to built Palantir
Palan (far) tir (to watch) aka being farsighted...it's ones shortsightedness which grows farsightedness for others.
If one consents to any suggestion, then one confines ones mind to circular thinking (logic), which in return permits others to see further, than ones shortsighted logic allows.
Nature moving all perceivable through each beings perception implies a straight line, hence allowing those who think straight to see far ahead aka seeing far aka sea farer aka se-phar (dic jew) etc.
Agreeing or disagreeing with the above prevents ones mind from thinking straight by establishing a circle within self (logic) and one outside self (reason), hence any suggested information shaping a conflict of reason (agree vs disagree) if one consents to it.
Whatever one consented to; whatever one believes; whatever one holds onto...that permits others to watch far (palan-tir), while confining self to see less.
surveillance + anti-christ
Christ (anointed one) implies separation from one another...surveillance requires connection with one another.
Consenting to a suggestion establishes an artificial connection, which in return tempts one to ignore natural separation.
Ignorance implies the antagonist (anti) within self (christ).
keen interest
Aka keen/kene/can (to be able) inter (within) esse (essence; being)...the status quo of being implies essential (essence within all) and therefore enabled by.
Enabling others...dulls ones keenness.
Peter Thiel ...Palantir
a) Palan (far) + tir (to watch) aka being farsighted/forecasting/ prescient, which is pretty simple for few suggesting a world wide web for consenting many to confine themselves in.
A farmer doesn't have to watch far if the cattle are enclosed.
The real world wide web represents "mass consensus" to suggested information by few...held within the mind/memory of each consenting one among the masses.
b) Peter Thiel aka "the reptile"...reptile (repere; to creep) implies "to move secretly as to evade detection" and tile refers to the generated tile (gentile) within mosaic law as suggested by any jew.
What's a mosaic? A process of making patterns of inlaid work in hard materials aka putting together solids (life) within fluid (inception towards death) aka puzzling together artificially (synthesis) what nature separates (analysis) aka tikkun olam...repairing the world by bringing together.
Those apart... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806 can move secretly as to evade detection among those brought together.
You reduce everything to words.
I take words apart to describe the natural sound within which artificial words were put together.
As in...everything implies sound; each thing within implies instrument; words shaped by instruments imply nothing (nihilo; suggested nihilism aka ones denial of all perceivable sound).
when you post... it will cost you
a) Supply (inception towards death) generates demand (life).
b) A jew inverted natural supply (perceivable) and demand (perception) into artificial supply (suggested) and demand (consent).
c) A jew supplies artifice to demanding gentiles, yet if a gentile "posts" it, then demand tries to supply...that's competition. Same with drugs; weapons; prostitution; banking; insurance etc.
d) Here's the mainstream test for your lolicon shit..."rule 34 Simpsons". Lisa; Bart; all the kids at school, even Maggie...no disclaimer; no censorship; no re-captcha shenanigans; no paywalls etc.
As for The Simpsons itself...supplied for piracy since 1989 and counting.
persecuted class
a) Per (by) secu (divide)...that's the opposite of classification.
b) A jew tempts gentiles to classify each other, which inverts the nature of being by (life) division (inception towards death). Students joining classes; class-warfare or class-consciousness are based on the same trick.
c) If a jew refers to being persecuted, then that implies within nature...not by gentiles.
claim themselves to be
Others are opposing claims, because they themselves are claiming one side within a conflict of reason...to be vs not to be.
Gentiles are being tricked to believe that anything within a moving nature can be claimed, which in return permits each jew to shape any claim ad absurdum. These are simple mental tricks... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum
tricking people with promises of freedom but imprisoning them and their free will
a) The trick is that each gentile has free will of choice, yet chooses to bind self to a jewish suggestion mentally. That's im-prison-ment aka being within the prison of mind.
b) Promise/promittere - "send forwards" implies perceivable sending perception forwards aka DOM (inception towards death) setting FREE (life). Ones consent to suggested freedom ignores that, while binding self to another.
the identity of the Goyim will be eradicated
A jew suggests identity aka idealism aka idolatry to trick the will of gentiles to ignore being (life) eradicated (inception towards death). Holding onto any wanted identity ignores ones need to resist being eradicated.
Nature moves being; being cannot stop or retard nature...trying to stop or retard each other implies being ignoring nature.
a) Claiming contradicts "free" will of choice.
b) Reasoning implies one side vs the other aka a synthesis...not an analysis. A jew tempts gentiles to ignore analysis (perception) for synthesis (suggestion).
c) Talmud implies instruction aka being (life) within the structure of action (inception towards death).
d) Reconciliation of contradiction requires one to resist the temptation of reasoning against others. Only implication (if/then) reconciles reason (vs).
e) Action (cause) subjects reaction (effect). Action cannot be subjected...beings can subject themselves to one another's reactions, while ignoring action.
f) Meaning isn't deep...it implies holding onto a suggested measurement, while ignoring to grow up aka hiding from the response-ability to discern self.
g) Logical argumentation implies circular thinking (logic) turning into conflict (reason); both of which prevent ones mind from thinking straight.
There can be only one.
like what's next
One implies different from one another...likeness represents a suggested deception tempting ones consent to ignore self for others, hence establishing a like minded consensus.
you know what I mean
Suggesting a meaning tempts another to ignore perceivable knowledge. Perceivable moves through ones perception, while suggested meaning tempts one to hold onto it...thereby ignoring motion.
now you get
Now implies the perceivable momentum of motion for any matter within. One cannot GET more than each one within all already GOT.
More vs less represents a fictitious conflict among ones within oneness about getting more or less from all each one already got.
what's it even mean
Being implies odd (choice ) within even (balance)...choosing to hold onto any suggested meaning puts one at odds with one another aka uneven/imbalanced.
Knowledge is power though too.
Knowledge empowers..."too" implies an artificial addition to how natural knowledge empowers each being within. There can't be an addition to knowledge aka no addition to source of power, BUT those empowered can be tricked with suggested additions to ignore the one and only source of power.
Money is power.
Money implies a suggested currency empowered by consent. So for a jew...money is power of gentile consensus to artificial currency, while ignoring natural current.
Time is money
Both time and money imply artificial measurements taken within naturally given. Nature doesn't give time or money...each being within takes it from one another as suggestible measures taken into mind/memory.
is
Nature WAS perceivable before any being within can suggest to another what it IS.
mo money = mo problems
a) Problem implies thing (life) put forward (inception towards death)...a problem can only be shaped within solution.
b) Solution generating problems implies internal differentiation...others invert this by suggesting equalization (=) aka conformity; hivemind; collective consciousness; gestalt intelligence; golem/goyim; Gleichschaltung etc.
c) Solution generating problem by differentiation implies oneness (cause) generating each one (effect)...there cannot be MO than ONE, yet one can be tricked to ignore oneself by counting other ones together into more than one, which is called collectivism; pluralism; multiplicity; variety; heterogeneity etc.
d) Mo implies money aka mo(ney) than (m)one(y)...with the additional sleight of hand Y (phonetic why aka for what cause).
nephilim
Aka "fallen ones" in Hebrew, which refers to each ones rise (life) during fall (inception towards death).
giant
Which implies ones growth within all loss. A jew suggests the label "nephilim" to distract each gentile from discerning self to be a "fallen one". Consenting to any suggestion prevents ones growth...
stories for ADULTS
a) To store/story implies holding onto, which in return restricts growth.
b) Infant implies within (in) speech (bha)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/infant Adulterate implies "mixing together"...hence mixing articulated speech (words) within natural sound. History tempts ones memory to store articulated speech; mixed together by others. A jew uses gentile memory as a cauldron for alchemy.
They lie to you about everything...
a) ...which includes "truth".
b) Everything implies change, each thing within implies separation (life) during change (inception towards death).
what's up with the way they use the term "distortion"
Dis (to divide) tort/torquere (to twist). All perceivable moves straight through each ones perception...holding onto anything suggested (logos) twists ones mind into circular thinking (logic); which then turns into conflicts (reason) against others.
The way doesn't divide (dis) by twisting (tort)...it divides (life) by straightening (inception towards death).
deviation from the original
Aka deviation (suggestion) from the original (perception).
part of an Infinite Creator
Infinite implies "finite within" aka partial within whole. Others suggest creationism aka creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing) to distort partial from discerning self within whole.
Creation implies the inversion of transformation aka the transfer of form (life) within action (inception towards death).
all is one
Not IS but IN...all (whole) was before each one (partial) comes into being within. What others suggest it IS tempts one to ignore being IN (perception) what was (perceivable).
All for one and one for all.
karma
Karma/krnoti/kwer - "to make, form"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/karma
Being implies form (life) within flow (inception towards death), which implies that flow allows form to make form into shape.
Flow (inception towards death) dissolving what form (life) shapes....that's karmic justice, which is inescapable, and absolute/absolving.
A jew shapes form (suggested information) to distract gentiles from flow (perceivable inspiration)...the horror in this world represents the karmic justice punishing gentiles for ignoring flow for shapes formed by a jew.
Each jew has the free will of choice to shape form...it's a gentiles consent to hold onto any suggested form which binds ONES CHOICE to a CHOSEN ONES suggestion, hence inverting aka distorting each gentiles state of being.
hate the media
Media/medius - "middle"...choosing love or hate tempts ones free will of choice into a conflict of reason (love vs hate). Having a choice implies being within the middle of balance...choosing a side implies imbalance of choice.
Others mediate sides (love or hate) to tempt ones choice off-center, and into imbalance (love vs hate).
hating influence
Being implies solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death)...others invert this by using in-flu-encers to share in-form-ation. Holding onto form tempts one to ignore flow.
Loving or hating artificial influence tempts one to ignore being formed within natural flow...not two sides fighting each other, but the separation of sides (inception/death) into sight (life).
india
Aka within (in) two (dia), hence the system of caste/kes - "to cut". Notice furthermore that the suggested caste of In-dia (Brahmins; Kshatriyas; Vaishyas; Shudras) distracts from the perceivable division into two...touchable (suggested information) and untouchable (perceivable inspiration) aka "rules for thee, but not for me".
Psycho/psyche - "animating power" + babbly/babble - "confusion; disorder"...ignoring animating power (inception towards death) establishes confusion and disorder among the animated power (life) within.
the keepers of that knowledge
Knowledge cannot be kept...others utilize ones fear of losing to tempt ones consent to hold onto suggested "knowledge".
The trick is about the use of the word "knowledge" to exchange perceivable inspiration (moving through one) with suggested information (held within one). Those who hold onto information believe it to be knowledge, and are afraid of not just letting it go, but to even question it, which could loosen their hold over it.
Perceivable inspiration is always available for each one within to draw from by adapting to the motion of it...which one cannot see while holding onto suggested information.
Perception within perceivable implies potential within process. Memory holding onto suggested implies taking into ones possession, while getting possessed by another.
to enslave
Slave/slav/slovo - "word; speech"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Slav
To implies "towards" aka sound moving towards instrument. Word aka articulation of sound by speech implies a contract between seller of suggestion (master) and buyer by consent (slave).
REASON implies slaves fighting each other over a masters suggestion. LOGIC implies circular thinking of each slave aka the ring that binds ones free will of choice. LOGOS implies the suggested word by a master tempting the consenting slave into binding self (logic), while fighting (reason) others.
Think of it this way: when you act in a way that is out of alignment with the Law of One
If it's one, then there's only one way (inception towards death) for each one within (life)..."this way" suggests that there's another way.
Alignment implies each ones mind (perception) within a line (perceivable)...others utilize spell-craft like "think of it this way" to tempt one out of alignment aka out of thinking straight, and into thinking circular (logic; reason).
Law of One (love, unity, compassion)
Love implies versus hate aka two together. Unity implies a collection of units, and compassion implies together (com) within passage (pass) of action (ion).
Love; unity, and compassion contradict the law of one.
you create a vibration of dissonance within your own being
The suggestion of creationism tempts those who consent to take the created into possession aka to "own" it.
Being implies potential (life) within process of nature (inception towards death)...which cannot be owned; possessed or taken, since it moves through one.
Energy implies a flowing process...internally forming potential aka dis-sonance (division of sound) generating re-sonance (response to sound).
Turning dissonance and resonance against one another implies vibration/vibrare/weip - "to turn"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/vibrant
A jew establishes this vibration internally (logic) and externally (reason) among gentiles, as to tempt them to mutually and willingly move to and fro within internal and external conflicts.
In short...resonance vs dissonance (consent vs suggested) implies fiction; resonance (perception) within dissonance (perceivable) implies nature.
Applied example...choosing to upvote or downvote this comment implies ones RESONANCE with one side establishing DISSONANCE against the other. To remain free implies needing to resist the wanted temptation to take turns within any conflict of reason.
- Licence/leik - "to offer; bargain"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/licence
Only nature offers all (perceivable) through each one (perception)...bargaining among one another, by consenting to a suggestion, exchanges a license between ones choice of consent and a chosen ones suggestion.
The suggested becomes the license; ones consent by free will of choice the license-holder. Holding (consent) a license (suggested) establishes ones own prohibition of free will of choice by free will of choice aka holding oneself in bondage to another, without any visible strings attached.
https://img.gvid.tv/i/3RncDbZw.jpg ...that's what consenting to a suggestion implies.
your energy
En (within) ergo/reg (to move in a straight line)...moving within a straight line implies as potential (life) within procession (inception towards death).
"Your" implies taking possession, which corrupts potential within procession. Others utilize suggestion to tempt ones consent to take possession thereof, which is how ones attention is lured away from ones potential to survive all procession.
feeds system
Anything suggested implies a system at the moment ones consent feeds it.
Nature generating being isn't systemic (standing together) but endemic (standing apart).
a) How is that word salad? How could cause not be equal? How could an effect not be diverse? How is affection among effects not a correlation distracting from cause?
b) Choosing to write "free will" without "of choice" denies ones free will of choice to write...
c) Mephisto/mephitz - "to destroy"...does analysis destroy synthesis?
Both Gaza and Ukraine are about jewish expansion, and both the white slave trade out of Ukraine, and the mass migration out of Gaza are fueling yet more conflicts among gentiles.
Correlation does not equal Causation.
Equal implies cause for each diverse effect within...ignoring cause for one another's affection implies correlation.
Doctors under Oath
Taking an oath (hippocratic or witness testimony) implies perjury to given.
The judicial process implies nature divining/dividing being...taking whats given by oath implies perjury to process.
Notice furthermore that in Hebrew oath implies curse... https://biblehub.com/hebrew/7621.htm And then there's also kol nidre aka the annulment of any vows/oaths/pledges/promises made.
religion worries about rapture
a) Rapture/raptus (to carry off) + religion/religare (to bind fast)...if form (life) within flow (inception towards death) binds itself, then it gets carries off faster.
b) Worry/wergh/wer (to turn)...if a being (life) binds itself to be carried off faster, then it turned from origin (inception) towards outcome (death).
c) What's the opposite of rapture (to carry off)? To repent/repel/resist...which requires the use of ones free will of choice.
Religion implies entering bondage by free will of choice.
No word about choosing death over life...sodomy (sod) implies soil contamination aka pollution aka improper waste disposal.
I have mixed emotions
Because this obvious propaganda was designed to mix together modesty vs immodesty among natives, while distracting from lack of modesty and exponentially increasing immodesty among foreigners.
Also...those who bring in foreign rapists to prey upon immodest natives are also tempting modest natives to act like whores, while censoring "rape" in the name of political correctness.
Loss implies linear progression; war implies circular conflict during linear progression...suggested info tempts those who consent into circular conflict against each other, while ignoring to grow within linear progression.
Loss (inception towards death) moves towards growth (life)...taking anything during loss tempts one to ignore given, which sacrifices growth.
Only during census can one censor. A jew suggested the world wide web to tempt gentiles into giving "consensus" by accessing it, which in return permits each jew to censor the consensus.
Sleight of hand: "judge not, that ye be not judged"...other word for judge? Censere/censor...