They hate Orthodox Church everywhere and constanly tries to replace it at least with Greek-Catolic church. It is where interests of Rome and globohomos are in great agreement. Rome, for whatever reasons, still dreams about taking Orthodox Church under pope rule, live in the delusion that it is possible, and ready to ally with anybody and anything for that.
Church Slavonic/Old Bulgarian/Ancient Russian is a same language. Modern Bulgarian language slightly closer to that ancient language than modern Russian. You still know how to pronounce letter "Ъ"! :)
Dostoyevsky made mistake about one thing - nihilism of the West. If the West was really nihilistic, we had never had all that problems with the West. West is obsessed with their supremacy, and truly and sincere believe things could be only in a way they understand. That is why they constantly try to push their "values" on us. This is not nihilism, but more like religion or cult. West uses nihilism as a weapon to break the will of other nations, but they are in no way nihilists themselves.
There was no "Roman power" in that areas. In the largest possible state of Roman Empire, it didn't really expanded further than south beach of Black Sea.
Roman Empire had too short hands for that regions, and never had any noticeable influence over them.
There was much more Greek cultural, linguistic, traditional, religious influence, not Roman.
The only trace of Roman Empire in that region could be Romania. At least, their language have Latin roots, but they are Orthodox Christians, and never was Catolics.
All that "tzar"/"caezar", "Moscow is a Third Rome, and there will never be Fourth one" and so on things have nothing to do with Roman Empire, it is all about Christianity, that in Orthodox tradition developed trough Ancient Rome (first Rome, lost its title after Catolic schism in 1054), Byzantium (Second Rome, lost its title after defeat from Ottoman Empire in 1453) and eventually Moscow took that title as an only Imperial ancestor of Orthodox Christianity.
This is still same dogmatism, quantum mechanic does not fit into general relativity - it is a problem of QM, and never GR. All that quantum field theory, quantum gravity and so on, are attempts to fit quantum world into general relativity, never vice versa. And ths is in situation when number of real, replicateable experiments that confirm quantum mechanics validity are orders of magnitude larger than very few observations (not even controlled experiments) that could be explained by general relativity. Fuck, we practically use quantum mechanics laws even when typing our messages on thins forum, but there is zero real practical applications of general relativity. But it is quantum mechanics should be changed, not general relativity.
Thinking about that, you also could notice that it is not quantum mechanics that put limitations on further technological progress. So, the barely proven theory dictates what things shouldn't be researched should be kept intact, while solid proven theory that doesn't limit our progress should be somehow changed to fit former one. Looks like it is limitations that relativity put on progress are very important for those who keep relativity as dogma.
Something like that.
Thank you for writing interesting things, that make this forum worth reading.
Goblins don't like when Slavic people unite very much, they definitely have some transcendent antipathy against us. :)
As for visiting Russia - better wait for spring, it is much nicer here when weather is warm and everything is green. Winter have it's charm, but you have to like it to be pleased. :)
We have kind of legend or myth that St. Andrew in his North tour reached Novgorod (Slovensk settlement at the time), but no artifacts or written evidences exists and Orthodox Christianity came back here only centures later.
I think Bulgarians lived there long before official foundation of state. People have to had a history of living in some place before official establishing of state or town, with exception of establishing a state in a colonial manner.
Моля извинете, I meant just current state of Bulgaria. Love this country and people, been there many times, on vacations and business trips.
Russia also had times with nothing to be proud of, shit happens, especially if you have millenias of history.
My country is half a century older than Russia
It could be even millenia older, taking in account things I saw in Nesebr f.e. It could be even as old, as Ancient Greece.
Unfotunately Bulgaria today is under globohomo occupation, just like it was under Ottoman occupation recently. Nothing to be proud of.
It's Bulgarian language on the screenshot.
“just build your own particle collider”
This is not as hard, as you think, really. :) If you for whatever reason need one, you could build it in your garage at weekend. Search for "fusor" or "star in a jar" in internet. It will easily collide ions of whatever gas you pump into it for you.
I’d also like to hear your scientific mind’s thoughts on the scientific observations (which do appear to “disprove” the notion that the universe as a whole conserves energy
This observations does not disprove anything about energy conservation, they disprove only exact modern official theory.
May be universe in whole conserve energy, may be not, but it is reasonable to use assumption that energy is always conserved in our practice. This is very helpful even for solving everyday problems.
We don't even know how antimatter interact with gravity, there was no single experiment set to study this question, we don't know if inertial mass is equal to gravitational mass, we don't know if a speed of light is really constant, but you want an answer to much bigger and further question about whole universe.
The problems you observe in modern science mostly are a result of abandoning a real scientific way, where every single theory statement should be proven in independent and replicateable way by real experiments. Today, mathematical masturbation almost replaced experimental research, so we hardly moved forward in studying world around us since 1970s.
Dark energy is peculiar because it's a deceitful epicycle attached to a failed theory to attempt to patch a hole in the theory.
Exactly. It does not even meant to be something real, it is just a dirty mathematical fix to make general relativity equations somehow correspond to real observations.
It is not a law, it is hypothesis for building theories. Ufortunately, in modern science this was limited to only one theory that put a severe constraints and limitations on any development of other theories.
Hypothesis of enregy conservation is perfectly valid, and there is no any problems with it. The problem is with modern single theory, that does not have place for any unknown energy conversions, so nobody study them.
Dark matter / dark energy is a crutch for modern theory invented in attempt to somehow fit experimental observations into the moderm theory that declared only correct one. It is just a mathematical "unknown" that mathematicians put on the one or another side of equation to make their equations look corresponding to observations.
General relativity equation turned from a theory into dogma, that is why everything observed had to be squizeed into this theory math at any cost, to not allow any doubts in dogma. "Eisnstein always right" regardless of what we observe in experiments.
So, energy conservation hypothesis just state that energy/matter can't appear from nowhere and disappear into nowhere. Einstein dogmas put hard constraints on the ways energy/matter could convert between different forms, so the only way to fit math with reality is to push inconsistency onto some "dark" thing, that just exist.
Throwing out Einstein dogmas we could easily imagine that there are just other energies / form of matter we didn't discovered yet and there are other undiscovered ways of conversion from known energy/matter forms to unknown forms. But since all research is directed only by Einshtein dogmas, there is no chance this possible ways and forms will ever be studied.
There are also mutiple other ways of how things could be in universe for real, from fractional dimentionalities, to just that constants declared as constants in modern theory are not really constants at all.
Energy conservation hypothesis is very useful for practical applications and nearly everything humanity invented is in one way or another use this hypothesis. So, I don't see any reasons to abandon it. And if energy/matter disappear into nothing or appear from nothing, I'll more likely suggest that we have to look for unknown forms of energy/matter, especially if there is no place for them in Einstein dogmas, than to fall into a trap of discarding perfectly working and practically useful energy conservation hypothesis.
But I don't think was about religion, it was about their Babylonian Magic money manipulation and their usury based banking.
It was both, and in addition also jews often tried accustom people around their settlement to drinking using poor quality alcohol, not even as a business but in order to eventually get hands on their property, something similar was attempted by them through Brits in China at much larger scale using opium.
And all that jewish behaviour have deep roots in their religion. Russian Empire at the time had many etnicities with different religions and different ways of life, but only those who practicise Judaism produced that many problems around.
Of course, Pale of Settlement wasn't best solution, but at least it noticeably delayed many negative processes that already happened inside many Western states.
Not directly. Of course Rothschilds are in it, but that's not as direct and straight as with Yukos, where Rothschild personally was a co-owner. IDK why he was so obsessed with personally owning part of Russian oil industry that he didn't use multiple proxies and investment funds as usual, but that allowed to punch him in his nose.
I mean direct destruction of Rothschilds family members, their personal property and all that stuff. Turning their personal life into hell. Some actions against some assets that owned through endless proxies hardly a big problem or challenge, I think Rothschilds acquire and lose such assets routinely, 24/7. Their personal property is completely another thing.
You approach to the question of religion from the very strange side, like it is some boring history book. But it is not. Religion is not just a sequence of some events, it is more like physics, but for spiritual world.
And no, history of Russian Orthodox Church is not some fairy tales, it is all perfectly documented through millenia, not only in written documents, but as towns and cities. Unlike some others, we keep our history through times. There was an attempt to erase it since 1917, but it was stopped around 1935, when Stalin finally took full power and almost exterminated Kaganovich when he tried to implement a plan that included destruction of Red Square and famous Church of Vasily Blessed. Unfortunately, Jews already destroyed Church of Christ the Saviour in 1931 as many other churches. But it was eventually restored.
That thing about second cheek, and love of enemy - you seem to be completely blind or have malicious intent, if you can't see that through all our history. This in no way mean unlimited obedience or endless restraint. This is a method to properly separate wheat from the chaff, good from bad, God's from Statan's. And it works perfectly for millenias.
Jews was weighted and separated from normal people two millenia ago. By Jesus, using the same things you try to use as a counter-argument. :) Nobody will ever turn a next cheek, the more so back to them. But they still have a chance to abandon Satan and deeply and sincerely repent for all their crimes, starting from killing God, and up to the last men they cheated with usury.
As I said earlier in this thread, I don't care who and when wrote "Zion Elders Protocols". Much more important that they correctly describe reality. Same with Jesus and Orthodox Christianity. I don't really care about all that "doubts" multiple antichristian shills bring. It works, and works good for me and my people for millenia. And no any "doubts" could change that.
May be it was the first time when property illegally stolen by Rothschild during USSR fall was confiscated back. Unfortunately, after kicking Rotschilds with their interests from Russia, no more agressive steps against Rothschilds family and their assets abroad was done.
They run from USSR at any occasion. ( From Russia too - last big exodus was in 2022 :) ) Those, who had enough brain and will to not do usual Jewish things and abandon Jewish tribal habits, lived normal lives without much problems.
Then some come back in 1991, but start to run away again when loud Yukos criminal cases started.
Just an interesting fact - in Russian Empire, USSR and Russian Federation, jailmates jargon is in significant part stay Yddish.
Nobody knew about any holohoax on the territory of USSR until the fall of USSR, when Western propaganda reached exUSSR countries. Holohoax was purely Western-made myth. That's one of the reasons USSR was (and is) so much hated by the Western elites.
That is why Jurgen Graf , who unveiled all that holohoax lies long ago, got asylum in Belarus, Russia and Iran until criminal cases against him for "thought crimes" expired in 2018, not in some "free" Western country. Meanwhile, Belarussians had the largest civilian losses ratio in WWII, from hands of Germans, including in labour camps, much larger than Jews. And still German Jurgen Graf found that it is safer in Belarus, than anywhere in the West. Graf died in 2025, in Switzerland from cancer. Who knows, may be he could be alive if still stayed in Russia after cases against him in Switzerland expired in 2018.
That is why all that communist jews who was able to flee USSR before, during and after WWII and then hijacked West still telling their tales about awful USSR, tyrant Stalin and all that stuff and still hate Russia much more than Germany.
Because USSR never accounted Jews in any way special, just one of many etnicities not different from any other and judged them by their deeds, not by their etnicity. That's one of the our greatest "crime" they will never forget, along with extermination of Khazarian Kaganate, acceptance of Christianity or Pale of Settlement.
Thank you.
IIRC Protestantism appeared as an attempt to return to the source from what Catolic Church created in Europe. However, later Orthodox Protestantism was heavily influenced, changed and divided into several different parts and unfortunately cease to exist as a single community.
In Orthodox Christianity, Christ is a leader of the church and parishioners connect with Him directly through eucharistia.
IMHO same should be valid for other churches where Christ is a leader of the church and proper eucharistia exist. Closer the church to origins, better connection to Christ through eucharistia, closer the connection to Christ's True Church.
I'm not a theologist, so it is better to talk with a priest about that matters. If you are curious enough - it is perfectly fine to find an Orthodox Church and just talk with a priest about such matters. You don't need to be Orthidox to have a good talk. Do the same with Protestant pastor if this is apropriate for your confession.
So, if you found it all to be real and believable, then what proof, evidence, or anything to substantiate it do you have? What proof do you have that God incarnated on earth and human sacrificed itself to itself to fix the problem that was its plan to begin with? What's believable about a virgin birth? What proof or evidence do you have that God actually said any of the stuff attributed to it within the Biblical texts? What proof do you have that those books teach God's truth?
You are trying to argue from wrong side.
Even in science everything is based on the set of axioms or hypothesis. Then, you take a look at results. If a theory based on some axiom/hypothesis gives results and predictions that are in good match with reality, and no resilts contradict theory, then you could be sure that you choose right, true set of axioms/hypothesis.
Symbol of Faith is a set of axioms. And church based on that set of axioms show best possible results. It survived unchanged for millenia, it guides our people through all shit imaginable and it effectively prevented the degradation of our souls. If this works, then our set of axioms is true.
If what you stated is true, that good things don't need marketing. Then the mere existence of Christian missionaries would prove Christianity is not a good thing. That Christians force converted the Roman empire in 380 CE shows that it's not a good thing.
You still mix Catolics with Orthodox. Konstantine followed church created by Pavel. Orthodox Church was created by Andrey.
It's obvious that the same person did not write/dictate all of them.
It does not matter. F.e. it is not known if "Zion Elders Protocola" are real or not, and who is true author. But it absolutely does not matter, because they correctly describe everything Jewish cabal do. I don't care who wrote "Zion Elders Protocols", I care about if they are useful and match reality.
In John 2:13-22, the story of Jesus cleansing the temple is put at the beginning of an alleged ministry. In the Synoptic Gospels, the event is put at the end of the ministry.
I don't see any problems here. End of one ministry could be a beginning of a new one. God tried to save Jews from degradation and turning to Satan, but they rejected God's help. So it was pretty logical to destroy specific Jewish-only ministry that does not work and establish a new one for all people of the world.
And so on. You are trying to attack wrong things, just like Jews are trying to prove that "Zion Elders Protocols" are wrong attacking author, but not the content.
I'm perfectly fine with inconsistencies in New Testament, because exactly that make it real. If you ask several people to describe one event they all witnessed, you will get different stories with some unsignificant contradictions. It is perfectly normal and usual thing for humans, because all humans are different. This is exactly how real story told by several people would look like.
On the opposite, when all witnesses tell exactly same story up to the tiny and insignificant details, this is always a clear evidence of conspiracy.
The texts of the OT are to be interpreted symbolically
Old Testament is a combination of some early world history recorded by not very educated people combined with the history of endless Jewish crimes. The latter was the reason of God's last attempt to save that damned tribe from themselves, that described in New Testament, and that ended in Jewish attempt to kill God himself, but eventually turned into a priceless gift to the all people of the world.
You have a strange, verbalistic approach to the thing that is complete opposite of verbalism. You pay all attention to the letters, completely ignoring the essence.
So would you agree that Orthodox Christianity is based on circular reasoning then?
There is no any circular reasoning. Everything is based on Symbol of Faith.
How do you know it's closer to the source, or that there even is a source, if you haven't proven the source to begin with?
There is ancient texts. Translations used by Orthodox Churches are closer to the originals than those used by other churches.
Do you believe all the claims in that symbol of faith are true?
Yes.
Do you even care?
Yes.
Sounds like you aren't a part of Orthodox Christianity because you actually believe the tenets it's based on are true, but rather because you don't have an alternative to believe in and Orthodox is the most convenient for you to function in society given you're Russian. Is that accurate for you?
There are no any churches closer to the origins of Christianity than Orthodox Church.
Functioning of society in Russia does not depend on the religion of citizens. We have at least 3 major religions here - Christianity, Islam and Buddhism. So no any pressure or whatever from society. My parents and even grandparents wasn't religious (as in routine visiting church prayers at home and all that stuff). I was baptised at the age of 10 when my mother proposed, mostly from curiosity and just in case (yes, it was in that "scary godless communist USSR" you know nothing about). It was interesting, inspirational and I had a great talk with priest (about Trinity, Universe, free will and even aliens). Then, studing science lead me to the conclusion than not everything in Universe could be explained by science, and using my childhood expirience and some research, I just found Orthodox Christianity a best possible thing to follow, because it give a clue to everything unexplainable in a most straight and consistent way. Also, studying Bible (in ancient Russian), Lives of Saints, I found that this all is real and believable, not some fake sweetened stories (or on the opposite, fear porn) as in other confessions. And no any marketing like all that churches that flood Russia after the fall of USSR. Good things don't need marketing, if you are not aware. Nobody knock into my door or pester me on the streets to lure me into Orthodox Cristianity, unlike all other confessions and sects.
So why do you believe the Orthodox church is some kind of True Church?
It is not a question of faith. Faith is in Symbol of Faith. Everything else is just consequences of that. Orthodox Church is True Church just because math. It is a least square estimate from all Christian religions. Closest to the source.
This stuff your symbol of faith?
Yes, that's all.
You champion reason, logic, critical thinking, and knowing in everything except the core stuff your religion is based on?
Yes, because religion is necessary for things that fundamentally can't be explained by science. From all religions I prefer Orthodox Christianity for this,
You have to appeal to blind faith because you cannot prove the central tenets of your religion.
If central tenets of religion could be proved and replicated independently, then it is not a religion, but science.
I have more practical approach to science. Any fundamental theory should open a multiple roads for technological progress, not close them. QM in that way is practical, verifiable, working and gives useful results. Einstein relativity only close roads without any practical application.
And no, GPS don't need relativity to work at all, those who try to use GPS as a single example of relativity usefulness, just never took a look into how GPS really works and unaware that it is differential system, not absolute one. It does not matter what absolute time is on satellites, the differences between times received from different satellites are used to calculate position. So, even if clocks run sligtly faster or slightly slower, this will give insignificant error (millimeters) in coordinates. Much more important thing is that all clocks on satellites should run with same rate, and this is solved using atomic clocks onboard.
So, from my point of view, QM wins over *R and it is *R that should be changed so that it will open multiple roads for practical technological progress.