn't thought of it exactly in that way; I was more disturbed about how parents sacrificed their children and made their lives hell because they were afraid to oppose the zeitgeist. Or they were afraid to lose their jobs (fear of uncertainty and risk) so they just took the jabs. Or they were afraid of people's opinion so they went along and became Karen's.

4
Helloworld0 4 points ago +4 / -0

Roosevelt and his wife were an interesting couple. He with his women. She being in love with a woman. They made great changes to society. He was crippled, the media wasn't great in those days so the public didn't know. The wife often made decisions for him. Like Biden and Jill. Or Charles abd Camila. I haven't looked into all the other presidents but Eisenhower knew stuff and was sketchy. I could see him being a Satanist.

2
Helloworld0 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep. I also think it is because we have become so self centered and don't believe in anything higher or more important than ourselves.

The doc I posted yesterday, with the husband looking for his wife.. he definitely had high T, good bone structure, he was willing to do anything even give up his organs for his wife and child. So sad.

1
Helloworld0 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am definitely not an expert on this topic - I think u/CrazyRussian u/Crazy_Russian would know more about the info on the ground.

Based on what you said, it is almost a combination of 2 different situations I am familiar with.

  1. a woman I knew suddenly, randomly left her home, job, country and went to Russia. Was around giant pyramid structures and stones a lot. When she spoke to her family, she could not tell them what was really going on, she found herself telling them everything was great. She was able to escape and return home but she has no memory of how, most of that time is deleted. But she found documents that her dad had arranged her to travel to Russia with one of the people there. She is from an occult and Mafia family.
  • possibly, your fb friend will have memory issues, if this is related, or else be unable to speak on certain things.
  1. In the documentary, the wife of the main bad guy was a young, beautiful white guy. She was pretty hard-core but stressed, regretted marrying him, and just wanted a normal life. But she got tons of gold and wealth from it.

Also, in the documentary, it appears that they often get a woman in the middle in order to better lure girls. So maybe they wanted your fb friend to fulfill that role. Sort of a Gislaine Maxwell situation.

  • is your fb friend in a different economic bracket now? Wearing interesting jewelry in any pics?

Is your fb friend back with the baby daddy? Maybe you can make a fake account and contact the person making the accusations about her and the baby daddy.

Might be better just to establish an emotional connection with her again. Like 'hey we haven't talked in a while, can you believe it is almost Christmas? How are you doing? The past couple years have gone by so quickly! I miss talking to you. No one else make me think/laugh/feel excited' Etc.

1
Helloworld0 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, be cosy and supportive. Don't ask direct questions.

You might want to refresh yourself on Robert Greene, and other Arts of Persuasion, how to make friends and infuence people, Bernays. Integrate that with your normal relationship with her. The stakes are high.

1
Helloworld0 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for the link. I am not convinced about the insectoid theory. People should look at the anatomy of insects.

3
Helloworld0 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wow, this is so Russian and pragmatic

You lost when you attracted their attention to you and your house. What is the problem to bribe them to avoid you? Or make a fake IDs that make you a perfect citizen in the eyes of state? Or hack a state database to make your house non-existent for authorities?

Russians should be teaching naive westerners the ways of the world. Such a different and interesting way of looking at things.

4
Helloworld0 4 points ago +4 / -0

Natural selection. The kid has Rod's genetics, is raised with his beliefs and probably occult stuff.

Mother Nature isn't kind.

2
Helloworld0 2 points ago +2 / -0

The saddest phrase.

"X was right"

3
Helloworld0 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good points! Also look into the Ages of the Bull, Lamb, Fish, and Waterbearer

2
Helloworld0 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe both cam be true. Separatist movements are increasing. But the WEF cohort is making its lockstep agenda more obvious.

Hopefully, entropy will win and stupidity will increase.

2
Helloworld0 2 points ago +2 / -0

I like Kunstler's blog. Often quality content :)

1
Helloworld0 1 point ago +1 / -0

Preachers are interesting. He has a good memory. 👍 At least he doesn't hate Mary like most NPC Protestants and Jewish Scripture.

1
Helloworld0 1 point ago +2 / -1

My mistake, the two Adversaries are:

The anthroposophical view is that good is found in the balance between two polar influences on world and human evolution.

These are often described through their mythological embodiments as spiritual adversaries which endeavour to tempt and corrupt humanity, Lucifer and his counterpart Ahriman. These have both positive and negative aspects.

Lucifer is the light spirit, which "plays on human pride and offers the delusion of divinity", but also motivates creativity and spirituality; Ahriman is the dark spirit that tempts human beings to "...deny [their] link with divinity and to live entirely on the material plane", but that also stimulates intellectuality and technology.

Both figures exert a negative effect on humanity when their influence becomes misplaced or one-sided, yet their influences are necessary for human freedom to unfold.

Chirst is the middle way.

1
Helloworld0 1 point ago +2 / -1

Connected to this focus on the human being, is the entire concept of Anthroposophy.

( I think, perhaps, one reason he was uninterested in educating the demonic humans was because he didn't think a Natural earthly spirit could truly study the human condition and human potential. Plus, he believed that animals, like a flock of birds, had a group mind, whereas humans were more individuated .... so the 'demonic' humans could be seen as NPCs. )

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthroposophy

Yes, the wiki bashes him as a racist, nazi, antisemitic and pseudoscientist. Even though he and Hitler had opposing philosophies.

But an interesting take away is the background and focus of study:

Ignaz Troxler used the term anthroposophy to refer to philosophy deepened to self-knowledge, which he suggested allows deeper knowledge of nature as well. He spoke of human nature as a mystical unity of God and world. Immanuel Hermann Fichte used the term anthroposophy to refer to "rigorous human self-knowledge," achievable through thorough comprehension of the human spirit and of the working of God in this spirit, in his 1856 work Anthropology: The Study of the Human Soul. In 1872, the philosopher of religion Gideon Spicker used the term anthroposophy to refer to self-knowledge that would unite God and world: "the true study of the human being is the human being, and philosophy's highest aim is self-knowledge, or Anthroposophy."

Steiner began using the term anthroposophy (i.e. human wisdom as the central point, not the green agenda of today ) as an alternative to the term theosophy (i.e. divine wisdom, with a focus on Eastern mysticism).

The study of human wisdom links the material world with the divine.

Anyway, in his belief, humans and animals both have the etheric spirit/energy but humans went to higher realms. They essentially have eternal life. Whereas the wholly Natural beings, with only an earthly etheric spirit would only have that one life in that particular way. They did not have a soul or eternal life in the manner of real human beings.

Hopefully some of this makes sense. It is a really different philosophy from how we would normally understand the world. And Steiner was a mystic dreamer type, difficult to understand.

I am not saying any of this is true or that I believe it, but his books and lectures can expand your mind, if you let it.

1
Helloworld0 1 point ago +2 / -1

Here is a bit about him, and the era he lived in, so as to better understand why he spoke that way. Steiner was a well respected and honored scholar before he started talking about spirituality. https://www.amazon.com/Rudolf-Steiner/e/B001H9XG9A/ref=aufs_dp_mata_mbl

Rudolf Steiner intentionally wrote in a difficult manner, so you will occasionally find yourself reading the same sentence several times in a row and contemplating it for quite a while, before you can understand its meaning. In contrast to the easily digestible online articles we read today, his books are designed to make you think not to make you browse.

First of all, I would recommend the "Philosophy of Freedom." This one is a challenging and very philosophical exercise of the mind. In it you will find an alternative explanation of what it means to be a human being in the world today. In it Rudolf Steiner conscientiously derives the idea, that man can evolve towards freedom. Modern philosophy is mainly based on relativism. There are no ultimate truths, and everyone is subjective to a degree that freedom seems to be impossible. This is the notion that people are merely guided by their instincts and self-interest. Interestingly, when Rudolf Steiner was writing the "Philosophy of Freedom" that was already the prevailing philosophy and essentially this is still the philosophical consesus we have today. That is why this book is so relevant.

Secondly, I would recommend "Goethe's Theory of Knowledge" since it contains much of Rudolf Steiners humanistic "weltanschauung", not only from the point of view of philosophy, but also science, art and psychology. - https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-best-books-to-get-in-touch-with-Rudolf-Steiner-ideas-and-philosophy

1
Helloworld0 1 point ago +2 / -1

There is the core esoteric philosophy (Steiner and the inner circle), and the schools such as Waldorf and Montessori are almost viewed as normies. They are the exoteric daughter circles. If they drift too far away from their original core esoteric, then the schools or organizations just become part of the crowd and lose the special spark. Either way, I'm not surprised the schools, which applied the philosophies were unaware of their full beliefs. Both are necessary.

Steiner had a lot of enemies, was a tortured figure, and was probably poisoned.

But, to counter the shills that popped up in this thread (not you, buddy), Steiner was actually quite bright and probably one of the world's experts on Goethe. Goethe was an important genius.

He wrote books on pretty much every topic - from agriculture, architecture, medicine, education, spirituality, etc.

In his view, there are two Adversaries, one a materialistic devil figure and the other a cold emotionless AI type figure, from what I recall.

If the children since the 1890s were noticeably appearing soulless, he and the woman are speculating about how/why it was happening. He thought that perhaps a walk-in spirit (not soul) is using the body as a puppet. Or perhaps not enough souls were incarnating so, for example, a tree energy spirit would go into a human shell. Or a former hornet. These would not have had countless human lifetimes to be... human. They still retain the 'hornet' or 'demon spirit' lack of empathy.

You could definitely be correct that we call them psychopaths. But it is interesting that they noticed the change around the 1890s.

2
Helloworld0 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fb people and others always have their camera covered.

2
Helloworld0 2 points ago +2 / -0

They also force you to continuously upgrade to the newest version of iPhone in order to be able to use various apps.

And they limit the apps you can use.

Anyway, this is one of the reasons it is standard practice for higher level govt workers to physically destroy their tech with hammers or whatever.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›