easter
- East/aust - "south", hence aust-ralia aka down under.
- East/aus (to shine) + south/sunnon (sun)
festival
Suggested festiv-al tempts each one within all to ignore needing to fast for wanting to feast.
That's also why few tempt many each mourning (morning) to break the fast (breakfast) with a feast...
devils matrix
Devil aka dia (across) ballein (to throw)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/devil
It's motion (father) which generates momentum (mother) to move matter (trans-formed off-spring) across, hence each life from inception towards death.
Matrix/māter implies the mother of matter.
Sleigh of hand: the devil is in the details aka de (entire) taillier (to cut into pieces)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/detail
Want to speed things up?
Need to speed (inception towards death) things (life) up?
If life is a race towards the end, then why cut the umbilical cord instead of using it as a hangman's noose to win faster?
At what moment does a baby choose to "live fast and die young?"
big picture
A picture has to be drawn, hence by a being drawing within origin (visible spectrum of light). Therefore the origin is always bigger than any picture being drawn within.
picture conspiracy
A picture implies a captured moment...being implies matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion. Hence breathing aka spirit/spira.
If many consent to a suggested picture by few; then many are breathing (spira) together (con) aka exhausting each other by attempting to capture a moment (picture).
the dark side would have won
Only within light can there be sides, and only in-between sides can there be darkness. Reasoning (win vs loose) tempts ones choice away from center and towards a side, while ignoring that light expands from center outwards aka light > spectrum > ray.
Choice expresses light while in-between sides; choosing to hold onto a side makes choice go dark.
have won
a) If one could win, then why does the temptation to compete again never end?
b) Why did Rockefeller say that competition is a sin?
c) If win implies versus loss, and growth (life) implies within loss (inception towards death); then...?
d) "I consider it a challenge before the whole human race; and I ain't gonna lose (and I mean to go on and on, and on, and on)... https://genius.com/Queen-we-are-the-champions-lyrics
wipes his ass
Hence adapting to procession...not conservation. Trying to conserve during procession implies constipation aka com (together) + stipare (cram; pack; compress).
a) A bell rings when struck...when struck by suggestion; a consenting mind shapes "circular" logic.
b) Bell/bel - "ba'al"...
not in the ring, but backstage
In the ring implies ones thoughts enclosed within circular logic. Backstage implies the suggestions of others presenting a stage for ones logic, while permitting those presenting to operate from behind the scenes.
wrestle
Israel/yisra'el - "he that striveth with god" implies one who strives (life) within god (inception towards death) by resisting the temptation of others.
To wrestle (engage in a grappling struggle); from wreik (to turn) el (god) implies one who turns from god and against one another (reason) within a ring (logic)...a fictitious struggle.
Bonus: WWF aka world wrestling federation aka federate/foedus (union by agreement; trust) aka ones consent to the suggestion of another, while ignoring all perceivable.
As soon as the trust of consent is established, the suggested can enter and tame the mind afor WWE aka world wrestling entertainment.
conservation of energy
Energy implies internal balance of action/reaction. It cannot be conserved...only held onto on one side (inhale), while releasing on the other (exhale).
It's each one within (en) work (ergy/ergos) that can be tricked to squander self by trying to conserve.
https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/367836/jewish/Basic-Laws-of-a-Jewish-Funeral.htm
Now compare this to the burial rites suggested to gentiles...especially vampiric embalming, and ghoulish cremation.
rational arguments for the position one is taking....social engineering
Ones position implies apart from one another...rational arguing minds (reasoning) are socially engineered to tempt ones against one another.
Social/socius/sekw - "to follow"...implies the domestication of ones free will of choice by consenting to follow the suggested social-ism of another.
Animation (inception towards death) separates being (life)...only resisting the temptation to follow fertilizes being.
nearly impossible to break....do what the group does
Joining makes it harder to break. The issue...nature breaks each being apart from one another, before each being can choose to join each other.
Notice that few suggest many that "breaking bad"...
If you want to be accepted
If/then implies natural; want vs not want or acceptance vs denial implies artificial reasoning...the former sustains each being; while the latter turns beings against each other.
Somewhere there's a Michael Collins Piper episode on how jewish lawyers took over Scientology.
a) (((David Szymanski))) : "Hey fellow frightened humans..."
b) "One of the most" implies the artificial collectivization of natural beings aka pluralism suggested towards perceiving singular units.
c) Uncanny aka not (un) knowing (canny/can/gno) implies a contradiction in terms, since suggested nothing tempts one to ignore everything perceivable.
d) Valley/valei - "lowered position in-between elevated surrounding" aka ones lowered perception surrounded by elevated suggestions by another, while ignoring all perceivable.
e) "Looked" implies ones consent look/locking onto the suggestion of another.
f) Evolution implies the unrolling (evolu) of action (tion)...reasoning implies reactions rolled together into conflict, while ignoring action.
Consenting to a suggestion establishes CIRCULAR logic within self, which TURNS into conflicts of reason against others...that's how few utilize suggestion to gain control (rolled together) over many.
the validity of alleged paranormal sightings
a) To allege implies shaping a suggestion towards the consent of another...if one consents; then the suggested distorts ones perceiving sight within perceivable.
b) Valid implies "legally binding", which tempts one to ignore that natural law offers each being within free will of choice, hence not bound until choosing to give consent to a suggestion by another.
c) Paranormal tricks one to consent to suggested norms aka standards; patterns; models aka systems suggested by few to gain consensual control over many.
Norm/norma/gnōmōn - "carpenter's square" aka suggested norms representing the square, and ones consent binding one into circular logic representing the compass of freemasonry.
how much of it is just fake and gay ops
However much one consents to hold onto, while ignoring that nature moves.
is there anything that seems legit?
Legit/lex - "law" aka natural law, which moves all perceivable through each ones perception. Any suggested laws by another tempt one to ignore natural law.
The trick...few tempt many to seek to legitimize aka to affix rules, while ignoring that nature moves, and therefore cannot be affixed by those within.
validity of sighting
Whatever ones sees will be different from any other, because a moving nature separates the position of each one within from one another.
The unwashed masses are being tricked to validate each others different sights, thereby ignoring how nature operates.
This is how the majority of mankind communicates with one another... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_men_and_an_elephant YET they aren't blind, but willfully ignorant of each ones unique sight.
- Measles/miser - "distress"
- Distress aka dis (apart) + stringere (drawn together)
Many consenting to few "telling-a-vision" artificially draws together what nature sets apart from one another.
A jew suggests STRESS (together) to tempt gentiles to ignore DIS (apart)...measles and television as well as any other sickness or entertainment suggested, represent layers of deception to distract from the aforementioned contradiction of dis (apart) + stress (together).
Being implies dis (life) within stress (inception towards death) aka calm within storm. Calm/kaiein - "to burn", hence caustic aka the burned offering, and guess what another word for calm is? Gentle/gentile... https://www.etymonline.com/word/calm
But why?
Matter (life) within the momentum (inception towards death) of motion implies a trans-formation within the male + female nature.
The inversion thereof...MASH-ing together what nature sets apart.
Just like before eve we were both.
a) Suggested dualism (both) and pluralism (we) tempts singular (one) to ignore "before" aka being (life) forwarded (inception towards death).
b) Adam > Eve aka the split (rip) of the atom (adam) implies male (motion) through fe-male (momentum) trans-formation (matter).
c) Same (perceivable) separates differences (perception)...likeness (suggestion) tempts alike (consent) reactions aka monkey see/monkey do.
They wish to speed it along so fewer will be saved.
Speed (inception towards death) remains the same...delay (life) differentiates aka alternates aka transforms.
As in...only within speed of light can rays refract.
British
Here's a wild one...British aka B'rith (covenant), as in B'nai B'rith aka B'nai/banim/bene/ben (son) aka the covenant of "big" ben.
Directly from Blacks...
Light directs. Black implies absence of light...being implies presence within light. Absence implies ones ignorance of presence aka ones lack of self discernment aka enlightenment, which one cannot find in-between the covers of Blacks Law Dictionary, hence putting blinders onto ones sight.
fifth edition
a) There can be only one.
b) Edition/edere - "to bring forth, produce"...only nature brings (inception) forth (death) each produced one (life).
understand
a) Few put under + stand together under mosaic law, to tempt many to ignore that natural law separates each unit of being from one another, thereby establishing a place to be aka a stance for each being.
b) Each word is shaped by LETTERS...ones consent LETS another shape words. Consenting to a suggestion implies ones submission elevating the position of another aka slave selecting master by willingly "standing under".
To Know
Aka all perceivable forwarding (to) each ones perception (know)...understanding implies ones consent standing-under the suggestions of another.
A little simpler...to implies towards aka nature moving through each being. Know/gno - "to perceive" implies each being reacting to natural moving through.
to apprehend the meaning
Aka to apprehend (consent) the meaning (suggestion)...while ignoring that all perceivable moves through each ones perception and cannot be apprehended aka held onto.
The trick...few suggest information to tempt many to ignore perceivable inspiration. The former tempts ones mind/memory to hold onto, while ignoring that the latter moves.
to appreciate
Nature implies moving value (all perceivable); each being within implies a unique evaluation (ones perception) thereof...suggested meaning tempts one to ignore that. Consenting to a suggestion sets a value (appreciates) aka affixes a meaning within ones mind/memory.
Example...holding onto a child devalues the moving value of a living child by restricting living expressions.
to understand the nature and effect of an act
a) Only nature acts (cause); each being within re-acts (effect).
b) Few suggest actors under directors to tempt many to ignore being reactors (life) within direction (inception towards death).
c) Nature impresses (action) expressions (reactions)...understanding (standing-under) suppresses expressions.
To have a FULL and CLEAR Knowledge of; to COMPREHEND.
a) TO aka towards implies a separation of whole into partials...therefore a partial can neither be full, nor clear...only filling self up, while clearing self out.
b) Comprehend implies com (together) prehendere (to hold; seize)...that's an artificial inversion of nature freeing partials from one another.
You are spreading LIES, and are NOT to be believed in ANYTHING you say.
a) Lies implies versus truths aka a conflict of reason aka two sides mutually turning against each other.
Reason (versus) represents the artificial inversion of natural implication (if/then)...there's no versus conflict in all of nature until one chooses versus/vertere/wer (to turn) against each one other.
b) No (nothing) is based on creatio ex nihilo... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo aka artificial creation out of nothing as the inversion of natural transformation (partial) within everything (whole).
Few suggest nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) to tempt many to de-nial perceivable reality for suggested fiction.
c) To believe implies ones consent to the suggestion of another one, while ignoring all perceivable.
Believe/be-leubh - "to care; desire" implies a being desiring and carrying the suggestions of one another, while ignoring that nature carries (inception towards death) being (life), and that being needs to resist the wanted temptation of being carried away.
I almost fell
Being implies rising (life) during fall (inception towards death).
Natural Law, REDUNDANT of course
Redundant/re-undare - "again rise in waves"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/redundant hence being solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death) aka rising waves within water.
The U.S. Constitution is Common and Superior
Uniting states (us) constitutes an inferior common (many) under a unique superior (few).
Nature generates each unique unit through internal/inherent separation of energy.
because it is a Contract
Because aka "cause of being" implies expansion by decompression, hence dividing each effect within cause from one another to allow growth (life) within loss (inception towards death).
Cause sets each being free from one another...other beings bind ones free will of choice to affect the effects of an ignored cause.
Free will of choice implies the opposite of a contract, which is why others suggest contracts to bind ones free will of choice....that contract implies ones consent to any suggestion of another aka ones choice selecting a chosen one over self by "standing under".
COMMERCE CLAUSE
Com implies "together"; being implies "apart"...a commercial suggestion tempts the consenting being to restrict itself, hence feeling claustrophobic when ignoring reality (cause) for fiction (clause).
Nature sentences life from inception towards point of death...a suggest clause terminates ones life sentence if one consents to the stipulating covenant of ignoring self for others.
Everything falls directly under the commerce
Fall directs (inception towards death) rise (life)...by setting each one within FREE from one another. Buying (consent) and selling (suggestion) tempts one to ignore being free will of choice, hence binding self within a contract aka religion/religo - "to bind anew".
the current weakness in the bond market
a) Ones consent to any suggestion by another implies a contract of bondage, made by buying (consent) and selling (suggestion) of livestock on a market aka staking ones life.
b) Current (inception towards death) inspires strength (living) to resist the temptation of weakness (dying). Falling for a temptation weakens ones resisting strength.
to escape the fall
One (life) cannot escape the fall (inception towards death)...holding onto suggested currency only tempts one to ignore perceivable current.
gold
Gold/ghel - "to shine"...light casts rays; each ray casts shadows upon one another.
Holding onto a shadow represents a phantasm (suggested information), which tempts one to ignore the brightness of actuality (perceivable inspiration). As nature shines; each being within dims...unless resisting temptations.
I did not sell stock
a) Buying into a market sells self out as "life-stock" to a merchant.
b) Not/nothing/nihilo implies that one bought into de-nial of perceivable, after selling self out to suggested nihil-ism.
Few sell "nothing" to tempt many to buy into a sellout of self... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI
If you love me, keep my commandments
a) If implies then...moving separation. Love implies vs hate aka holding onto a side; turning against each other, while ignoring moving separation.
b) Why use "my" (belonging to me) when giving commands to the minds of others? My implies taking possession of given...which prevents potential from expressing.
I will pray to
a) To pray/prek - "to ask" tempts ones to ignore all giving each one free WILL of choice.
b) To implies towards outcome, which tempts one to ignore that ones free will of choice was given by origin.
c) Ask/ais - "to wish, desire"...that's the wanted temptation one needs to resist by free will of choice.
Counsellor
Who benefits from COUNting and SELLing...the merchant or the ones buying into it?
Spirit of truth
a) Spirit moves through one, hence inhale towards exhale...truth tempts one to hold onto it; while fighting lies.
b) Spirit implies change...truth and lies contradict change by fighting each other for an affixed status quo.
c) Few suggest that the "truth will set you free"...holding onto truth, while fighting lies implies by ones FREE WILL of choice.
doesn’t see him and doesn’t know him
Being able to see (perception) implies within knowledge (perceivable)...others suggest "doesn't" to tempt ones de-nial (nihilo; nothing) thereof.
HE (motion) SHE (momentum)...that's how HE and the S(plit) of HE transforms into each ones (matter) perception.
A partial cannot see whole, while being separated within...yet only separated from one another can each partial SEE what all has to offer.
I am in my Father, and you in me
Taking the corruption out...jesus aka je suis (I am) and the possessive disappears (my/me) as well as the possessor (you). What's left...each anointed one (christ) within father (god).
If a man loves me, he will keep my word
ME; MY; KEEP...taking potential and holding it within possession, while getting possessed by the spells (word) crafted by others.
arise
Only during fall (inception towards death) can one rise (life)...rising requires one to resist the temptation to take given into possession. Why? Because one cannot hold onto the fall without ignoring to rise.
Others suggest one to earn/urn a raise/rise as a return (response to turn) of payment (piece of mind)...
Common Law
a) Before common law, there's mosaic law aka putting the partials together into a common-wealth, and before that...natural law setting each part apart from one another.
b) Common law for many establishes maritime law for few aka maritime/mori - "body of water", which implies the body of the common wealth (many) for the sovereign commander (few) at the helm.
Both Common law and maritime law operate during natural law...ignored by many; exploited by few.
Statutory Law
Aka "law of the land" implies ones position (status/sta - to stand) within natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater)...which one ignores when consenting to common law, since consent establishes a sovereign over ones free will of choice, hence tempting one choice to understand (stand under) a chosen ones suggestion.
Put it through AI and it will translate it for you
Utilize both Black's Law Dictionary and the oldest dictionary at hand to compare the nouns and adjectives attached to the nouns to the modern translation.
Alloidal Title
a) Alloidal/alluvium - "matter deposited by flowing water"...deposit implies the division of position among matter (life) within motion (inception towards death). That's natural law.
b) A title implies ones consent to a suggestion by another, hence marking self, while paying a title/tithe aka one-tenth aka ONEself ignoring reality (1) for fiction (0) aka everything perceivable for suggested nothing/nihilo (nihilism + denial).
In short: just like "sovereign citizen" so does "alloidal title" contradict itself when put together.
The God Makers
Ones consent to suggested THE-ism makes another the sovereign over self.
I'm thinking, for somebody to believe...
Believing implies thinking within the confines of others, hence circular thinking (logic) based ones consent to believe in suggested words (logos).
Meanwhile...nature moves sound through each one within, which cannot be held onto, nor requires confirmation through belief. It inspires thought to implicate (if/then), hence to balance in-between origin and outcome...as free will of choice.
a) How could one perceive how many other ones there are if all separates each one from one another?
b) Instead of seeking forecasts by others; why not ask self what casts forward (inception towards death) each one (life)?
c) Consenting to a prediction establishes a predicament within one.
d) Proposition (perceivable) does not make prediction (suggested) towards subjects (perception)... try reading Aristotle's "Antepraedicamenta".
Aka able to respond to mark, which implies the choice of each gentile able to respond by consent to the suggested mark by a jew.
A jew is being enabled to mark gentiles if a response is given willingly.
Aka raddix/radius/ray...implying each ones growth outwards by resisting temptations, not ones belonging to racial groups.
Temporary living within the ongoing process of dying implies each ones "race to the bottom"...and it ain't about racing towards the finish line either.
A jew suggests pluralism (people) to make gentiles "alike" each other, which in return permits each chosen one to remain apart from one another... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806
A jew tempts gentiles to reason against each other (like vs not like), while ignoring their ignorance of being differentiated (life) from one another during same (inception towards death).
Yet using words implies ones consent holding onto the suggested spell-craft by another, while ignoring that perceivable sound moves through one and cannot be held onto.
If one thinks in words by others, then those ain't ones thoughts either...
Aka mastering ones free will of choice by utilizing masonry/magic/magh - "to be able" to tempt others into ignoring their free will choice, hence enslaving self when using consent to enable the suggestions of a chosen master.
A mason of free (will of choice) utilizes suggested information as bricks, and the consent by others as mortar, to build walls of ignorance into the minds of those who ignore perceivable inspiration.
To agree or disagree with the suggestion of another, confines one within a conflict of reason (agree vs disagree), while ignoring to be a partial (perception) within absolute (perceivable).
One can only be here and now aka during (life) a passage (inception towards death).
a) Because gentiles willingly ignore that intelligence/intelligo - "to understand" implies...STANDING UNDER, hence whenever a gentiles gives consent to the suggestions by a jew in the attempt to understand...he willingly stands under a jew aka submits self as a slave, while selecting a jew as a master.
b) Quotient aka "quantity resulting from the division of one number by another, number of times one quantity is contained in another" implies the quantity of gentiles dividing each other within conflicts of reason, in the attempt to understand the jewish suggestions they're reasoning against each other about.
c) A jew isn't higher because of growth, but because of gentiles lowering themselves until only a jew remains standing above.