3
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

Catastrophism? You mean like cyclical catastrophes which align with the precession of the equinoxes? Like we have a mountain of evidence for? Or do you mean something far gayer and more jewish?

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wikipedia was linked to as catalogued evidence of multiple 200+ ton stone megaliths moved into position from their quarry site and nothing more.

Regarding your ideas about lack of out-of-place/“out-of-time” technological artifacts, you seem both woefully uninformed:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antikythera_mechanism

And woefully unimaginative:

https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARKEOOd4S/a-scientific-analysis-of-chi-and/c

Which is a sad shift from how I normally see your comments.

0
Graphenium 0 points ago +1 / -1

You “respectfully” (read: faggily) declined to review the evidence, don’t you remember? It was only a couple hours ago

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

Only one of the pictures has anything providing any kind of size reference

Anyway, here’s the wiki page. Megaliths weighing (up to) many hundreds of tons moved into position:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_monoliths#Moved_monoliths

And no, log rollers or log pivots to move massive stones don’t work in desert sand lol, though I did enjoy that comment when I first saw it, I don’t believe it applies.

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

No, I want to hear some kind of proposed mechanism and evidence of observation, otherwise “CDK” is nothing more than “dark energy” which you cry about elsewhere

4
Graphenium 4 points ago +4 / -0

>Mfw you can “roll” 200 ton stones through fucking sand, then lift them into positions so precise you couldn’t fit a razor blade between them (u triggered?)

Lmao

I know how comforting “just so” stories are. Doesn’t stop them from being retarded however.

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

That’s great. I wasn’t suggesting your post be removed (is that not obvious?) just that you get some better evidence than “a bunch of retards agree with me”

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +4 / -1

The community mods are all MiA, the admins have been notified and their help has been requested but they’ve just been jerking off and ignoring us for a few weeks now

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +4 / -1

you believe humans coexisted with dinosaurs, yet there's no evidence of this anywhere.

Well, except for every culture on earth talking about dragons

🚨 RETARD ALERT 🚨

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +4 / -1

Inb4 “achsully the speed of light is changing. Don’t ask me for the how, or the why, just shut up and worship zionism”

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

grinding in stones inplace … No any advanced technologies needed.

How did they place these 200 ton stones? They have no plausible means of moving them, much less lifting them precisely into place

4
Graphenium 4 points ago +7 / -3

Maybe, but “the Bible” and “6 gorillion jews agree with me” aren’t proof

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +4 / -1

Wrong. I was the second downvote, and only because you said I was the first, fag

5
Graphenium 5 points ago +6 / -1

Beginning with disingenuous arguments and the logical fallacy of “prove me wrong” increases the likelihood that your side has nothing. YW.

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

Try this perspective...how many choices (plural) can a being (singular) shape until the singular becomes plural?

Hmm…none (i.e. it’s not possible?)

One (i.e. the choice to pair with a mate and produce offspring?)

Many/Infinite (i.e. similar to above, but the ongoing series of choices made from inception to death?)


Why does plurality imply a synthesis? Because everything naturally exists as “one”?

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

Khufu's pyramid

Look into it some more, the entire justification for attributing the Pyramid to Khufu is a single stone stele that reads more like a shopping list for repairs carried out under his reign than any kind of building dedication. I’d start here:

https://vimeo.com/521974505

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

But you don't like what I say

Yeah. Because inevitably it’s 10 fucking paragraphs about irrelevant shit closed out with some snide insult or passive aggressive faggotry from an unearned high-horse

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

You never actually dive into the stuff I share and invite you to dive into. You’ve never shared your thoughts on the Gospel of Thomas despite multiple occasions and invitations, nor the Tao Te Ching, nor John Chang and Mo Pai, nor gTummo yoga, nor any of the “prehistory” stuff I’ve shared (including this). If you do ever comment, it’s usually gay and passive aggressive like these last two, and never about the substance of the post. Only retards are convinced the earth is 6,000 years old - why would I design my posts around retards?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›