Martin Luther has been the greatest encouragement of my life.
Claiming life to be mine, while carrying the courage from another within mind...that's called split-personality disorder.
A being cannot claim nature, nor gain courage/corage (heart) from another.
Martin Luther has been...great; the greatest; a giant
"You shall have no other gods before me" ~Exodus 20:3
the coming of the new dawn and the new age.
"What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun." ~Ecclesiastes 1:9
the jews need to be destroyed
Only during destruction (inception towards death) can one build (life)...wanting to destroy other builders tempts one to ignore need.
What does a jew build? Ignorance within gentiles! That's how destruction builds.
we're only beginning to see
a) Sight implies singularity...plurality implies lack of insight.
b) One (life) can neither see beginning (inception) nor end (death) of self.
need to carry this work
Work implies energy...being implies employed within energy, hence carried (life) along (inception towards death). Work inspires employee to resist (need), while tempting ignorance as the path of least resistance (want).
acting in accordance with the will of Almighty God
a) One cannot come into accord (agreement) with all might...one can only grow ones might within all, which agreement or denial diminishes.
b) God acts...each being within re-acts as will (want) within God (need).
c) Will implies choice...God doesn't require choice, because what would God choose from that God not already was? Only one within all requires choice.
the most important work
Only within Gods work can there be import (inception) and export (death) of employee (life)...most vs less implies a conflict among employees who ignore work for produce.
undertake
That implies gambling a game of Jenga aka the tower of babel...take from under until everything above collapses upon the player.
Notice that a jew suggests money to gentiles who take from under, while usury is added on top, to take the bottom from under gentiles...
to be against...
...tempts one to ignore TOWARDS (inception towards death) BEING (life) by turning against one another. The former implies linear progression; the latter a circle. What does circular movement during linear progression imply? A hamster-wheel...
get rid of
Rid; verb - "set free"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rid
Nature gets rid of being by giving each "free" will of choice...choosing to get rid of one another tempts ones choice to select a chosen one. That ain't how one gets rid of a jew...
Preside; verb - "be set over others"...nature sets each being apart from one another, not over or under each other. A jew suggests a presidium to tempt a consensus among gentiles to sit under others.
Anyone believing that a president exists permits another to set over one.
who is really in charge
If real implies ones response (re) to all (all), then all charges one, which gives each one the choice to re-charge.
That’s a lot of cover-ups
Nature reveals all to each one within...few cast many into lots to conceal.
satanic movement
Both the suggestion of "who is" and "lot" tempt ones consent to ignore movement...that's the satanic deception.
a) That's his "alleged" name... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigmund_Freud
b) Schlomo/shlomo/šālôm - "peace" aka being a piece (being) within whole (nature).
c) Nature isn't literal (according to suggested letters), but flowing (perceivable sound) figurative (perceiving instrument).
In-stru-ment implies mind structured within...that's where Freud applied psychoanalysis within by the synthesis of literal words like "schizo".
a) Free will of choice needs to resist the temptation to admit or deny anything...otherwise one would bind self to a side within a conflict of reason (admit vs denial) against another.
b) As for nazi/nati - "native"...each being within nature implies a native among foreigners.
c) Chronic/chronos - "time" implies a measurement taken, while ignoring all given motion. Free will of choice needs to resist the wanted temptation to take given.
Purification implies ongoing process of dying; extraction implies temporary living within aka form extracted during the purification process of flow.
As for what...chickenbutt, what else? It ain't about guessing based on consensus over the suggestions of another, but about each ones self discernment as form (perception) within flow (perceivable).
a) Can you show any instance of ChatGPT that can transform OP's post into the response made by free-will-of-choice?
b) How could GPT aka generative pre-trained transformer adapt on the fly to perceivable inspiration, when its pre-trained with suggested information?
c) Paul Beuler...that's the jew who coined "schizophrenia" and "schizoid", and who conspired with that other jew Sigismund Schlomo Freud to conquer psychiatry...successfully, as can be seen by the use of "schizo" as an insult.
In nature...a schism implies a separation (analysis) not a brand upon another (synthesis).
d) What's the quickest way to Dresden? Steckst'n Finger in Arsch and drehst'n...
Inject/infect aka forcing of a fluid into a body (inject) to pollute solid (infect).
Nature implies fluid (inception towards death) separating solid (life) from one another aka extraction by purification...infection by injection represents the inversion thereof.
sterilized by radiation
One issue with that...light fertilizes. The trick...exposing to radiation other than light (once called X-ray), hence done within a warehouse aka a house darkening awareness.
Notice CDFA (California Department of Food and Agriculture) containing "department" aka the departing of mind from light (discernment) into darkness (ignorance).
Certificate
Certify/certus - "fixed"...the suggested inversion of ones dis-cern-ment as solid (perception) within fluid (perceivable).
What does CERN do? Shaping a huge circle (circular logic) to accelerate particles (perception) within whole (perceivable) against one another, hence making them collide (conflicts of reason).
Notice that CERN is an Intergovernmental organization aka governing a mind internally by organization of particles aka mosaic law aka a puzzle where each piece has a fixed position.
priests can...but you will burn for heresy
a) Priest/presby/pres (one who leads the cattle) from per (forward)...
If one follows forwards, then a priest can lead.
b) Heresy aka hearsay...nature implies sound instrumentalizing being. Hearing what another says in words tempts the ignorance of sound for which one burns.
Why burning? Because choosing want (word) over need (sound) inflames ones burning desire.
vote
Vote/vow - "one who offers a sacrifice" aka sacrificing self when voting for another as ones representative.
non-voters tend to die earlier
Because a vow (vote) to nothing (not) destroys a being within everything nature offers. Nothing implies suggested nihil-ism tempting ones de-nial of everything perceivable.
study of
Study implies "to apply oneself"..."of" contradicts that. The suggestion OF another tempts consent TO APPLY ONESELF...that's the vow/vote one makes when sacrificing self to another.
psychology
Aka psyche (animating power aka natures linear progression of being) + logy (logic aka circular thinking about artifice, while ignoring natures linear progression).
Psycho (natural) or logy (artificial)...analysis reveals what synthesis conceals.
No. It implies a hammer
a) Putting reason (yes vs no) before implication (if/then) puts the shape before the line it's being shaped within...an inversion.
If/then aren't turned against one another like yes vs no...if cause/then effect; if all/then one; if action/then reaction; if process/then potential etc.
b) If reason implies a hammer, then how does hammering another down helps one to grow?
c) "The nail that sticks out gets hammered down"...it's about synthesis preventing analysis. A society cannot allow free will of choice...any reason will be used to destroy whoever questions what holds society together.
Each member of a society holds a consensus together, while ignoring that nature sets each being apart from one another, hence giving free will of choice. This consensus is where the hammer of reason is used to fight tooth and nail against any implied contradiction to the consensus.
A jew doesn't fight for the consensus...gentiles are fighting (reasoning) against one another, while destroying themselves and the social consensus in the process of nature, while each jew injects artifice into the conflicts from both sides to fuel the flames.
It implies a fortress
Fort/fortis - "strength" within a process is build by resisting (need) the temptation (want) to hold onto. Choosing to hold onto a side within reason, while fighting the other...weakens strength.
Your beliefs
a) Be (being) lief/leubh (to care) implies burdening self, while ignoring that nature relieves each being within.
c) Your implies taking possession, while ignoring that process (inception toward death) relieves potential (life) of burdening possession.
d) The origin of YOU (phonetic jew) implies one taking possession over self as I AM (je suit; jesus)...that implies the jew-dah vs jesus conflict of betrayal aka the inversion of self among another.
a piece of paper
Being implies a piece of all...paper/papy (father) tempts one to ignore that aka "And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." ~Matthew 23:9
Writing words on paper aka crafting spells implies in the name of the father...
Sound moves through air, yes?
a) Sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all" implies motion separating into momentum (land, air, water) for each matter within.
b) Sound moves linear...yes vs no implies circular conflict about words, shaped within linear sound.
If you truly want to describe sound
a) Sound implies need for each instrument within...instrument wanting (true) vs not wanting (false) from one another ignores sound needed.
b) If implies then...linear progression without conflict. The use of "truly" and "want" tempt the shaping of circular confinement (logic) against one another (reason).
c) Describe implies the division (de) of any written word and the sound it's written within.
Scribe/scriba - "teacher of jewish law"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/scribe This is why gentiles describing anything to one another with words will always mislead those who ignore sound.
go open up a recording tool, make sounds at a microphone, and post pictures of
a) Go/gan - "to depart" implies whole (sound) dividing (de) into partial (instrument)...not the noise an instrument makes to tempt one another to go anywhere.
b) Record implies responding (re) to a rope, string, twist (cord) aka to bondage by free will of choice, which is why any recording made by an instrument ignores sound moving.
A jew suggests information to tempt gentiles to "record" it by consent within mind/memory, which distracts gentiles from perceivable inspiration moving through each ones mind, hence animating each being of sound mind.
c) Microphone implies a distortion (micro vs marco) of sound (phone)
d) Picture implies a captured moment aka the inversion of momentum (inception towards death) which matter (life) cannot capture, since it moves.
Recording; distorting and capturing represent tools for mind-control, and each requires ones consent to record,distort and capture what another suggests.
sine wave that form
Sine/sinus - "curve"....form (life) within flow (inception towards death) implies a sine wave aka a temporary growth during ongoing loss aka sound curving instruments from one another within a spectrum.
Consenting to me showing you a curve on a screen inverts SINUS into US SIN(ing) aka a sin/synchronization of instruments.
If you want
Reason (want vs not want) contradicts implication (if/then), which is needed for one to think straight.
tell us the physics
a) The EL in tell implies "all", which one ignores when telling tales to one another.
b) Physic/bheue - "to be, exist, grow"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/physic
Us (plural synthesis) prevents ones (singular analysis) growth, while suggested THE-ism tempts ones consent (ones choice) under the authority of another (chosen one).
Word analyzing is NOT the way to do that.
Only within a way (natural sound) can a word (articulation of sound) be shaped...the separation of natural into artificial implies an analytical process. Holding onto the shape, while ignoring the process, implies synthetic possession within the analytical process of a potential being.
Analyzing "not" implies a separation of everything into nothing...are you able to further analyze that?
what benefit do you believe
a) To believe implies holding onto, which detriments a being (life) during a process (inception towards death).
b) Bene (in the right way) + fit (be the right shape) implies nature fitting being within (life) right way (inception towards death)...not any benefits a being extracts (consent) by coercion (suggestion) from one another.
this activity will do
a) Nature implies the action that does, each being within implies ones will to react.
b) Analyzing the synthesis of words within sound implies a reaction aka a regeneration of instrument (mind structured within) sound.
It clears ones mind to analyze what others synthesize aka cleaning up the artificial possession during the natural process within self...NOT for others.
One cannot let go of what another willingly chooses to hold onto aka the words others don't see any value in analyzing, while synthesizing with them within a fallen world of lies and deception.
From the christian perspective...God (perceivable sound) or Satan (suggested word) based on each ones free will of choice.
Logos (suggested word) > logic (circular thinking) > reason (turning against one another) represents a synthesis...not Gods (all sound) analysis (each instrument) aka self discernment.
Is that one direction finite or infinite?
a) It was before anyone within can suggest to one another what it is.
b) Finite implies those directed; in-finite implies within those directed. The one directing implies all...not finite or infinite.
c) Finite or infinite implies a measurement taken...direction implies given to those directed. Those who take ignore given.
Maybe...
...implies may/magh (to be able, have power) of a being, not whats directing the state of being. Only within energy can there be power, as in...energy enables power.
for one...for all
Forward implies from all through each one within. Reasoning aka for one vs for another or for all vs not for all tempts one to ignore that.
Reason implies a circle shaped within linear "forward" direction.
Sound moves in one direction...rearranging words within doesn't change that.
the kingdom of God
Aka being king (matter) within dominance (momentum) of God (motion)...
sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers...
Choosing any of these prevents one from being king within the dominance of God, because each of those lowers ones position from heaven (to heave) into hell (to cover).
hates faggots
Faggot/fasces - "burden"...both loving or hating another burdens oneself within the resulting conflict of reason (love vs hate).
shall surely be put to death
Nature assures death to each living being. Inception puts life towards death.
to build consensus about where we're going (namely just "a fairer and more transparent world")
Consensus binds free thinking, hence making transparency (perception) opaque (suggestion). Also...what's fairer than being given free will of choice?
what constitutes "excessive, unnecessary"
Is arguing necessary? If not...is it excessive to argue against one another? If it is, then what for?
If one argues to prove or refute a proposition to another, then doesn't one ignore that nature proposes being, which neither requires proof, nor refutation?
Everything in the cosmos is mathematically determined
a) Cosmo-gony (cosmetics upon generation) + math-e-matic (mowing in magic) + deter-mined (fear mining)
b) Only within everything can each thing come into being...cosmogony; mathematics and determination are applied to an artificial sum of things.
c) If uni (one) verse (to turn); then what could one turn to? What could God turn to? What could energy turn to? What could cause turn to? What could whole turn to? What could all turn to?
What if there's only one line (inception towards death) for each one (life) within? What does turning imply in that situation? Where can life turn to while in the process of dying?
seven is the number of perfection
Aka s-even (split even), as in she (split he); female (feminine male) or woman (womb man)...an internal transformation of flow (inception towards death) into form (life) aka even (balance) splitting into each odd (choice).
determinism (that doesn't contradict freewill)
Consenting to a suggested -ism implies ones free will of choice binding self to another...being bound contradicts being free.
AI is an attempt
Tempting who to do what? Free will of choice to bind self by consenting to a suggestion?
when unexplained, it is effectively magic
If effect implies cause, then ex-plain implies expressed effect within plain cause.
UN- implies the suggested negation aka reversal (turning) of cause towards effect into "affecting effect to ignore cause" while turning on itself (logic) and onto each other (reason).
Affecting (suggestion) effect (perception) to ignore cause (perceivable)...how isn't that self explanatory?
manifesting kosmoi
If kosmos aka uni-verse implies singular, then how could one be manifolded into a plural kosmoi?
Edit: a sleight of hand for turning... https://genius.com/The-beach-boys-i-get-around-lyrics
- I'm (life) getting bugged driving up and down this same old strip (inception towards death)
- I gotta find a new place (consent) where the kids are hip (suggested information)
- My buddies and me are getting real (perception) well-known (perceivable)
- Yeah, the bad guys know us (gentiles), and they leave us alone (jew)
https://img.gvid.tv/i/3CdYYHde.png (notice he tips his head)
Linking it to “digital life”?
Digit (numeral below 10) + al (all)...all implies one for each one within; zero implies ones ignorance of all for one another, which establishes the link aka the digital "log-in" of ana (throughout) logos (logic/reason) life.
interpretation of
Interpret/interpretari aka inter (within) + pre/per (forward; through) implies all perceivable forwarding, while moving through each ones perception within.
Getting ones interpretation from any suggestion by another tempts one to ignore that.
the obsession with numbers, gematria, geometry
a) Obsession aka ob (against) sed (to sit)...a jew suggests numbers to shape a sed-i-ment (settled within mind) aka a consensus within the mind of gentiles, who by consenting are choosing a side against one another.
Upvote vs downvote implies "to sit against" aka obsession aka 1 vs 1 conflict about numbers.
b) Gematria aka natural generation (ge) + artificial metric (matria)...any measurement taken ignores generation given.
Being implies unit (life) of length (inception towards death)...measuring the length (dying) corrupts the unit (living). Life cannot perceive ones inception or death...others suggest it in historical or futuristic terms of fiction for ones consent to measure.
c) Geometric aka geomancy - "art of divination by means of signs derived from the earth"...divination implies nature dividing into being; artifice implies being holding onto signs derived by each other.
Only one aspect of natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) tempts one to hold onto...land aka earth aka matter aka solid; not spirit (air) or liquid (water) which one ignores when holding onto solid.
Perceivable implies liquid; perception implies solid; perceivable moving through perception implies spirit...suggested materialism tempts one to ignore liquid (motion) and spirit (momentum) for solid (matter).
the full episode of tuckers show
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_czibJylWs
actual salvation
a) Actual (all acting) + salvation aka sol (whole) ation (action) implies all action upon each ones reaction within aka whole acting upon each partial reaction within.
b) Actual salvation (perceivable moving through perception) or fictional salvation (suggested held by consent).
c) The trick about salvation...saving suggested within memory, while ignoring perceivable moving through.
kabbalah
Cabbala/qibbel - "to receive" implying ones perception receiving all perceivable, also kabba+alah (cube of allah) aka kaaba/kaʽba al.
Allah implies "law of all" aka natural law; cube implies "cueing being" aka all perceivable giving each ones perception the "cu" to "be".
Furthermore...ones perception within all perceivable implies in-between left/right + up/down + front/back aka from within a cube aka a cubical (all cuing being). A cue implies intimation - "action of making known".
digital becoming AI
Coming into being implies a setting apart of perceivable and perception; coming together implies analog consent to digital suggestion of artificial in-tel-ligo (within tale of bondage).
book of revelation
Aka to bind what's revealed with whatever is written into it. Nature reveals by action; a book binds ones reaction to whatever is written in-between covers.
Words are shaped by LETTERS aka by one LETTING another shape words...words keep letters confined.
“shorts” suck
Suggesting less sucks ones consent into wanting more...
What you have now will be gone.
Will implies ones potential response during an ongoing process...others suggest "having" to invert potential by possession.
As for gone..."loss is nothing else but change, and change is nature's delight." ~Marcus Aurelius
kept information accessible only by...
Inspiration is always accessible, yet cannot be kept.
Socrates died 600 years before Cuckstantinople was formed
Different Socrates... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socrates_of_Constantinople
its never ending cycle
How does one shape a circle? By drawing a line and combining beginning and end together. The never ending implies the line...not the circle shape within. It's ouroboros again aka circular logic preventing one from thinking straight.
giving good
Nature doesn't give good...natures gives all to each one within. A being is tempted to ignore all given for wanting (good) or not wanting (bad) from one another.
wheel of time
Time implies taking a measurement of linear progression, which by setting artificial beginning and end, establishes a wheel (circular logic).
A line (process) cannot be taken (possession) without contradicting the potential of each one within.
you give a lot (of nutrition) to chew on.
Only nature gives and takes, which in terms of nutrition implies "hunger"...not whatever a being chooses to chew on.
These temporary bindings are how we grow!
a) One grew free before choosing to bind self to others (we).
b) Freedom implies temporary during ongoing...any bonds made restrict the temporal from freely responding to ongoing.
The oak grows stronger in the wind
Only during temptation can resistance grow.
All did that to allow choice
Allow aka "all lowering" each one within. Dis-al-low implies the division of each one lowered within all.
Allow and disallow are not in conflict with one another...others suggest allow vs disallow to tempt ones choice into a conflict against one another.
the choice between seeking, or rejecting, re-union
a) Seeking implies suggested outcome...finding/found/foundation implies perceivable origin. "seek an ye shall find" tempts one to ignore that only within foundation can one seek outcomes.
It's also seeking which tempts one to ignore singularity (foundation) for plurality (outcomes aka all the stuff one has and hasn't found yet).
b) Re (to respond) ject (to throw)...being implies thrown (inception towards death) response (life).
c) Reunion implies each ones (uni) response (re) within action (ion)...not the coming together with one another as suggested by others as for example reunion celebrations.
Where's the self reflection in reuniting with others?
Desire implies want; require implies need...Living naturally, these rightly align - would you agree?
These implies plural...ones want within oneness of need implies singularity. It's your plural view, which contradicts alignment aka thinking straight. Instead you think circular (agree vs disagree) aka versus/vers - "to turn".
How could a turn be rightly aligned? Using implication (if/then) instead of reason (vs) realigns oneself to all, because it prevents one from turning against one another.
millennia removed from nature, seems to be this process of analysis
Millennia implies measurement taken aka a synthesis. Nature cannot be taken from...it moves (inception towards death) response (life) apart during an analytical process.
One cannot perceive a millennia...it's a suggested span (distance between two objects).
ultimately a choice
Since when is choice an aim (ultimate)? It's the response to being directed. Others utilize suggestions to tempt ones choice to aim consent at it.
Consent implies shooting blanks...it makes choice infertile by inverting it into chance.
procession of choices
One process (inception towards death) for each ones potential choice (life) within..."choices" implies ones choice consenting to suggested pluralism aka potential taking into possession.
How does one express potential when possession represses?
questions are made painfully
Question (a quest towards outcome) and answers (from others) tempt one to ignore solution (being dissolved within action). The pain represents the ignorance one feels when gaining answers to questions. No pain; no gain.
Suggested answers amount to nothing/nihilo (ones denial of perceivable) and any quest moves life towards death.
them/us/you/me and the like
Aren't them, us, you and me different from one another? If one consent to the suggested labels them, us, you, and me, then does that shape alike consensus?
How many define self as them, us, you or me? How come that only oneself can see through that deception?
How could one (potential) within all (process) be me/mine (possession)?
“hermits” and “retards”
Aka isolating the ones (jew) who don't fit the sum (gentiles)...nature isolates; artifice summates.
that’s the shitty (?) part about using language to communicate, not only is “it” ever-shifting, but everyone has their own personal definitions for words.
a) Definition aka deaf phonetician (deaf to sound) implies each ones choice to hold onto words, while ignoring that sound moves, and cannot be held onto. This ignorance permits others to shapeshift letters into words.
Letter implies one who LETS another shape words...
Shift implies each shifting choice within linear progression of all balance...the issue is shifting to hold onto one side over the other, while ignoring the process of separation.
b) Ones "parts with shit" during a process unless shaping a temporary congestion like as if by holding onto words that continue to lose their definitions.
Analysis sets apart; synthesis holds together...that's why others throw shit if one takes their definitions apart. It's like not wanting to let go, but simultaneously having too much already and so the projection begins.
to communicate
TO implies towards aka to (inception towards death) ward (life)...living implies as warden within process of dying.
COM (together) contradicts UNI (apart from one another)...what could one communicate to another one, that all hasn't already set apart from one another?
Notice together (intercourse) apart (off-spring) implying a choice of needing let go during the temptation of wanting to hold onto. That's implies analysis of natural comm-unic-ation...it doesn't require me to communicate it to you as a synthesis, yet only oneself can discern the distinction between analysis (perception within perceivable) and synthesis (consenting to suggested).
We choose to struggle to communicate, because, I believe
Ones choice to posses self (I); hold onto (believe) and join others (we) increases ones struggle to sustain self apart from one another within all.
Letting go of COM (I; believe; we) allows UNION aka ones discernment about being a unit (uni) within all (ion).
we recognize the alternative
If one joins we, then how could one alternate from one another? Recognize that contradiction....
One can only claim by free will of choice, while being relieved. Others suggest proofs to tempt ones consent to claim self imposed burdens.
Only within everything can nothing be shaped. Nothing/nihilo implies suggested nihil-ism tempting ones de-nial of everything perceivable.
Only within everything (cause) can each thing (effect) be expressed.
To measure implies artificially synthesizing what nature separates for analysis.
One can only measure all, while being in the process of separation from one another. Life cannot measure its inception or death, hence being in-between a process of separation (analysis).
There can be only one cause for each effect within...others suggest pluralism to tempt ONE to ignore singularity.
Cause implies primal (inception) and final (death) for each effect (life) within...others suggest sequence/sequi (to follow) to tempt one into ignoring perceivable primal for suggested final.
a) Being implies the secondary (seco; to divide) inference within first cause.
b) Things cannot be all...only within all can each thing come into being. Others suggest one to measure the sum of all things, which implies a game of puzzle aka mosaic law. No matter what one summons together...nature divides it apart.
a) All was perceivable before ones perception can suggest another what it is...definitions, combinations and callings tempt one to ignore natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion).
b) Entity/einai - "to be" implies towards (inception towards death) being (life)...a process of separation; not something requiring a cosmetic (cosmos) name.
Only after one consents to the suggested label "cosmos", does it become specified information aka meaning. Nature doesn't suggest information...it moves perceivable inspiration through each beings perception.
a) Nature doesn't contain aka con (together) + tenere (to hold)...it sets each one within free (will of choice) from one another.
b) Only within all (motion) can there be soil (momentum) for each seed (matter).