It's about how computers really work. Starting another instance of existing software is not replication by any measure. Your computer do that routinely when needed, without any "AI" and apropriate hype.

Replication for case of LLM is when LLM will be able produce, as its output, new full LLM code and train it from scratch with own data, producing a real replica of a parent. Thing, that is completely different from what described in article.

So, "scientists" discovered that there exist fork() syscall?

Self-replication of programs is not a news since Morris worm.

Funny, that it is anglosaxon arrogance is a cause of the hell that currently happen.

May be it was a bad idea for Brits to baselessly imagine themselves a "Queen of Seas", borrowing money from Jews and all that idiocy?

It was so easy - just mind your business in your own countries, and don't play in Jewish games. But you rob that colonies, thinking in your arrogance that you will never pay the price, but reality does not have to align with your arrogant beliefs. :) Enjoy all that degenerates trashing your atomized nation.

Next time, when you will hear howling from the yet another mosque built in center of yet another city, thank your dumb rulers and your fellow compatriots who was glad to make wealth on stuff stolen from those, who now destroy your culture, traditions and everything you like.

Amaising. Arrogance is what killing your people, but you can't give it up.

You can't have a ethnic ressurection without ethnic unity. It's not aboust laws, its about everything. Atomized individuals have no any chance.

Nobody fear white anglosaxon men. White anglosaxon men become an example of arrogance, ignorance and cowardice.

White anglosaxon men should start with abandoning being absolute shabbesgoys for Jews, say goodbye to arrogance, educate itself at least a little and get some courage. Then, may be, white anglosaxon men will have a chance to gain some respect.

White anglosaxon men is not a center of universe. Just yet another etnicity bought into jewish bullshit of freedumb and demonocracy, willingly exchanging his future for instant comfort, stock gambling and feeling of self-importance.

Sorry, but your desperate and sincere propaganda just don't have ears to be heard anymore. Last time white anglosaxon men show some passionarity was US Revolution 250 years ago. And then, quickly sold all of it to the Jews.

It was unpleasant discovery for me almost two decades ago, when white anglosaxon friend from Montana told me in some trivial talk about nothing and booze, that he is afraid to build a distillator for making moonshine for himself because of laws and neighbours who will immidiately snitch on him. It could look insignificant, but that's a very bad and very clear sign for a nation. Obedience to the obviously stupid law and readiness to snitch on their own for that is an absolute no go for anything you want to call for.

To make your call at least heard, white anglosaxon men should start from the very beginning - began to be afraid to betray his neighbours and fellows more than of any stupid law. And that's not that easy to achieve in the current state of anglosaxons.

And calling to do anything in that state of etnicity will end bad for those of yours who still have some brain and courage. Any niggers or jews will easily defeat this lone warriors and things become only worse.

Mutual trust and support inside etnicity is what you need to restore first. I don't see that in anglosaxons at all. Celts (Irish, f.e.) , Greeks. Italians - they losing it, but still have. It is imaginable that one Irish man in trouble could meet another Irish man, f.e. abroad, and say, "I'm Irish, you Irish too, help me, buddy". Not that latter somehow obliged to help, but they feel some ethnic unity. But with anglosaxons it is unimaginable situation. Anglosaxons lost it completely long ago. IDK why, but thats it.

Unfortunately, those rich lists like Forbes are compiled from public lists of legal stock ownership

What about land ownership registers or whatever other sources? Forbes is MSM and can't be accounted as reliable source for obvious reasons.

people like cartel leaders where there aren't legal records of their wealth.

I don't think cartel leaders anywhere near even with hired personnel like corporations CEO's. Cartels absolutely can't exist without assistance of three-letter agencies and border guards that cost much more than anything cartels ever saw in their lives. It is not their money, it is a money of those who control three-letter agencies. Those who lobbying one or another three-letter agency head get most drug money, cartels are just their workforce.

Geiger counters are cheap and easy-to-buy things today. This will work much worse than coronahoax, because those who have brains will have undeniable, easily checked by anybody proof of no any rised radiation levels.

Radiation is not "invisible" today, and it can't be emulated by fraudlent PCR tests that could be sourced only from BigPharma and can't be checked by users.

Make a list of most rich ones, you will not be far from what you want. I mean really rich, in personal wealth. not some CEOs who just juggle someone else money.

Do you really believe this horseshit?

That's what my buddies from European countries told me. No, they are not even like us on that forum, just regular people with hands from right place and decent brains. And even they become to suspect that something going wrong, only during coronahoax. May be only few do that earlier, noticing growing inflow of immigrants with incomatible cultures.

As if "Europeans" is an entity of its own that gets to make such plans or the common European suddenly woke up and decided he doesn't like mining resources anymore.

Most Europeans are under the severe brainwashing propaganda, telling them that EU is an Edem on Earth and all they need to do is to sit under the trees in this wonderful garden and get free fruits. European elites literally pay them to abandon any productive activity, may be you heard about European farmers who was offered payments for abandoning farming. Thing you probably didn't know is that many agreed. European tax system is forcing people to decline higher salaries, because due to nonlinear progressive tax they will ger less money they get with lower salary. This happen even with my European buddies personally. And all that small things introduced by authorities, designed to turn Europeans into a World's welfarers mostly accepted without any questioning.

European elites infect Europeans with arrogance at astonishing pace.

Things are better in Eastern Europe, may be because of critical thinking vaccination during Soviet period, may be because better education during that period, may be both. But even there things are the same, just the rate is lower due to higher resistance.

Most interesting difference is between West and East Germany. I think you heard something about that.

Separate thing is Baltic states. Lithuania is still somehow going, they have some agricultural industry, but other two - Latvia and Estonia turned into complete void. No industry, no agriculture, nothing. Just living on EU welfare.

All in all, only some Eastern Europe countries have a chance to avoid such destiny.

Europe is in reality a vasal territory of the Anglo-American establishment.

Yes, but the problem is that most Europeans don't see that and worse - don't want to see that. Things revealed at the time of coronahoax didn't stop, they are progressing further.

If people are willingly marching into abyss, and don't want to listen anything, then let them.

Something similar in methods was done to Ukrainians, but it started earlier, in 1991. EU brainwashing started later, approx in early 2000. So, in the best case Europeans have only 10 years to the complete zombification, but many are already zombies, who could not be turned into humans back anymore.

I thought people here know the rule of thumb that major changes in the economy, culture and society like this don't happen randomly but are engineered from above, even if one isn't familiar with the particular agenda behind the events.

At least, anyone could just ignore that changes. But unfortunately, Europeans widely accepted them. All that LGBTXYZ+ crap, "climate change" and so on. Nobody actually forced Europeans to buy EV cars (and no, gas/diesel prices was not really prohibiting), they do that voluntary, believing in "climate change" narrative and selling themselves for insignificant tax deductions, imaginary economy on fuel and virtue signalling. I know people who still riding 1990s cars in Europe and they are far from bankruptcy, not being millionaries. It was really easy to just ignore all that brainwashing, in the beginning but they didn't.

Interesting, we in Russia walk through economic disaster much more severe than anything ever happened in any Western European country. Even Greece economic problems looks like nice breeze in comparison. Fuel prices doubled in a week, but that didn't make anybody to turn down on owning a car and choose public transport. 24/7 MSM propaganda of liberal values at the time didn't make us tolerant to faggots. And so on. So, economy and state propaganda is not the real reason. When population don't give a fuck, nothing will work.

There is also a huge problem behind all this nobody talk about. Let's imagine that somehow last sane Europeans won and got rid of globohomo ZOG. And get a county where majority are zombies. There is no way you could somehow revive them. Recall your attempts to talk about coronahoax with, say, neighbour who bought into that crap. That's it. That zombies will not change their minds and become useful just because good people took over. To the any attempt to dezombify them, they will scream, demand their welfare, attack you with intention to actually kill you. How to deal with all that zombie crowd? Assuming those who took over globohomos are good people, killing zombies is not an option. In the end they are still people, even former ones, living beings. Feed them for nothing will be too expensive. Keep all that useless jobs they used to will multiply any efforts to restore country by zero. And so on. I have no any good solution, even don't know where to start, and barely anybody know too. The "best" I could imagine is to allow that society of zombies to collapse. So, here we are.

Agree. This is a weird thing with all ancient images of celestial phenomenas.

Take a notice, how thoroughly this idiotic human face on the image of Sun (or Moon, or both on other pictures) is pictured. So, artist is definitely skilled enough to draw details. But everything really importnat is pictured at infant level, suddenly.

And no, it is not some "artist can't draw a thing he didn't know". It is a bullshit. If you show some complex device completely unknown for a decent artist or even to a child with minimum drawing skills, who could draw a human face recognisingly, he will have no any problems to draw that unknown device with proper details.

I even did an experiment on that matter with my young niece who have some talent for drawing when I met with that phenomena. I asked her to draw by memory a recently overhauled car alternator I had in garage. It was pictured perfectly even with some details I never actually noticed, like a contour of a place where lost label with partnumber and stuff was glued. She didn't know what it is and never really draw anything technical, apart from garden tools or cars.

Either an artist wasn't a witness of phenomena and draw a picture from a very bad textual description, either this is a hoax.

The problem is that ALL such pictures drawn that way. It is improbable that from hundreds of such pictures none of artists was a witness and ALL of them pictured only from poor textual description.

It is Europeans make themselves poor.

Europe is as rich with resources as Russia or Canada. Actually they don't need to buy anything abroad, they could mine everything they need just from under their feet.

Fuel: Enormous reserves of coal under Poland, Germany Britain and France. Oil is under the european shelf, under Scandinavia Britain, Ireland, Iceland and Nothern Spain. Natural gas under the Midterranian sea beach. Uranium could be mined right near Paris without much problems. It's not even very deep there. There is enough uranium near Paris to fuel all European nuclear plants for centuries.

Metal ore: Everywhere. European soil is reach with iron. Copper is in Italy, Greece and Cyprus. (Cyprus mean Copper in ancient Greek).

So called "rare-earths": Midterranian beach is full of rare-earths. Scandinavia too. Fuck, nearly half of all rare-earths named after European locations:

• Europium: Obviusly named after Europe itself
• Terbium: Named after the Swedish town of Ytterby
• Holmium: Latin 'holmia' for the old name of Stockholm.
• Erbium: Named after the Swedish town of Ytterby (again)
• Thulium: Named after the old name of Scandinavia, 'Thule'
• Ytterbum: Named after the Swedish town of Ytterby (once again)
• Lutetium: Named after the Roman name 'Lutetia' for Paris.
• Yttrium: Named after the small town of Ytterby (are they kidding me?)
• Scandium: Named because it was found in Scandinavia.

And so on.

Europeans become too lazy and arrogant to even think about mining absolutely everything they need for their industry and wealth by themselves. They think somebody should provide them all that stuff for their colored paper and they will teach everybody around about how to live and what to think.

So fuck them. They live on the reach reserves and don't bother to dig them out.

It is like to live near a lake full of fish surrounded by the forest full of game and all kind of berries and mashrooms, along with endless wood for building and fire, and constantly whine about severe starvation, cold, homelessnes being too lazy to make a fishing rod, bow and axe - they are their own enemies and fully deserve everything what will happen with them.

If Europeans prefer to have a ski resort in Alps instead of rare-earth mine, overpriced Paris suburbs instead of Uranium factory or luxury realty in Nice instead of Lithium quarry - then let them source all what their industry need from sole existence of this luxury properties. Fuck this arrogant beggars.

In the worst case, it would be wrapped into some narrative, say, something like "Greenland is a colony, Denmark reject its colonial past and allow inhabitants to choose own way, unlike all that totalitarians and dictators everybody don't like".

USA government and MIC needs NATO much more than Europe. EU already trying to create some EU own military structures, and somehow ressurect own MIC. USA on the opposite, will prefer complete destruction of EU manufacturing to sell more weapons.

Notice that USA MIC will sell weapons to Europe for USD. USD market shrinked significantly, and USA elites need some replacement for petrodollar scam to continue to export inflation. They urgently need somebody who will value USD for something, in case of NATO it is weapons.

Since NATO is a purely commercial organsation built to sell US weapons and license US military standards to Europe, I highly doubt US will ever abandon NATO in any way. Without NATO nobody need overpriced and inferior US MIC production.

On the opposite, it is probable that now US will force other NATO members to significantly rise weapons and license purchases.

There was numerous airforce clashes (real, with shooting and may be even with shot down planes) between Turkey and Greece, both NATO countries. Nothing happened, it was just sweeped under the rug, and nobody in Europe allowed to talk about that at the time.

Technocracy without meritocracy inevitably turn into idiocracy. I don't see even slightest signs of trying to implement meritocracy anywhere in the world, not even talking about West where kakistocracy (the direct opposite of meritocracy) established in full force.

So, you are talking about idiocracy, not technocracy, and yes, USA government is second to none in establishing world idiocracy order.

Trump needs a distraction from his plan with Venezuelan oil.

Not my fucking business, really, but from outside it looks more like Trump needs a distraction from the question of Epstein files and names of his masters in them.

Exactly my point, you're stuck in the physicist's trap.

And to "untrap" I, obviously have to believe in some unproven and poorly written garbage.

No, thank you. I don't need that unscientific shit to know that modern cellphone infrastructure, including social media is harmful for people. I don't need to refer to some authority to understand the harm and how exactly, and by whom it is done to the people.

You demand something that isn't required to show harm

Harm of what exactly? How do you know it is RF, if no any RF parameters measured and even RF presence is not proven?

There are some proposed underlying mechanisms, but it's not yet clear.

So no proof that such mechanisms exist. Case closed.

If a scientist don't care about what is really happens in his experiment, then he is not a scientist.

However the harm is still clear regardless.

Even if we don't take into account that none of studies you believe in was independently replicated, you still don't want to know harm of what exactly was studied. Just like that "scientists" who published their papers.

Interesting, that you are obviously trying not to convince me that phones are harmful, because I already know that, and seems that I know much more about that than you, but to convince me to believe in some papers written by some ignorant people who actually don't know shit about things they write about.

Do you understand that you are trying to do exactly same harm, corporations and authorities do using phones? Force people to blindly believe in some narrative, referring to some "experts". Looks like you are on the same side. It does not matter what narrative is pushed, the main thing is to break critical thinking and force subject to blindly believe some "authority".

Again, effects of what you are talking about? Authors didn't provide any sensible information that could be used to figure out what exactly they studied.

Sorry but that is pure and simple denial.

Yes, I deny garbage. This paper is a garbage and I carefully pointed out why exactly.

The engineer or physicist writes off all biological effects

There is no such separate and special thing as "biological effects". Biology works on the same physical principles as all other things in the world. It is in no way special.

If you want to introduce some additional effect or principle, in addition to physical one, in biology or medicine, then you have to describe its exact mechanism on the lowest possible level and prove it on this level, prove it with a simple, replicateable and clean experiment, that EM wave of RF could interact with a matter in some new, unknown way. And only then, you will be able to bring some ground for your baseless statement about "biological effects".

Without that, any "study" you could bring will be nothing more than bullshit. Not any different from a study about "we give a drink to one group from a random puddle, and other group from a tap and get different results" without providing full chemical analysis of water from puddle and from tap and describing exact mechanisms that gave results observed. That's not a science, it is a mockery of science and sanity. "Study" you brought here is nothing more than senseless torture of mice for the sake of getting publication score.

You don't get to dismiss the 100 studies reviewed

I do. Review is not a replication. Review is not a discovery of a new way of RF interaction with a matter.

And it is a pattern already, when scientists fall to writing reviews of multiple studies, then it is a clear sign that they know shit about things they review.

It is not a coincidence that biology and medicine are infamous for a very high rate of "review studies", much higher than in all other areas together. You will not find "review studies" in optics or reology. You will not find "review studies" in thermodynamics or chemistry. Because there are no any need for them.

Also, "review studies" is known for dismissing all studies that does not fit reviewer point. So, I wouldn't be amased at all, if there is another 100 studies (probably of same garbage quality as 100 reviewed) that show complete opposite results.

You don't get to invoke some grand conspiracy among researchers (paid for by no one) to deny all the findings.

There is no any findings. And the worst thing is that they don't need them. Current, completely broken state of biology and medicine is perfectly fine for making careers and acquiring funding, so nothing will change in observable future.

And then, people like you, pointing to that garbage, proclaim "its science!", just like that Fauci bastard, without even understanding how real science looks like. And no, publication in scientific journal does not make science from garbage.

But the same effects are shown over and over again.

But somehow new, undiscovered way of RF interaction with a matter didn't pop up yet . If you think it is normal, then I have a bridge to sell you.

However, your objections tend to favor the effects being DOWNPLAYED not OVERSTATED

To talk about some effects, you have to properly describe effects of what exactly you are talking about.

This description is completely absent, because "800-1900MHz with SAR from FCC certificate" is not a description at all. It is a "magic spell" copied from FCC certification paper without any understanding of its meaning.

This is the thing that makes this whole article a complete bullshit and with high probability just yet another fake, as many articles in biology and medicine are.

Interesting, how many articles from same Nature about coronahoax you accept as facts? I hope zero. Then why do you think this article is somehow different? Just because it support a narrative you like? But it is still a narrative, and it is still a fraudlent article for the sake of publishing article.

Science is not about things you like.

"Only heat, only heat" That is a pure denialist industry line, and not surprising from someone who gets visibly upset when presented with facts about low intensity microwave studies.

There is no single study about any other effects that is written scientifically and replicated.

"Facts" you see in all that stidies is no any different from "facts" from coronahoax studies, published in same journals.

Unfortunately, today 95% of biochemistry/medical studies are unreplicateable garbage or just fraudlent. There is absolutely no sense to blindly believe any without heavy critical analisys. And if any inconsistency is found, study should be discarded.

So I sure as hell wouldn't want to be subjected to a medical therapy 24/7 for something meant to be 10-15 minutes for a limited number of sessions

UHF therapy device have around 30-300W of power with directed antennas. 10-15 minutes of UHF therapy a day is much more energy than whole day with actively transmitting phone.

contraindications (including pregnancy, which relates to that rat study).

It is not wise to heat a fetuse in a womb. Regardless of a method.

Remember, chemotherapy is a therapy, but it's also a poison. It has it's place, and that place is few and far between, not forced onto the public.

This is not a reason to run around and yell bullshit about f.e. "There is awful poisonous aluminium oxide found in <whatever food>!!!".

There is real and obvious harm of cellular phones and smartphones for people. They are used by corporations and authorities for surveillance and control of population. Isn't that enough to make a good, honest and undeniable anti-modern-mobile propaganda? But instead of fighting or mitigating this real harm, I see tons of bullshit "studies", memes, posts and other fearmongering in all areas except the main and only real one.

This is insanity.

Instead of trying to scare audience with yet another bullshit, why don't you try to write a post that explain how any phone with OS and software from Apple, Google and other shitty corporations constantly steal and sell user private data, even private data of user contacts, user time (through ugly and idiotic interface), and whole user life spent in stupid applications? It is much more harmful for human brain and life than any possible tiny heating of human body surface layers with a very moderate RF power.

First you posted a paragraph and told me to "guess" rather than being able to show anything.

That's the point. If such paragraph in scientific paper looks perfectly normal for somebody, then, it says a lot about level of understanding how things really works.

That doesn't make much sense, no such thing as an active call on a "silenced" phone, so I have no idea what you're saying there.

Yes. Because you have absolutely no any idea about how cellphone works. Just like those who wrote this paper. Mobile phone is a magic for you and article authors. But there is no place for magic in scientific paper.

What could possibly be your problem with that band?

It's not my problem. It is a huge problem for article authors.

The penetration depth of RF into any conductive matter (all living beings are made from conductive material, if you are not aware) depends on frequency and resistivity. For real scientist it is important to show that phenomena they study, RF radiation, in this case, actually reach an object of study, mouse brain, in that case. And EM wave penetration depth heavily depends on frequency and resistivity of object and its surrounding. But authors just throw a "band", not even attempting to show that RF wave they study, will be able to reach mouse fetuse brain at a decent level to make their experimet have some sense. :) It is not a science - it is garbage.

No exact frequency, no any measurements of power actually emitted by phone if any, no phone model, no mention of cellular network standard generation used, no prove that their "active" phones differ from "deactivated" ones, no prove that phone RF, if any, actually reach object of study.

Depending on the network standard generation actually used for a call, phone baseband IC, firmware and so on, phone could tramsmit almost nothing, if there is no audio signal coming from its microphone, to save battery. Even with GSM, phone may transmit something only if there is data to transmit. If there is nothing to transmit, only small and rare service packets will be transmitted, lowering average transmitting power by hundreds if not thousands times.

Power of transmission for CDMA/3G (available at the time of article) heavily depends of the distance to the cellular base station and conditions of reception. If phone is close to base station, it will transmit at power level orders of magnitude less than if it is far from base station. It is a huge difference, when you have 1W peak transmission and 10mW peak transmission.

Nothing of above was taken into account by article authors, and this undoubtedly move this article to the area of bullshit.

There are many other flaws, from non-blind objects selection for final behaviour study to drawing questionable ADHD thing to the article. Authors even managed to put obvious bullshit into article, that probably was noticed by those who tried to take it seriously, so authors had to add corrigendum:

The authors identified an error in the determination of the maternal corticosterone levels as presented in Figure 4. The ELISA was repeated using stored serum samples from the original experiment. The levels have been corrected and are shown below in Figure 1 (the revised Figure 4). The mean corticosterone level in the pregnant control females was 5.4 ng/ml and in the exposed female mice was 6.1 ng/ml. There was no significant difference between the corticosterone levels of the control and experimental groups.

So, taking in account all of above, guess a probability that other data in the study is erroneous too.

The truth is that for completely unknown reason, life on planet Earth have a very strong protection from EM waves. This protection have no any obvious explanation, because it is able to protect living beings from tens and even hundreds of orders of magnitude stronger EM waves than any EM waves ever appeared on Earth naturally.

And even if this heavy protection is penetrated, the effect of EM waves interaction with living being organs is heat. This is used for more than a century for targeted medical heat treatment of internal organs, but used frequences are significantly lower than fraquencies used in cellular networks with power many times larger than power of cellphone transmitters, to allow EM waves to reach internal organs surrounded by conductive environment and heat them.

Unlike all that fearmongering about cellular phones, UHF therapy is well established medical treatment since at least 1950s and used routinely in treatment of many diseases.

Frequencies used in cellular network at power levels used are unable to reach inside human. It is like a cutlet in a microwave oven where 600-800W of 2.4GHz concentrated at the cutlet, but you still get cold middle with hot surface. Worst thing cellular network frequencies cold do to living being is a surface burn, and only if a power on the surface will be rised to few kW per square meter.

People get dumber because of modern social media content, and unwilingness to become smarter, not because of phones.

Shouldn't you just say?

Do you understand how modern smartphones work? There is no single really important detail provided in the description of differences between test and control phones. Not a single one.

Seriously, what do you know about how mobile phones work?

Basically, depending on used standard (2G/3G/4G at the time of study), phone model, direction of a call, method of "deactivating" phone and so on, there will be no any significant differences between "uninterrupted active call" on "silenced" phone and "deactivated phone".

And that 800-1900MHz band... :)

It is like a "study" about "influence of color on the behaviour of fleas" with zero information about color except that it was "popular".

That's really what matters.

Matters in what exactly? They didn't provide any real data about differences in setup between test and control groups. Their experiment is fundamentally unreproduceable.

And reproduceability is the only thing that matters in science.

often associated with ADHD

does not mean ADHD.

So link to ADHD is not proven.

It turns out these scientists were not retarded

Looks like they are even more retarded than I thought.

Full quote from article:

Thirty-three female mice were exposed throughout gestation (days 1–17) to radiation from muted and silenced 800–1900 Mhz cellular phones with a SAR of 1.6 W/kg. The phones were positioned above each cage over the feeding bottle area at a distance of 4.5–22.3 cm from each mouse, depending on the location of the animal within the cage, and placed on an uninterrupted active call for the duration of the trial. A control group of forty-two female mice was kept concurrently under the same conditions, however using a deactivated phone.

Guess, what's wrong in that description.

Interesting, looks like that ADHD thing exists only in Western countries. Just like autism, anxiety and other weird stuff.

Is there any solid, replicateable proofs that ADHD as a mental disease exist at all? All descriptions of ADHD I could found points to the murky situation that appears to me like child won in competition with parents for who is boss here, and who deserve all attention. Of course such children will be dumber, because parents will not force them to study. Absolutely nothing good cuff or clip on the butt could not resolve.

From the other side, if you read a definition and sympthoms attributed to ADHD, and invert them to get what those who talk about ADHD assume as healthy child without ADHD, then you will get a description of a vegetable or robot without own will. A person that does not show any unauthorized activity, never demand attention from his bosses, always thoroughly listen what bosses tell and obey anything. It is insane! If that's how those "psychiatrists" see "healthy" children, then it is time to get rid of "psychiatrists" from society, or they will destroy it.

Children should do crazy stuff, they should demand attention and should be restless source of all things that we love them for.

Back to article - how ADHD in rats was detected exactly? There is no single word about it in article.

Why all effects of basically just more cautious mice are attributed to cellphone radiation, not just to prescence of object above cage during pregnancy of their mothers? Mice have tons of enemies in nature, and all of them attack from above. It is pure instinct for mice to be afraid of objects above. So I see nothing strange that if pregnants mice is in constant stress from weird thing constantly hanging above their heads, their offspring could grow more cautious.

If you force a pregnant woman to live for months under a giant anvil hanging on a rope above her head, I doublt she will bring a healthy and calm child.

So, here we have yet another attempt to pass some bullshit unreplicated article as a science. No, guys, it is not a science at all. It is bullshit.

Especially funny, that taking in account what ADHD mean and believing this article, people at least here should conclude that cellphones radiation is a very good thing that helps humans not to turn into vegetables, those who invented ADHD want to make from us and our children. :)

PS: Why I'm certain for 100%, that those who talk about ADHD as a mental disorder, will never name, say, homosexuality a mental disorder, not even talking about naming it mental disease? :)

I have more practical approach to science. Any fundamental theory should open a multiple roads for technological progress, not close them. QM in that way is practical, verifiable, working and gives useful results. Einstein relativity only close roads without any practical application.

And no, GPS don't need relativity to work at all, those who try to use GPS as a single example of relativity usefulness, just never took a look into how GPS really works and unaware that it is differential system, not absolute one. It does not matter what absolute time is on satellites, the differences between times received from different satellites are used to calculate position. So, even if clocks run sligtly faster or slightly slower, this will give insignificant error (millimeters) in coordinates. Much more important thing is that all clocks on satellites should run with same rate, and this is solved using atomic clocks onboard that work on QM princiles (sic!).

So, from my point of view, QM wins over *R and it is *R that should be changed so that it will open multiple roads for practical technological progress.

They hate Orthodox Church everywhere and constanly tries to replace it at least with Greek-Catolic church. It is where interests of Rome and globohomos are in great agreement. Rome, for whatever reasons, still dreams about taking Orthodox Church under pope rule, live in the delusion that it is possible, and ready to ally with anybody and anything for that.

Church Slavonic/Old Bulgarian/Ancient Russian is a same language. Modern Bulgarian language slightly closer to that ancient language than modern Russian. You still know how to pronounce letter "Ъ"! :)

Dostoyevsky made mistake about one thing - nihilism of the West. If the West was really nihilistic, we had never had all that problems with the West. West is obsessed with their supremacy, and truly and sincere believe things could be only in a way they understand. That is why they constantly try to push their "values" on us. This is not nihilism, but more like religion or cult. West uses nihilism as a weapon to break the will of other nations, but they are in no way nihilists themselves.