Is truth finally crossing over to the mainstream?
Mainstream (inception toward death) media (life)...a linear passing over of each being through the middle of all nature.
The "mainstream media" suggested by others...a) makes the one suggesting it the mediator for the ones consenting to follow; b) tempts followers to choose a side (truth or false), hence crossing each other within the linear main stream.
Notice the guy wearing the Ghostbusters shirt... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyKQe_i9yyo aka don't cross the one and only perceivable main stream with any suggested "mainstream"...
Autism should not be seen as single condition with one cause
a) There's only one cause for any effect within.
b) Ones consent to suggested aut-ism makes one an aut-ist, which is how others utilize affection to distract effect from cause.
Those others were Paul Eugen Bleuler (coined autism) and Sigismund Schlomo Freud (father of psychoanalysis) who conspired with one another to conquer psychiatry... https://img.gvid.tv/i/3gc1x1nk.jpg
social interaction
Interaction implies each ones internal reaction within all action...a separation from one another. Others invert this by suggesting social-ism aka together (soc) within (i) all (al).
A being isn't social with one another, but an integer within all...as in...a jewish integer within all socializing gentiles.
If someone steps on your TOE you go OW, hence t-ow.
they can debate and manipulate God
God implies singularity; "they" implies plurality...that's the manipulation (pulling many together within action), which establishes a debate among those pulled together.
A jew suggests pluralism to tempt each consenting gentile into a plural consensus that ignores singularity. The godless are the gentiles who believe in the "sum of all things" aka to bring together what the one and only god sets apart.
Martin Luther called out the jews
a) To "call out" inverts being one "within all". The issue...a gentile cannot C (see) that. Does one C-ALL (see all) or does one listen to the call of another...it's ones free will of choice to discern this for self.
b) Luther/luth/lute - "flute" + Martin/mars - "war"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fife_(instrument)
That aside...Martin was born LUDER (prostitute; whore), hence blowing the flute.
yom kippur (day of atonement)
a) Atone implies at (towards) one (single unit)...not being in accordance with one another. Atonement implies ones mind resisting the temptation to accord (consent) with another (suggestion), which allows one to be at (perceivable) one (perception).
b) Yom aka day implies "daze" aka ones bewilderment, when stunning self by consenting to the suggestion of one another.
repent
Aka penitire/poenitire - "to make sorry" aka filling oneself with sorrow, when consenting to the suggestion of one another.
we; our; people...sins
Sin/syn implies a synthesis aka synchronization of singular units together into a plurality.
If one joins a we, our; people, us etc. then one repents a sin, while dazing self in accordance with one another. Only letting go of the joint-venture called "consensus" allows one to atone aka to be at one, instead of being bound with one another.
departed from God
Depart implies the division (inception towards death) of partial (life) within whole.
Offspring implies child departing from mother...
feeling sorry
Aka filling oneself with sorrow...another sin.
how is it my choice?
MY implies ones free will of choice taking self into possession, which requires IDENTIFICATION from one another. It also establishes the conflict between mine vs yours aka I (i am; je suis; jesus) vs YOU (jew).
The government already has records
For others to govern ones ment/mind...one has to record mentally the rules others suggest one to follow.
Doing that tempts one to ignore the implication of AL-RE-ADY aka "all adding ones response".
What could I do to stop them
Choosing to let go of possession (I); ignorance of motion (stop) and suggested pluralism (them).
Without possession...one can express potential; without ignorance of motion...one can adapt to being (life) moved (inception towards death), and without plurality one can discern oneself within singularity.
a system that consolidates all your life data on one...
Being implies one within all...ones consent to suggested data, consolidates consensus, into a system controlled by others.
ID (identification)
- IDENTI implies "being the same"...a fictitious inversion of being different from one another.
- FICA implies fiction...the inversion of reality.
- TION implies action...the cause (al) of reaction (re).
It is time to dump the whole system and run this Country as Civilians under Common Law which we enforce.
a) Only within whole can partials be shaped into a system. A system can never be whole, but it can distract partials from discerning self within whole.
b) Time; country; civilian; common; we...those represent artificial systems; shaped within whole of nature, to synchronize many under few.
later
Ignoring perceivable (now) for suggested (later) tempts one to ignore later/lata/le - "to let go"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/late
Contemplating what's gonna happen "later" implies holding onto an artifice, while ignoring what one perceives "now"...which moves and therefore cannot be held onto.
Fasting implies resisting the temptation to take...Ozempic tempts one to take something different than what one took before.
Medication is utilized to distract one from remaining "on the take". It doesn't matter what one takes; only that one takes, because that ignores all given.
learn to fish
Aka work will set you free (Arbeit macht Frei)...
jews created a powerful cluster of images and ideas
A jew suggested creationism to shape a consensus among gentiles. This consensus represents the powerful cluster of gentiles; filled with images and ideas suggested by a jew.
values came to be defined by
There can be only one value (flow) for each ones evaluation (form) within. A jew suggests the definition of words to for example invert singularity (value) into plurality (values) aka an inversion of reality into fiction.
Same trick with movies (plural), which distract viewers from being (life) within the one and only motion (inception towards death).
Where does the jew get his imagination?
Ation/action was already there before a jew came into being as a reaction within. Gentiles ignore this action for images shaped by a jew. Consenting to suggested images permits a magi to shape ones i-magi-nation.
In short...a jew utilizes what one GOT (perceivable), while tempting gentiles to GET (suggested).
What is his secret?
All (perceivable) is given to each one (perception)...a jew makes a secret out of perceivable by tempting gentiles to hold onto suggested.
Nature doesn't hold secrets...those within holding onto artifice make a secret out of nature.
And what is his intention?
Intent implies "leaning towards"...a jew shapes within origin, while tempting gentiles to lean towards outcome.
Oh, and our resident linguistic deconstructionist.
Well... -ist implies ones consent to a suggested -ism aka a synthetic structure. Analyzing that implies the deconstruction.
expecting a surprising amount of discussion...and it was all just him.
a) Expectancy of amounting ignores nature separating each being from one another. It's each jew who amounts gentiles, and who suggests AI to tempt expectancy.
b) Finding oneself on a conspiracy forum implies setting self apart from others, hence thinking for self.
Instead of reading the AI slop answers; try just reading his questions, and what the line of thinking to shape them implies.
Notice that this thread is about getting offended about a "constructed" wall of text, while you bring up the only one "deconstructing" it. A jew neither chooses either side, nor participates in the conflict in-between them...a jew doesn't take an offer by gentiles.
untie hands
Wears tie around his neck...
rules of engagement
An engaging mind stands in conflict with another (correct vs incorrect), a disengaged mind resists the temptation to engage in conflict with another, thereby remaining free.
As for rule/reg - "to move in a straight line"...that implies nature disengaging each mind within from one another, hence allowing each to think "straight".
mystery of lawlessness
Ignoring natural law casts a myst/mist within ones mind.
the 3 abrahamic religions
Abh (father) raham (multitude), hence one father for any multitude of religions.
the sum of infinite possibilities.
Summation represses possibility. Possible aka posse (being able) implies each enabled being, separated from one another, during a whole process.
Procession (inception towards death) separates potential (life).
It's a jew who suggests the sum of all things aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka mosaic law (puzzling parts together into a whole) aka united states; united nations; united kingdom; european union; soviet union aka uniformity; university; unicode; unicef; universal pictures; universal basic income aka "There comes a time when we heed a certain call; when the world must come together as one"... https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/michaeljackson/weretheworldusaforafrica.html
Einstein became the benchmark
For relativity aka for conditioning and brainwashing those who nature set apart from one another, into artificially relating to one another within a scientific consensus.
Meanwhile...Einstein aka EIN (one) ST (saint/sancire/to separate) EIN (one) aka the separation of oneness (whole) into each one (partial) within.
Ayh have spent 15 years advocating for review of particle theory...
It's as cheap as using free will of choice to discern oneself as particle within all of nature. No theory; just praxis aka practicing free will of choice by resisting the temptation to bind self to another.
Ayh agree
If a particle agrees, then it relates to other particles, which inverts the particular nature into artificial commonality.
A jew utilizes suggestion to tempt gentiles to agree or disagree, thereby establishing a relation among both sides within a conflict called reason (agree vs disagree).
As in..."The theory of relativity, developed by Albert Einstein, includes two main parts"...suggestion and consent aka special relativity (ones consent to the suggested) and general relativity (consensus formed by each ones consent).
you won't get funding
Foundation implies that which separates one from one another...ones consent to suggested funding from one another tempts one to ignore that.
Funding from another distracts from being within foundation.
narrative line
There's only one line (inception towards death) for each one (life) within...it isn't narrating; but moving sound through those who choose to shape noisy narratives to distract each other from the sound of silence.
peer review
Review aka re (to respond) view/weid (to see) implies each ones different perspective (perception) within all (perceivable)...ones consent to any suggestion by another establishes a consensus aka an artificial equal (peer) among natural differences (review).
physics
- Physic/bheue - "to be, exist, grow"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/physic
Suggested physicism by another tempts one to ignore self discernment as being within all of nature. Perception implies natural; suggestion implies artificial...a suggestion by another requires ones consent to ignore all perceivable.
vaxxidents
Ones perception within all perceivable implies DUI (driving under the influence). Ones consent to the suggestion of another implies DWI (driving while intoxicated). Others utilizing suggested to distract one from perceivable implies OUI (operating under the influence).
Vaccines represent the suggested tool to operate on, and intoxicate with, consenting drivers...formed (life) within the fluid (inception towards death) of nature.
- Meta/me - "in the middle"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/meta-
Each ones perception can only come into being in the middle of all perceivable...ones consent to any suggestion of another tempts one off-center, and into circumference.
A jew erects at center while cutting off circumference by circumcision. This isn't just about the foreskin of the penis, but also about the "dickheads" among gentiles.
facial recognition
a) Recognition implies ones responding cognizance to action aka ones free will of choice to utilize perception within all perceivable.
A jew tempts gentiles to overlook recognition by consenting to suggested, while ignoring perceivable. To overlook implies the inversion of recognition, and the suggesting jew under-casts towards the over-looking gentiles, who seek to under-stand what the suggested means.
b) Facial implies face/facies (appearance; form; figure) within all (departure; flow; anima)...hence each one being as animated (inception towards death) figure (life) within all.
c) Only if all separates into each one, can each one recognize one another within all...that's how "facial recognition" operates within nature.
ban aipac
- Ban/bha - "to speak"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/ban
- Pact/pag - "to fasten"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/pact
Speech implies the loosening of sound, which only then allows letters to be put together into words. Sound cannot be fastened by the use of loose speech.
A jew tricks gentiles to consent to suggested speech (ban), which thereby establishes an agreement (pact).
contro il genocido
Geno implies nature generating each being within, hence giving life. Cido implies each beings free will of choice to take life from one another, while ignoring all naturally given.
Control (rolled together) implies the choices of beings rolled together into a "consensus" by a chosen one, who isn't part of the consensus, hence shaping it from outside.
A jew rolls together (contro il) gentiles into a consensus called "reason", within which gentiles mutually kill (cido) each other over artifice, while ignoring nature (geno).
If you think about if this is true or false, then you're stuck within circular logic, which turns into a conflict of reason (true vs false) aka you're controlled by suicidal thoughts (logic) turning into genocidal conflict (reason).
secret covenant
SEC (apart) COV (together)...a contradiction in terms. Suggesting a "secret covenant" tempts those who consent into a contradiction aka into a contradictory stance against one another, which is how any jew can effortlessly instigate conflict among all gentiles.
protocol
Aka protos (first) + kolla (to glue)...first implies a separation into second aka an analytical process. Glue contradicts that into a synthesis of gluing (kolla) together what first (protos) set apart.
learned
To become learned one has to teach self...self discernment...by analyzing self, while resisting the synthesis with others.
you were not FORCED
Choice can only be wielded within balance...motion implies the force generating balance (inception towards death) for choice (life).
Coercion aims temptation at ones free will of choice, and temptation aka temporary within action implies the force of nature moving through each being.
You could take the poison shot for a donut
The donut represents a distraction; the poison shot represents the temptation to justify ones ignorance, and the fear of covid represents ones ignorance of the natural force.
Force moves from origin towards outcome...fear implies towards outcome, while ignoring origin. The "turning point" represents ones free will of choice. Notice also that fear can be held onto; while force can't. Even worse...one forces self to hold onto fear.
Btw a donut implies a circle around nothingness aka circular logic around suggested information. No matter with what logic is filled; one remains hungry for more suggested information aka "homer simpson in hell/heaven"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAvYNmvodGk
It was indeed a weaponization of temptation
But the weapon of choice each one wields freely...
I do consider it to be murder because murder was the intent all along.
Consider aka "siding together" is why one applies justice for crime upon another, while ignoring that each being within nature represents crime within justice.
As for intent aka purpose aka forwarded (inception towards death) position (life)...
Does a lion "intending" to eat a gazelle represents murder or is intention a misnomer of ones judgement?
Look at this... https://www.etymonline.com/word/intention (intent = desire, and turning ones attention)
A jew tempts gentiles with intention and consideration against one another.
What if I bait a trap to catch a rat?
Then you tempt the rat to go for the wanted, yet not needed, bait aka cheese.
The rat must consent that by taking the cheese
The cheese represents the "want vs not want" bait aka the suggestion tempting one to ignore perceivable "need" aka hunger.
the trap may catch him
Consenting to want or not want the suggested bait increases the odds of what may happen. And if both want and not want represent consent to the bait, then that evens the odds for the trap.
So why does "not want" represent consent to the bait? Because it ignores need for want/not want. If one rat chooses to not want; then other rats are being tempted to want. The trapper will notice rats fighting each other over the bait...not all of those rats are just greedy for the cheese, but aware of the danger as well.
Once again the Simpsons showed this by Lisa testing brother vs hamster with an electrocuted cake.
Is it not my intent to murder the rat all along?
Ones intent has no power over the consent of another. Only the force of nature has dominance over each beings free will of choice, hence free-dom.
Why use traps and bait to catch a rat if you've more power in the first place? This is about avoiding the temptations of one another, while nature separates both from one another.
Does the rat's consent...pardon me
The con (together) puts each one (rat + man) on par (equality in value or circumstances) with one another. That's the trick, that's why a jew utilizes tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) to tempt gentiles into a consensus with one another.
As for natural pardon...inception sentences life towards point of death. No pardons. Pardon aka "to forgive" represents the inversion of being (life) given forwards (inception towards death).
All implies light (singular)...others suggest lights (plural) to rearrange the perspective of each being.
Mole (mass) cule (diminutive)...ones consent to what another rearranges implies aug-MENT-ative aka within ones mind. It's your consent to the suggested word "molecule" which augments whatever you're looking at, hence putting an artificial label on a moving nature.
a) Rearranging implies putting into (life) a line (inception towards death) aka ones response within the range of nature.
b) Ones consent to the suggested word "rearrange" binds one to a range/hring (circle)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/arrange aka circular thinking (logic) turning into a conflict (reason).
What's a beam? A ray of light, which implies the internal separation of all light into each ray. Beam also implies baum (tree) aka the growth of each seeded ray within the soil of all light.
As for blue/bhel - "to shine"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/*bhel- which implies each ray within all light being (life) send forth (inception towards death).
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see... https://genius.com/Pink-floyd-shine-on-you-crazy-diamond-lyrics
a) A ray within light cannot take anything into "my" possession without distorting self.
b) Theory implies ones oration (ory) of theism (the)...a giving away to tempt others to hold onto.
c) Only within praxis (natural) can theory (artifice) be shaped.