Definitely true that the axis “Boomer vs. Zoomer” is being used to divide us all, though it’s not for the overly simplified reason stated in the post, but instead it’s just one of MANY axes being used to divide (and conquer) us. Just like Man vs Woman, “conservative” vs “progressive”, etc etc
In a sense, the post is right, this is being done to silo and isolate groups and prevent them from sharing information and goals. Just important to note the similar things being done on basically every “front” or potential axis of division.
“Boomer vs. Zoomer” is being used to divide us all
Versus/verto - "to turn" implies turning against one another aka together aka united in conflict. It's the state of each one within all, which implies division from one another.
If one chooses any side, then one turns against the other.
To be more specific...turning implies within a cycle; being (life) implies within delineation (inception towards death). To invert natural delineation; few shape artificial cycles inside (logic) and outside (reason) of many.
What's another word for instruction? https://www.etymonline.com/word/Talmud Notice furthermore that a mason calls it a cyclopedia...cause a free-mason ain't in (en) it.
simplified reason
Reasoning implies complex vs complex to reach simplicity...
one of MANY axes being used to divide (and conquer) us.
Axe implies "to split; divide"...many implies unification of one with one another, while ignoring that being one implies division from one another.
The label "us" unites divided ones into many, which is how effortless few conquer many by simply suggesting a label of collectivization.
On a larger scale..."us" implies uniting states aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka mosaic law.
Just like...
Just implies balance, like vs dislike implies imbalance...if ones free will of choice chooses one side over the other.
similar things being done on basically every “front”
Nature fronts (inception towards death) being (life)...few tempt many with artificial sides to front each other, while ignoring nature.
The suggestion "go the front-line" tempts one to ignore being (life) fronted (inception towards death) within a line.
Line implies basis for any shape within....logic (circular thinking) turning into reason (circular conflict) represents abstracts shaped within base.
How could life not use its inception towards death life-line aka the way of all for each one within?
How does inception towards death not implicate each ones life in-between?
bot
What bot can adapt to perceivable inspiration on the fly?
try to impersonate
Im (within) per (by) sonate (sound) implies a trial for each one within aka the TRI (threefold) separation of AL (all) into each one within aka inception>life>death.
Now try to find a bot who could write that without contradicting itself...
Definitely true that the axis “Boomer vs. Zoomer” is being used to divide us all, though it’s not for the overly simplified reason stated in the post, but instead it’s just one of MANY axes being used to divide (and conquer) us. Just like Man vs Woman, “conservative” vs “progressive”, etc etc
In a sense, the post is right, this is being done to silo and isolate groups and prevent them from sharing information and goals. Just important to note the similar things being done on basically every “front” or potential axis of division.
Yes I agree
Versus/verto - "to turn" implies turning against one another aka together aka united in conflict. It's the state of each one within all, which implies division from one another.
If one chooses any side, then one turns against the other.
To be more specific...turning implies within a cycle; being (life) implies within delineation (inception towards death). To invert natural delineation; few shape artificial cycles inside (logic) and outside (reason) of many.
Example: encyclopedia aka en (within) cyclo (circle) pedia (education, child-rearing) as the general course of instruction... https://www.etymonline.com/word/encyclopedia
What's another word for instruction? https://www.etymonline.com/word/Talmud Notice furthermore that a mason calls it a cyclopedia...cause a free-mason ain't in (en) it.
Reasoning implies complex vs complex to reach simplicity...
Axe implies "to split; divide"...many implies unification of one with one another, while ignoring that being one implies division from one another.
The label "us" unites divided ones into many, which is how effortless few conquer many by simply suggesting a label of collectivization.
On a larger scale..."us" implies uniting states aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka mosaic law.
Just implies balance, like vs dislike implies imbalance...if ones free will of choice chooses one side over the other.
Nature fronts (inception towards death) being (life)...few tempt many with artificial sides to front each other, while ignoring nature.
The suggestion "go the front-line" tempts one to ignore being (life) fronted (inception towards death) within a line.
Line implies basis for any shape within....logic (circular thinking) turning into reason (circular conflict) represents abstracts shaped within base.
You can try to impersonate a human sometimes but when the bot os activated he always uses that inception towards death line
How could life not use its inception towards death life-line aka the way of all for each one within?
How does inception towards death not implicate each ones life in-between?
What bot can adapt to perceivable inspiration on the fly?
Im (within) per (by) sonate (sound) implies a trial for each one within aka the TRI (threefold) separation of AL (all) into each one within aka inception>life>death.
Now try to find a bot who could write that without contradicting itself...
Dude, 5 years talking about inception towards death like wtf